不同版本高中数学教材比较分析——以立体几何初步为例
Comparative Analysis of Different Versions of Senior High School Mathematics Textbooks—Taking Solid Geometry as an Example
摘要: 2019年,以《普通高中数学课程标准(2017年版)》为编写依据的高中数学教材陆续出版,新教材延续了“一标多版”的特点。在我国现行的数套高中数学教材中,各版本教材在许多方面都存在较大差异。因此有必要对不同版本的高中数学教材进行比较,一方面为教材的完善提供参考,另一方面为教师教学提供参考。几何是高中数学课程的主线之一,其中的“立体几何初步”内容对学生的数学素养要求很高,而教科书对学生的学习和老师的教学都起着重要作用。因此本文选取人教A版(2019)、北师大版(2019)和苏教版(2019)数学教材中必修部分的“立体几何初步”内容为研究对象,从章节目录、知识呈现方式和习题设置三个方面对三个版本教材关于“立体几何初步”的内容进行比较分析,对教师教学和教材编写提出一些建议。
Abstract:
In 2019, high school mathematics textbooks based on the “2017 edition of the General High School Mathematics Curriculum Standards” were successively published, and the new textbooks continued the characteristic of “multiple editions of one standard”. Among the current sets of high school mathematics textbooks in China, there are significant differences in many aspects between different versions of the textbooks. Therefore, it is necessary to compare different versions of high school mathematics textbooks to provide reference for the improvement of the textbooks. On the other hand, it provides reference for teachers’ teaching. Geometry is one of the main lines of high school mathematics curriculum. The content of “solid geometry preliminary” has high requirements for students’ mathematical literacy, and textbooks play an important role in students’ learning and teachers’ teaching. Therefore, this paper selects the content of “solid geometry preliminary” in the compulsory part of mathematics textbooks of People’s Education A Edition (2019), Beijing Normal University Edition (2019) and Jiangsu Education Edition (2019) as the research object. This paper makes a comparative analysis of the contents of “solid geometry preliminary” in the three versions of textbooks from three aspects: chapter directory, knowledge presentation mode and exercise setup, and puts forward some suggestions for teachers’ teaching and textbook compilation.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
张瑞凤, 刘蕴煜. 高中数学教材“几何”部分的比较研究——以“人教A版”与“苏教版”为例[J]. 教育教学论坛, 2020(2): 307-309.
|
|
[2]
|
冯刚. 三种版本教材中两步混合运算内容的比较[J]. 中小学课堂教学研究, 2021(10): 25-28.
|
|
[3]
|
中华人民共和国教育部. 普通高中数学课程标准[M]. 北京: 人民教育出版社, 2018.
|
|
[4]
|
韩旭. 高中数学教材“立体几何”比较研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南京: 南京师范大学, 2017.
|
|
[5]
|
李梦. 我国现行高中数学教材中概率与统计习题的比较[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆师范大学, 2020.
|
|
[6]
|
鲍建生. 中英两国初中数学期望课程综合难度的比较[J]. 全球教育展望, 2002, 31(9): 48-52.
|
|
[7]
|
刘雪明. 不同版本高中数学教材中空间距离内容的比较研究[J]. 中学数学杂志, 2021(9): 15-18.
|
|
[8]
|
张婧婧. 人教A版与苏教版高中数学教材数列部分的比较研究[J]. 数学教学研究, 2014, 33(10): 24-27.
|