变化抵抗量表的中文版修订及信效度检验
The Revision of the Chinese Version of the Resistance to Change Scale and Its Testing of Reliability and Validity
DOI: 10.12677/ASS.2023.125364, PDF,   
作者: 王晓霞:内蒙古师范大学心理学院,内蒙古 呼和浩特
关键词: 变化抵抗信度效度Resistance to Change Reliability Validity
摘要: 以510名成年人为被试对变化抵抗量表(The Resistance to Change Scale)进行中文版修订及信效度检验。探索性因素分析发现,中文版变化抵抗量表包含了常规反应、情绪反应、短期聚焦和认知刚性4个维度,共14个条目,累计方差解释率为67.10%;验证性因素分析发现,中文版变化抵抗量表的四因素模型拟合良好(c2/df = 2.27, GFI = 0.90, CFI = 0.93, TLI = 0.91, IFI = 0.93, RMSEA = 0.08);信度检验发现,中文版变化抵抗量表的Cronbach’s α系数在0.75~0.89之间,分半信度在0.73~0.85之间。这表明中文版变化抵抗量表在中国成人群体中具有良好的信效度,可以作为测量变化抵抗的工具使用。
Abstract: This study aimed to revise the Resistance to Change Scale with 510 Chinese adults. The explorative factor analysis showed that the Chinese version of the Resistance to Change Scale included four dimensions: routine seeking, emotional reaction, short-term focus and cognitive rigidity. Fourteen items were contained in the scale and the cumulative variance explanation rate was 67.10%. The confirmatory factor analysis showed that the four-factor model of the Chinese version of the Resistance to Change Scale fitted well (c2/df = 2.27, GFI = 0.90, CFI = 0.93, TLI = 0.91, IFI = 0.93, RMSEA = 0.08). Reliability tests showed that the Cronbach’s α of this scale ranged from 0.75 to 0.89. The split-half reliability is between 0.73 to 0.85. This indicates that the Chinese version of the Resistance to Change Scale has good reliability and validity in Chinese adults, and can be used as a good instrument to measure the resistance to change.
文章引用:王晓霞. 变化抵抗量表的中文版修订及信效度检验[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2023, 12(5): 2678-2685. https://doi.org/10.12677/ASS.2023.125364

参考文献

[1] 吴云, 李春台. 贾谊集校注[M]. 天津: 天津古籍出版社, 2010.
[2] Coch, L. and French, J.R.P. (1948) Overcoming Resistance to Change. Human Relations, 1, 512-532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Piderit, S.K. (2000) Rethinking Resistance and Recognizing Ambivalence: A Multidimensional View of Attitudes toward an Organizational Change. Academy of Management Review, 25, 783-794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Ford, J.D., Ford, L.W. and Amelio, A.D. (2008) Resistance to Change: The Rest of the Story. Academy of Management Review, 33, 362-377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 朱其权, 龙立荣. 国外员工变革反应研究综述[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2011, 33(8): 41-49.
[6] Oreg, S. (2003) Resistance to Change: Developing an Individual Differences Measure. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 680-693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Oreg, S., Mahmut, B., Maria, V., et al. (2008) Dispositional Resistance to Change: Measurement Equivalence and the Link to Personal Values across 17 Nations. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 935-944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Wayne, H., Stewart, et al. (2009) A Test of the Measurement Validity of the Resistance to Change Scale in Russia and Ukraine. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 45, 468-489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] 盛琼芳, 倪婧. 组织变革与员工抵制变革关系的实证研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2010, 27(24): 4.
[10] 刘冰, 李钰菡, 齐蕾. 员工变革态度的研究述评与展望[J]. 中国人力资源开发, 2020, 37(8): 66-83.
[11] 刘璇. 网络负面口碑内容属性与消费者创新抗拒行为的关系研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 武汉: 武汉科技大学, 2012.
[12] 中华人民共和国国民经济和社会发展第十四个五年规划和2035年远景目标纲要[N]. 人民日报, 2021-03-13(001).
[13] 高志华, 杨绍清, Juergen Margraf, Xiaochi Zhang. 心理一致感利兹堡简短版(SOC-L9)中文版的信效度检验[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2013, 21(9): 1327-1329.