孔子忠恕思想再探
Re-Exploring Confucius’ Thoughts on Loyalty and Forgiveness
DOI: 10.12677/CnC.2023.112022, PDF,   
作者: 田洪磊:山东师范大学齐鲁文化研究院,山东 济南
关键词: 孔子忠恕解释生命的安顿 Confucius Loyalty and Forgiveness Interpretation Settling of Life
摘要: 孔子“忠恕思想”的解析是一个老问题,大多数现代学者都采取“以孔解孔”的方法,将“忠恕”或者拆解,或者合并,进而得出两个德目或者一个德目的解答。宋代朱熹更是将“忠恕”融进“理学”的架构之中,虽从表面上看是两个德目,其实是相即不离,可以化为一个德目。然则,圣言简单而深奥,只做这几种解法,虽说能阐发出一些解释,但是其“奥处”却未得见。因此探究“忠恕”之奥处显得更为紧要,而“忠恕”之奥处只能从“生命本身的安顿之处”来寻,只有如此,才能得见“忠恕”。
Abstract: The interpretation of Confucius’ “loyalty and forgiveness” thought is an old problem. Most modern scholars adopt the method of “interpreting Confucius through Confucius”, either by breaking down or combining “loyalty and forgiveness” to arrive at answers with either two moral standards or one. Zhu Xi of the Song Dynasty integrated “loyalty and forgiveness” into the frame-work of “Neo-Confucianism”. Although it appears to be two moral standards on the surface, it is ac-tually inseparable and can be reduced to one. However, the words of the sages are simple yet pro-found. Although these methods can produce some explanations, the essence of it is still difficult to grasp. Therefore, it is more important to explore the essence of “loyalty and forgiveness”, which can only be found in the “settlement of life itself”. Only then can we truly understand “loyalty and for-giveness”.
文章引用:田洪磊. 孔子忠恕思想再探[J]. 国学, 2023, 11(2): 137-142. https://doi.org/10.12677/CnC.2023.112022

参考文献

[1] 杨伯峻. 论语译注[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 2020.
[2] 冯友兰. 中国哲学简史[M]. 赵复三, 译. 北京: 外语教学与研究出版社, 2020.
[3] (宋)朱熹. 朱子语类(第2册) [M]. (宋)黎靖德, 编. 武汉: 崇文书局, 2018.
[4] (宋)朱熹. 四书章句集注[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 2020: 71.
[5] 董楚平. 论语钩沉[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 2011: 98.
[6] 冯浩菲. 关于孔子忠恕思想的界说问题[J]. 孔子研究, 2003(4): 58-64.
[7] 陈寅恪. 论语疏证序[M]//杨树达. 论语疏证. 北京: 科学出版社, 1955: 1.
[8] 劳思光. 新编中国哲学史(一) [M]. 北京: 生活∙读书∙新知三联书店, 2015: 8.
[9] 张岱年. 中国哲学大纲[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2015: 31.
[10] 徐复观. 象山学述[M]//徐复观. 中国思想史论集. 北京: 九州出版社, 2013: 9.
[11] 张汝伦. 《存在与时间》释义(上) [M]. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2014: 32.