煤储层原位含气量测试分析:以淮南潘集深部煤层为例
Analysis of Gas Content Testing in Coal Reservoirs: Taking the Deep Coal Seam of Panji Mining Area in Huainan Coalfield as an Example
DOI: 10.12677/OJNS.2023.113056, PDF,   
作者: 随峰堂:安徽省煤田地质局勘查研究院,安徽 合肥
关键词: 煤储层含气量直接法间接法淮南煤田Coal Reservoirs Gas Content Direct Method Indirect Method Huainan Coalfield
摘要: 为对比不同方法对于煤层含气量测试数值的差异,以淮南潘集深部煤层为研究对象,采用直接法和间接法对含气量进行计算。结果表明:由于损失气量计算方法不同,采用直接法测定的煤储层含气量结果存在差异。而损失气量的误差主要来源于煤样暴露时间。采用间接法对煤样推算出的煤储层含气量更接近实际煤储层含气量。从数值上来看,采用直接法计算的结果相比间接法结果偏小,而间接法可以避免估算煤层气损失量,可为煤储层含气量的计算提供一种新思路。
Abstract: In order to compare the differences in gas content testing values of coal seams by using different methods, the deep coal seams of Panji mining area of Huainan Coalfield were taken as the research objects, the gas content was calculated using direct and indirect methods. The results indicate that due to different calculation methods for the lost gas content, there are differences in the gas content results of coal reservoirs measured using direct methods. The error in lost gas content mainly comes from the exposure time of the coal sample. The indirect method is used to calculate the gas content of coal reservoirs, which is closer to the actual situation. From a numerical perspective, the results obtained by using the direct method are smaller than those obtained by the indirect method. However, the indirect method can avoid estimating the lost gas content, and provide a new approach for calculating the gas content of coal seams.
文章引用:随峰堂. 煤储层原位含气量测试分析:以淮南潘集深部煤层为例[J]. 自然科学, 2023, 11(3): 469-475. https://doi.org/10.12677/OJNS.2023.113056

参考文献

[1] 门鹏, 齐德源, 马林军, 等. 关于煤层气含气量测试结果的讨论[J]. 中国煤层气, 2021, 18(4): 29-31+42.
[2] 夏大平, 王宏亮, 郭红玉. 空气干燥基煤的等温吸附平衡模式分析切[J]. 河南理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 29(5): 587-590.
[3] Wei, Q., Hu, B.L., Fang, H.H., et al. (2022) Effective Approach with Extra Desorption Time to Estimate the Gas Content of Deep-Buried Coalbed Methane Reservoirs: A Case Study from the Panji Deep Area in Huainan Coalfield, China. ACS Omega, 7, 11240-11251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] 魏强. 淮南潘集深部煤储层吸附解吸特征分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 淮南: 安徽理工大学, 2016.
[5] 崔福田, 魏强, 冯文青, 等. 煤层瓦斯损失量计算方法探讨及其实践[J]. 科技创新与应用, 2021, 11(36): 39-41+45.
[6] 李迎春, 杨胜强. 瓦斯损失量计算方法的比较分析[J]. 煤矿安全, 2012, 43(9): 166-168.
[7] 雷咸锐, 李恒乐, 侯海海. 关于解吸法测定煤层瓦斯含量中损失量计算的讨论[J]. 煤矿现代化, 2012(1): 57-59.
[8] 郑凯歌, 陈赓, 胡宝林. 基于平衡水吸附实验的深部煤层瓦斯含量预测研究[J]. 煤炭工程, 2013, 45(12): 75-77.
[9] 高德燚. 淮南地区煤系地层微量元素地球化学特征及地质意义[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 淮南: 安徽理工大学, 2017.
[10] 张庆玲, 曹利戈. 煤的等温吸附测试中数据处理问题研究[J]. 煤炭学报, 2003, 28(2): 131-135.
[11] 桑孝伟, 叶树刚, 芦俊. 几种煤层气含量测量方法的对比[J]. 中国煤层气, 2009, 6(3): 27-31.
[12] 陈建伟, 张瑞林, 柴磊. 井下解吸法实测煤层原始瓦斯含量过程中采样损失量计算方法浅析[J]. 煤矿安全, 2010, 41(1): 84-86.
[13] 丁安徐, 廖顺舟, 叶建国, 等. 测定煤层气含量的四种解吸法对比分析[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2013, 41(S2): 194-196.