债务加入参照适用保证合同规范研究
Research on the Application of Guarantee Contract Norms for Debt Addition Reference
摘要: 《民法典》第552条首次明文规定了债务加入制度，然仅规定了成立方式及法律后果，未明确如债务加入人的主体资格是否有限制等诸多问题。立法的模糊必然需要明晰的解释，债务加入之目的与保证之功能类似，皆是为保证债务的履行，同时《民法典》第467条明确授权了法律无明文规定时可参照适用类似的规范，故债务加入可参照适用保证合同的某些实证法规范，以提高债务加入制度适用中的确定性。
Abstract:
Article 552 of the Civil Code explicitly stipulates the system of debt accession for the first time, but only specifies the method of establishment and legal consequences, without clarifying many issues such as whether the subject qualification of the debtor is limited. The ambiguity of legislation inevitably requires clear explanations. The purpose of debt accession is similar to the function of guarantee, both of which are to ensure the performance of debt. At the same time, Article 467 of the Civil Code clearly authorizes the application of similar norms when there are no explicit provisions in the law. Therefore, debt addition can refer to certain empirical legal norms applicable to guarantee contracts to improve the certainty of the application of the debt addition system.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
夏昊晗. 债务加入法律适用的体系化思考[J]. 法律科学(西北政法大学学报), 2021, 39(3): 165-179.
|
|
[2]
|
刘保玉, 梁远高. 民法典中债务加入与保证的区分及其规则适用[J]. 山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2021(4): 121-131.
|
|
[3]
|
刘保玉, 梁远高. “增信措施”的担保定性及公司对外担保规则的适用[J]. 法学论坛, 2021, 36(2): 99-110.
|
|
[4]
|
程啸. 保证合同研究[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2006: 212-223.
|
|
[5]
|
史尚宽. 债法总论[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2000: 752-753.
|
|
[6]
|
刘刚, 季二超. 债务加入类推适用的对象、范围和限度[J]. 人民司法, 2020(13): 89-95.
|
|
[7]
|
崔建远. “担保”辨——基于担保泛化弊端严重的思考[J]. 政治与法律, 2015(12): 109-123.
|
|
[8]
|
江苏省无锡市梁溪区人民法院(2017)苏0213民初944号民事判决书[Z].
|
|
[9]
|
最高人民法院(2016)民322号民事判决书[Z].
|
|
[10]
|
张弓长. 《民法典》中的“参照适用”[J]. 清华法学, 2020, 14(4): 107-124.
|
|
[11]
|
王利明. 民法典中参照适用条款的适用[J]. 政法论坛, 2022, 40(1): 44-55.
|
|
[12]
|
向玗. 债务加入法律实务问题研究——最高人民法院裁判规则总结[J]. 人民司法, 2015(18): 44-48.
|