射频消融术治疗腰椎间盘突出症临床恢复效果研究
The Research of Clinical Recovery Effect of Radiofrequency Ablation Therapy for Lumbar Disc Herniation
摘要: 目的:探究射频消融术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床恢复效果。方法:选取杭州市临安区第一人民医院、宁波市宁海县中医院2021年11月~2022年11月80例腰椎间盘突出症患者作为研究对象,均存在腰痛伴坐骨神经痛,或伴有下肢放射痛。采取随机匹配病例对照研究方法,将80例患者分为对照组和观察组,每组各40人。对照组行冲击波治疗,观察组行射频消融术治疗。于患者治疗7日后评估临床恢复效果,并记录疼痛数字评分(NRS)、直腿抬高试验度数、静脉血栓栓塞症风险评分(VTE)和治疗优良率。结果:观察组的临床疗效明显好于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05);经治疗,观察组的NRS疼痛评分低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05);治疗前后两组的VTE评分均无统计学差异(P > 0.05)。结论:对腰椎间盘突出症患者采用射频消融术治疗,可有效缓解患者疼痛,临床效果显著。
Abstract: Objective: To explore the clinical recovery effect of radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation. Method: A total of 80 patients mainly with lumbar disc protrusion were admitted into the First People’s Hospital of Lin’an District, Hangzhou and Ninghai County Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Ningbo from November 2021 to November 2022, who are suffered from lumbago with sciatica, or radiation pain of lower limbs, the 80 patients were divided into the control group and observation group by the random number table method with 40 cases in each group. The control group was treated with shock wave therapy, and the observation group was treated with radiofrequency ablation. The clinical recovery effect was evaluated at 7 days, and the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), straight leg elevation test degree, Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) and the excellent rate were recorded. Result: The clinical effects were more obviously seen in the observation group than that in the control group, and the difference in result was statistically sig-nificant (P < 0.05). After the keyhole treatment, the NRS pain score of the observation group was lower than that of the control group, and the difference was also significant in statistic (P < 0.05). However, the VTE scores of the two groups before and after treatment were not statistically differ-ent (P > 0.05). Conclusion: The treatment for patients with lumbar disc herniation by radiofre-quency ablation can dramatically relieve their pains, which means that it has remarkable clinical effect.
文章引用:周凯, 贾易澎, 卢怡然, 高嘉佑, 李金典, 杨海军. 射频消融术治疗腰椎间盘突出症临床恢复效果研究[J]. 临床医学进展, 2023, 13(6): 9529-9534. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2023.1361334

参考文献

[1] 吉喆. 低温等离子射频消融术与臭氧注射术治疗在腰椎间盘突出症的研究进展[J]. 罕少疾病杂志, 2023, 30(4): 111-112.
[2] Yeung, A.T. (2000) The Evolution of Percutaneous Spinal Endoscopy and Discectomy: State of the Art. The Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine, 67, 327-332.
[3] 李建垒, 宋永伟. 体外冲击波疗法治疗腰椎间盘突出症概况[J]. 中医临床研究, 2020, 12(1): 142-145.
[4] 冯小军, 周云, 吴建贤, 等. 体外冲击波治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效分析[J]. 颈腰痛杂志, 2018, 39(4): 429-431.
[5] 李锡伟. 体外冲击波疗法治疗腰椎间盘突出疼痛的疗效观察[J]. 中国社区医师, 2017, 33(3): 46-47.
[6] 卢振和, 傅志俭, 陈金生. 射频镇痛治疗学[M]. 郑州: 河南科学技术出版社, 2019: 174.
[7] 严广斌. NRS疼痛数字评价量表[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2014, 8(3): 410.
[8] Caprini, J.A. (2005) Thrombosis Risk Assessment as a Guide to Quality Patient Care. Disease-a-Month, 51, 70-78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Park, H.S., Baek, J.H., Park, A.W., et al. (2017) Thyroid Radiofrequency Ablation: Updates on Innovative Devices and Techniques. Korean Journal of Radiology, 18, 615-623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] 程昌志, 李贵谦, 董兴成, 等. 椎间盘镜联合射频消融术治疗多节段腰椎间盘突出症[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2019, 23(1): 50-53.
[11] 佟恒博, 杨先芬, 李光春. 射频热凝靶点联合臭氧溶盘术治疗腰椎间盘突出症髓核回缩效应疗效分析[J]. 中华实用诊断与治疗杂志, 2019, 33(2): 163-165.
[12] 钱栋, 朱红胜, 胡红心, 等. 靶点射频消融治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床应用研究[J]. 中外医疗, 2017, 36(15): 186-187+190.
[13] 林冠林, 蔡振宇. 臭氧注射联合射频消融术治疗腰椎间盘突出症患者的效果[J]. 中国民康医学, 2021, 33(23): 80-82.