食管癌Ivor-Lewis手术下胃食管吻合方式的最新进展
Recent Progress of Gastroesophageal Anastomosis under Ivor-Lewis Surgery for Esophageal Cancer
摘要: 目前,Ivor-Lewis手术仍然是治疗食管癌的最佳选择,其中最关键的部分在于胃食管吻合技术的发展。为了更好地实现这一目标,我们需要不断改进吻合方法,并对其进行归纳总结。无论是传统的手工吻合技术,还是先进的机械吻合技术,无论是线性吻合还是圆形吻合,其优劣都在影响术后吻合口并发症的发生。因此,有效的吻合技术不仅需要操作简便,更重要的是能够有效减少吻合口并发症的发生,而新型吻合技术也正在不断探索中。食管癌Ivor-Lewis手术之所以未完全使用,是因为目前缺乏较好的吻合方式,所以想要进行推广使用Ivor-Lewis手术,胃食管吻合方式则是以后的研究重点。肿瘤外科医生应在创新性吻合方式上进行更多的研究,在为患者构建更好的预后上不懈努力。
Abstract: At present, Ivor-Lewis surgery is still the best choice for the treatment of esophageal cancer, the most critical part of which is the development of gastroesophageal anastomosis technology. In order to achieve this goal better, we need to improve the anastomosis method and summarize it. Whether it is traditional manual anastomosis technology, advanced mechanical anastomosis technology, lin-ear anastomosis or circular anastomosis, its advantages and disadvantages affect the occurrence of postoperative anastomosis complications. Therefore, effective anastomosis technology not only needs simple operation, but more importantly, can effectively reduce the occurrence of anastomotic complications, and new anastomosis technology is also being constantly explored. The reason why Ivor-Lewis surgery for esophageal cancer has not been completely used is that there is currently a lack of good anastomosis methods, so we want to promote the use of Ivor-Lewis surgery, and gas-troesophageal anastomosis methods will be the focus of future research. Oncological surgeons should conduct more research on innovative anastomotic approaches to build a better prognosis for patients.
文章引用:付佳伟, 缪巍. 食管癌Ivor-Lewis手术下胃食管吻合方式的最新进展[J]. 临床医学进展, 2023, 13(6): 9177-9181. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2023.1361285

参考文献

[1] Sung, H., Ferlay, J., Siegel, R.L., Laversanne, M., Soerjomataram, I., Jemal, A. and Bray, F. (2021) Global Cancer Sta-tistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 71, 209-249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Obermannová, R., Alsina, M., Cervantes, A., Leong, T., Lordick, F., Nilsson, M., et al. (2022) Oesophageal Cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for Diagnosis, Treatment and Follow-Up. Annals of Oncology, 33, 992-1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] van Workum, F., van der Maas, J., van den Wildenberg, F.J., Polat, F., Kouwenhoven, E.A., van Det, M.J., et al. (2017) Improved Functional Results after Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Intrathoracic versus Cervical Anastomosis. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 103, 267-273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] McKeown, K.C. (1993) Prospective Randomized Study of One- or Two-Layer Anastomosis Following Oesophageal Resection and Cervical Oesophagogastrostomy. British Jour-nal of Surgery, 80, 1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 袁勇, 陈龙奇. 食管癌手术中食管胃吻合技术的选择及疗效评价[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2017, 16(5): 454-458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Cerfolio, R.J., Bryant, A.S. and Hawn, M.T. (2013) Technical Aspects and Early Results of Robotic Esophagectomy with Chest Anastomosis. The Journal of Tho-racic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 145, 90-96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 张晓军. 器械吻合与手工分层吻合在食管癌手术中的应用效果比较[J]. 河南医学研究, 2018, 27(5): 843-844.
[8] Shibao, K., Inoue, Y., Sawatsubashi, Y., et al. (2021) iTriangu-lar Stapling Technique: A Novel Reconstruction Method and Clinical Outcomes of Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomo-sis after Esophagectomy. World Journal of Surgery, 45, 1828-1834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] 姚圣, 李宗杰, 刘灿辉, 等. 胸腹腔镜联合食管癌切除食管胃左颈部吻合术视频要点[J]. 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志, 2020, 27(5): 494-495.
[10] Tan, Y., Li, L., Li, S., et al. (2020) Comparison of Circular Stapling, Triangulating Stapling and T-Shape Stapling for Cervical Nastomosis with Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy. Annals of Translational Medicine, 8, 1679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Wang, Y., Zhang, X., Jiang, Y., Ma, G., Wang, Z., Xue, X., et al. (2019) Comparison of Hand-Sewn versus Mechanical Esophagogastric Anastomosis in Esophageal Cancer: Protocol for a Sys-tematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Medicine (Baltimore), 98, e15676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Nguyen, N.T., Follette, D.M., Lemoine, P.H., et al. (2001) Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 72, 593-596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Misawa, K., Hachisuka, T., Kuno, Y., et al. (2005) New Procedure for Purse-String Suture in Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy with Intrathoracic Anastomosis. Surgical Endosco-py, 19, 40-42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Gao, H.J., Mu, J.W., Pan, W.M., et al. (2019) To-tally Mechanical Linear Stapled Anastomosis for Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy: Operative Technique and Short-Term Cancer: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Medicine (Baltimore), 98, e15676.
[15] 方勇, 郭卫刚, 谭黎杰, 等. 改良自牵引Overlap法在Ivor Lewis手术食管胃胸内吻合中的应用价值[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2019, 18(3): 274-278.
[16] Charalabopoulos, A., Davakis, S., Syllaios, A., et al. (2021) Intrathoracic Hand-Sewn Esophagogastric Anastomosis in Prone Position during Totally Minimally Invasive Two-Stage Esophagec-tomy for Esophageal Cancer. Diseases of the Esophagus, 34, doaa106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Peri, A., Furbetta, N., Viganò, J., et al. (2022) Technical Details for a Robot-Assisted Hand-Sewn Esophago-Gastric Anastomosis during Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Sophagectomy. Sur-gical Endoscopy, 36, 1675-1682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Yanni, F., Singh, P., Tewari, N., et al. (2019) Comparison of Outcomes with Semi-Mechanical and Circular Stapled Intrathoracic Esophagogastric Anastomosis Following Esoph-agectomy. World Journal of Surgery, 43, 2483-2489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Zhang, H., Wang, Z., Zheng, Y., et al. (2019) Robotic Side-to-Side and End-to-Side Stapled Esophagogastric Anastomosis of Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy for Cancer. World Journal of Surgery, 43, 3074-3082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef