日本规制跨境网络赌博犯罪的程序适用经验引介
Introduction to Japan’s Experience in Regulating the Application of Procedures for Cross-Border Internet Gambling Crimes
DOI: 10.12677/ASS.2023.125371, PDF,   
作者: 孙鹏庆:北京师范大学刑事法律科学研究院,北京;冯诗尧:北京师范大学法学院,北京
关键词: 跨境网络赌博犯罪程序适用犯罪治理比较法研究Cross-Border Online Gambling Crime Procedural Application Crime Governance Comparative Law Studies
摘要: 随着网络信息时代的来临,跨境网络赌博犯罪的追诉问题也日益凸显。通过引入比较法研究的视角,日本规制跨境网络赌博犯罪的程序适用为我国提供了有益经验。具体而言,日本跨境网络赌博犯罪面临着司法证明困境、证据收集与审查判断困境、国际司法协助困境。日本通过与域外机关的紧密协助、引入社会主体的参与回应司法证明困境,采取网络卧底侦查、专门的数据法庭科学技术、群组共用服务器的特殊搜查方法解决证据收集与审查判断困境,认可代为取证的方式,并在个案中创制外国制度的追认有效制度以及与欧盟建立司法互助路径从而纾解了国际和区际司法协助困境。
Abstract: With the advent of the Internet information era, the problem of recourse for cross-border online gambling crimes has become increasingly prominent. By introducing the perspective of comparative law research, the application of procedures for regulating cross-border online gambling crimes in Japan provides useful experience for China. Specifically, Japanese cross-border online gambling crimes are faced with judicial proof dilemma, evidence collection and review judgment dilemma, and international judicial assistance dilemma. Japan has responded to the judicial proof dilemma by closely assisting with extra-territorial authorities, introducing the participation of social subjects, adopting undercover network investigation, special data court science and technology, special search methods of group shared servers to solve the dilemma of evidence collection and examination and judgment, recognizing the way of taking evidence on behalf of the court, and creating the effective system of retroactive recognition of foreign systems in individual cases as well as establishing the path of mutual legal assistance with the EU so as to alleviate the international and inter-regional judicial assistance dilemma.
文章引用:孙鹏庆, 冯诗尧. 日本规制跨境网络赌博犯罪的程序适用经验引介[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2023, 12(5): 2725-2732. https://doi.org/10.12677/ASS.2023.125371

参考文献

[1] 岡部正勝. サイバー空間の脅威にどう立ち向かうか法執行機関の闘い[J]. 情報管理, 2017(10): 685.
[2] 上原哲太郎, 奥村晴彦, 森本栄一. サイバー犯罪における追跡可能性と「不可能性」[J]. 日本行動計量学会大会抄録集, 2014(42): 106-107.
[3] 杉山治樹. 「国外における捜査活動の限界」平野龍一ら編『新実例刑事訴訟法』[M]. 東京: 青林書院, 1998: 50-60.
[4] 三明翔. 国際捜査・司法共助により獲得された証拠の証拠能力とロッキード事件最高裁判決の証拠排除の論理[J]. 法学新報, 2014(5/6): 159-175.
[5] 石井徹哉, 渡辺友美. ネットワーク犯罪[J]. 刑法雑誌, 2014(53): 451.
[6] 王志安. 越境コンピューター捜索の法的地位-サイバー犯罪条約が残した課題[J]. 駒澤法学, 2004(3): 117-129.
[7] Goldsmith, J.L. (2001) The Internet and the Legitimacy of Remote Cross-Border Searches. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 2001, 103-118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Bellia, P.L. (2001) Chasing Bits across Borders. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 2001, 35-102.
[9] 指宿信. サイバー犯罪をめぐる手続法的諸問題[J]. 刑法雑誌, 2007(46): 292-293.
[10] 柳川重規. 毒樹果実法理の適用と裁判所の証拠排除権限[J]. 法学新報, 1995(3/4): 32.
[11] 井上正仁. 刑事免責と嘱託証人尋問調書の証拠能力(二) [J]. ジュリスト, 1995(172): 142.
[12] 小川佳樹. 刑事免責による供述強制, 田口守一ら編. 判例演習刑事訴訟法[M]. 東京: 成文堂, 2004: 234-244.