基于多框架模型的不同自然带生态安全评价及动态预警研究
Research on Ecological Security Evaluation and Dynamic Early Warning of Different Natural Zones Based on Multi-Frame Model
DOI: 10.12677/GSER.2023.123033, PDF,    国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 成 钊, 王金亮*:云南师范大学地理学部,云南 昆明;云南师范大学资源与环境遥感实验室,云南 昆明
关键词: 生态安全DPSIR模型EES模型综合权重Ecological Security DPSIR Model EES Model Comprehensive Weight
摘要: 生态安全正逐渐成为国家安全体系的重要组成部分,开展生态安全评价研究,可为国家生态环境保护、生态文明建设以及人与自然永续发展提供科学依据。本文以温度带作为划分依据,选取了云南省内分布于各温度带的7个典型区县作为研究对象,结合DPSIR模型与EES模型,构建了云南省不同温度带典型研究区具有特色的生态安全评价体系,通过对研究区2000~2005年生态安全的动态评价,基于该实验结果,了解了其安全演变过程、安全现状、与自然带之间的联系等,并针对其存在的安全问题进行了对策探讨,主要研究结论如下:1) 2000~2005年,云南省7个温度带的代表区域,其生态安全评价综合值整体上逐年提高,从云南省温度带分布的角度看,呈现出从北亚热带向南亚热带增加的趋势。2) 位于滇中地区的北亚热带和中亚热带代表区域生态安全等级整体上居于良好级以上。
Abstract: Ecological security is gradually becoming an important component of the national security system, and conducting ecological security evaluation research can provide a scientific basis for national ecological environment protection, ecological civilization construction, and sustainable development of humans and nature. Based on the division of temperature zones, this paper selected seven typical districts and counties distributed in each temperature zone in Yunnan Province as the research object, combined with the DPSIR model and the EES model, and constructed a characteristic ecological security evaluation system for typical research areas in different temperature zones in Yunnan Province. Through the dynamic evaluation of ecological security in the research area from 2000 to 2005, based on the experimental results, the safety evolution process, its safety status quo, and the connection between it and the natural zone were understood, and the countermeasures are discussed in view of the existing safety problems. The main research conclusions are as follows: 1) From 2000 to 2005, the comprehensive ecological safety evaluation values of the seven representative temperature zones in Yunnan Province have increased year by year. From the perspective of the distribution of temperature zones in Yunnan Province, there is a trend of increasing from the north subtropical to the south subtropical. 2) The ecological security level of the representative regions of the northern and central subtropics located in the central Yunnan region is generally above the good level.
文章引用:成钊, 王金亮. 基于多框架模型的不同自然带生态安全评价及动态预警研究[J]. 地理科学研究, 2023, 12(3): 351-361. https://doi.org/10.12677/GSER.2023.123033

参考文献

[1] 左伟, 王桥, 王文杰, 刘建军, 杨一鹏. 区域生态安全评价指标与标准研究[J]. 地理学与国土研究, 2002, 18(1): 67-71.
[2] 左伟, 王桥, 王文杰, 吴秀芹, 杨一鹏, 杨丽静, 朱晓华. 区域生态安全综合评价模型分析[J]. 地理科学, 2005, 25(2): 209-214.
[3] 高长波, 陈新庚, 韦朝海, 彭晓春. 熵权模糊综合评价法在城市生态安全评价中的应用[J]. 应用生态学报, 2006, 17(10): 1923-1927.
[4] 解雪峰, 吴涛, 肖翠, 蒋国俊, 边华菁, 马勇, 陈建华. 基于PSR模型的东阳江流域生态安全评价[J]. 资源科学, 2014, 36(8): 1702-1711.
[5] 齐清文, 何大明, 邹秀萍, 姜莉莉, 李晋. 云南沿边境地带生态环境3S监测、评价与调控研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2005, 24(2): 1-12+131.
[6] 张向晖, 高吉喜, 董伟, 宋存义. 云南纵向岭谷区生态安全评价及影响因素分析[J]. 北京科技大学学报, 2008, 30(1): 1-6.
[7] 董云仙, 赵磊, 陈异晖, 余艳红, 赵润, 杨广萍. 云南九大高原湖泊的演变与生态安全调控[J]. 生态经济, 2015, 31(1): 185-191.
[8] 付伟, 王见, 刘畅, 杨芳. 基于PSR模型的昆明市城市饮用水源区生态安全问题研究[J]. 中国人口∙资源与环境, 2017, 27(S1): 83-86.
[9] 苗刚松, 王卫. 环保大数据平台的建设与思考[J]. 科技创新与应用, 2020(20): 56-57.
[10] 麦丽开·艾麦提, 满苏尔·沙比提, 张雪琪. 叶尔羌河平原绿洲耕地生态安全评价及预警分析[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2019, 40(7): 135-144.
[11] Seidel, M., Li, F., Langheinrich, U., Gersberg, R.M. and Lüderitz, V. (2021) Self-Dynamics as a Driver for Restoration Success in a Lowland Stream Reach. Limnologica, 88, Article ID: 125873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] 冯斌, 李迪强, 张于光, 薛亚东, 曾鹏. 基于METT的自然保护区管理有效性分析[J]. 西部林业科学, 2017, 46(6): 15-19+25.
[13] 吕广斌, 廖铁军, 姚秋昇, 邓薇. 基于DPSIR-EES-TOPSIS模型的重庆市土地生态安全评价及其时空分异[J]. 水土保持研究, 2019, 26(6): 249-258+266.
[14] 叶辉, 王金亮, 赵娟娟. 基于DPSIR-EES模型的北回归线(云南段)生态安全评价[J]. 水土保持研究, 2021, 28(3): 291-298.
[15] Tavarov, S.Sh., Sidorov, A.I., Valeev, R.G. and Zykina, E.V. (2021) Estimation Method of the State of 6-10 kV Distribution Network. European Journal of Electrical Engineering, 23, 95-101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef