基于深度学习的葵花8卫星资料反演降水
Deep-Learning Based Inversion of Precipitation from Himawari-8 Satellite Data
DOI: 10.12677/ORF.2023.133172, PDF,   
作者: 王 瑞:南京信息工程大学大气物理学院,江苏 南京
关键词: 降水反演U-NetCGAN深度学习IMERGHimawari-8卫星Precipitation Retrieval U-Net CGAN Deep Learning IMERG Himawari-8 Satellite
摘要: 本文构建了2016至2019年Himawari-8静止卫星上9个红外通道亮温数据和GPM IMERG半小时平均降水量的机器学习训练集,然后将其划分为训练集(共5352个样本)、验证集(1784)和测试集(1784)。首先,选用目前深度学习技术中使用最为广泛、稳定可靠的U-Net模型,分析了Himawari-8卫星的不同红外通道对降水估计的贡献,比较了9个单通道和多通道的反演,结果表明采用通道13能获得相对更好的反演效果。随后,本文比较了多个单时刻以及多时刻组合的降水反演精度,发现采用多时刻观测输入,并未能进一步改进反演精度。最后,为进一步提升降水反演效果,本文比较了三个模型的反演精度,包括U-Net、pix2pixGAN和ConvMixer等,进行训练和降水反演试验。结果表明,pix2pixGAN反演的降水分布最优,它比其他模型结果更具有鲜明详实的结构。
Abstract: A machine learning training set of nine infrared (IR) channels of Himawari-8 and GPM-IMERG half-hourly mean precipitation is constructed, and it is divided into a training set (5352 samples in total), a validation set (1784), and a test set (1784). The U-Net model, the most widely used and stable deep learning technique, is chosen to analyze the contribution of different IR channels of the Himawari-8 satellite to the precipitation estimation. The retrieval results of single and multiple channels are compared, and it is found that the Channel 13 yields better results. The accuracy of model outputs with the input of single-moment observation and the input of multiple-moment combinations is compared, and it is found that the latter did not improve the accuracy of the inversions. To further improve the precipitation prediction, the accuracy of three different DL models is compared, including U-Net, pix2pixGAN and ConvMixer. The results show that pix2pixGAN is the best model.
文章引用:王瑞. 基于深度学习的葵花8卫星资料反演降水[J]. 运筹与模糊学, 2023, 13(3): 1710-1719. https://doi.org/10.12677/ORF.2023.133172

参考文献

[1] Cheng, H., Wu, T. and Dong, W. (2008) Thermal Contrast between the Middle-Latitude Asian Continent and Ad-jacent Ocean and Its Connection to the East Asian Summer Precipitation. Journal of Climate, 21, 4992-5007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Yao, C., Yang, S., Qian, W., et al. (2008) Regional Summer Precipitation Events in Asia and Their Changes in the Past Decades. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 113, D17107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] 王祝. 广东省降水的趋势变化和时空分布特性分析[J]. 人民珠江, 2006, 27(2): 37-39+50.
[4] 刘永林, 延军平, 岑敏仪. 广东省降水非均匀性与气候变化的响应关系[J]. 中山大学学报: 自然科学版, 2015, 54(5): 138-146.
[5] 廖一帆, 林炳章, 丁辉. 广东省暴雨高风险区划[J]. 水资源保护, 2022, 38(2): 7-16.
[6] Anagnostou, E.N., Maggioni, V., Nikolopoulos, E.I., et al. (2009) Benchmarking High-Resolution Global Satellite Rainfall Products to Radar and Rain-Gauge Rainfall Estimates. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 48, 1667-1683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Kidd, C. and Levizzani, V. (2011) Status of Satellite Pre-cipitation Retrievals. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 15, 1109-1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Stampoulis, D. and Anagnostou, E.N. (2012) Evaluation of Global Satellite Rainfall Products over Continental Europe. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 13, 588-603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Adler, R.F. and Mack, R.A. (1984) Thunderstorm Cloud Height-Rainfall Rate Relations for Use with Satellite Rainfall Estimation Techniques. Journal of Climate and Applied Meteorology, 23, 280-296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Wardah, T., Bakar, S.H.A., Bardossy, A., et al. (2008) Use of Geostationary Meteorological Satellite Images in Convective Rain Estimation for Flash-Flood Forecasting. Journal of Hydrology, 356, 283-298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] 唐国强, 万玮, 曾子悦, 等. 全球降水测量(GPM)计划及其最新进展综述[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2015, 30(4): 607-615.
[12] Min, M., Bai, C., Guo, J., et al. (2018) Esti-mating Summertime Precipitation from Himawari-8 and Global Forecast System Based on Machine Learning. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 57, 2557-2570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] 薛鹏飞, 余钟波, 谷黄河. 雅鲁藏布江流域GPM和TRMM遥感降水产品精度评估[J]. 水电能源科学, 2020, 38(11): 13-16.
[14] 张天宇, 桂术, 杨若文, 等. TRMM和CMORPH卫星资料对三峡库区降水的评估分析[J]. 气象, 2020, 46(8): 1098-1112.
[15] 杨娜, 卢莹, 杨茜然, 等. PERSIANN-CDR产品对淮河流域干旱特征辨识性能评估[J]. 水电能源科学, 2020, 38(3): 1-4+12.
[16] Skofronick-Jackson, G., Petersen, W.A., Berg, W., et al. (2017) The Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) Mission for Science and Society. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 98, 1679-1695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Wang, Z., Zhong, R., Lai, C., et al. (2017) Evaluation of the GPM IMERG Satellite-Based Precipitation Products and the Hydrological Utility. Atmospheric Research, 196, 151-163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Foelsche, U., Kirchengast, G., Fuchsberger, J., et al. (2017) Evaluation of GPM IMERG Early, Late, and Final Rainfall Estimates Using WegenerNet Gauge Data in Southeastern Austria. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 21, 6559-6572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Wang, G., Wang, K., Han, W., et al. (2020) Typhoon Maria Precipitation Retrieval and Evolution Based on the Infrared Brightness Temperature of the Feng-Yun 4A/Advanced Geosynchronous Radiation Imager. Advances in Meteorology, 2020, Article ID: 4245037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Arkin, P.A. (1979) The Relationship between Fractional Coverage of High Cloud and Rainfall Accumulations during GATE over the B-Scale Array. Monthly Weather Review, 107, 1382-1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef