珠江流域生态补偿效率测度研究
Study on Measurement of Ecological Compensation Efficiency in the Pearl River Basin
DOI: 10.12677/JLCE.2023.122008, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 陈思年：云南财经大学统计与数学学院，云南 昆明
关键词: 珠江流域；综合评价；TOTSIS法；Pearl River Basin； Comprehensive Evaluation； TOTSIS Method
摘要: 珠江流域作为我国经济最活跃的流域之一，对于其流域地区的生态和经济发展都具有重大意义，为探究其生态补偿效率，本探究通过建立三级指标体系，共包含50个指标变量，分别使用熵权法计算得分和熵权-TPOSIS计算排名，通过结果得出相应结论，一是位于珠江流域上游的云南生态补偿效率综合得分较低，而广西的补偿效率得分较高。二是经济效率的权重较大，但不是唯一的主要影响因素，并基于此提出可行性建议。
Abstract: Pearl river basin as one of the most active economic basin in China, for its ecological and economic development is of great significance, to explore the ecological compensation efficiency, this explore through the establishment of threelevel index system, contains 50 index variables, using the entropy weight method to calculate score and entropy Right-TPOSIS ranking, through the corresponding conclusion, one is located in the pearl river basin upstream Yunnan ecological compensation efficiency comprehensive score is low, and the Guangxi compensation efficiency score is higher. Second, the weight of economic efficiency is large, but it is not the only main influencing factor, and feasibility suggestions are put forward based on this.
文章引用：陈思年. 珠江流域生态补偿效率测度研究[J]. 低碳经济, 2023, 12(2): 58-65. https://doi.org/10.12677/JLCE.2023.122008

参考文献

[1] Hoekstra, A.Y. (2003) Virtual Water Trade. Proceedings of the International Expert Meeting on Virtual Water Trade (No. 12), UNESCO-IHF, ELFT, 12-23.
[2] Pagiola, S., Arcenas, A. and Platais, G. (2005) Can Payments for Environmen-tal Services Help Reduce Poverty: An Exploration of the Issues and the Evidence to Date from Latin America. World Development, 33, 237-253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[3] Jørgensen, S. and Zaccour, G. (2001) Time Consistent Side Payments in a Dynamic Game of Downstream Pollution. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 25, 1973-1987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[4] Sarker, A., Ross, H. and Shrestha, K.K. (2008) A Com-mon-Pool Resource Approach for Water Quality Management: An Australian Case Study. Ecological Economics, 68, 461-471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[5] Hecken, G.V., Bastiaensen, J. and Vásquez, W.F. (2012) The Viability of Local Payments for Watershed Services: Empirical Evidence from Matiguás, Nicaragua. Ecolog-ical Economics, 74, 169-176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[6] Sheng, J. and Webber, M. (2017) Incentive-Compatible Pay-ments for Watershed Services Along the Eastern Route of China’s South-North Water Transfer Project. Ecosystem Ser-vices, 25, 213-226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[7] George, M. (2019) Eco-Compensation Policies for Mi-cro-Subjects of Water Resources Development. Journal of Water Resources, 3.
[8] 时润哲, 李长健. 长江经济带水资源生态补偿效率测度及其影响因素研究[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2021, 42(6): 1048-1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[9] 曲超, 刘桂环, 吴文俊, 王金南. 长江经济带国家重点生态功能区生态补偿环境效率评价[J]. 环境科学研究, 2020, 33(2): 471-477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[10] 李谷成. 技术效率、技术进步与中国农业生产率增长[J]. 经济评论, 2009(1): 60-68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[11] 和莹, 常云昆. 流域初始水权的分配[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2006(3): 112-117.
[12] 何筠, 罗红燕. 基于水足迹理论的赣江上下游城市生态补偿研究[J]. 华东经济管理, 2016, 30(12): 9-13.

为你推荐