代际互动对农村老年人的多维贫困影响及机制研究
The Impact and Mechanism of Intergeneration Interaction on Mulitdimensional Poverty among Rural Elderly
摘要: 目的:多维贫困的出现严重影响农村老年人的生活,仅凭农村老年人的经济收入水平作为农村老年人是否贫困的唯一标准是不合理的。农村老年人面临的贫困包括幸福感和生活质量的不富足而造成的贫困,暨目前农村老年人面临的是多维贫困。方法:使用CLHLS (2018)农村老年人样本数据,通过A-F方法构建农村老年多维贫困指标,通过获取子女代际支持数据了解农村老年人多维贫困是否会受到代际支持影响及影响机制。运用PSM方法保证样本的内生性问题进行实证检验,使用逐步中介效应进行机制检验。结果:代际的经济支持对农村老年人多维贫困的回归结果不显著结果与已有文献得出结论相反。代际精神支持对农村老年人多维贫困具有显著的负向影响。存在中介效应,代暨代际互动中的精神支持具有提高代际质量的作用,通过提高代际质量有助于缓解老年贫困并降低老年贫困率的发生。结论:提出了建立老年友好型社区,重构家庭养老基础功能;加快发展本地投入和建设;重点发展本土产业的三点建议。
Abstract: The emergence of multidimensional poverty seriously affects the lives of rural elderly people, and it is unreasonable to rely only on the economic income level of rural elderly people as the only criterion for whether rural elderly people are poor. The poverty faced by the rural elderly includes poverty caused by the lack of happiness and quality of life, and the current multidimensional poverty faced by the rural elderly. Using CLHLS (2018) rural elderly sample data, the A-F method was used to construct a multidimensional poverty index for the rural elderly, and the intergenerational support data of children were obtained to understand whether the multidimensional poverty of the rural elderly would be affected by intergenerational support and its mechanism. The PSM method was used to ensure the endogenous problem of the sample for empirical testing, and the stepwise mediation effect was used for mechanism testing. The return of intergenerational economic support to multidimensional poverty in rural elderly people was not significant, and the results were contrary to the conclusions of the existing literature. Intergenerational spiritual support has a significant negative impact on multidimensional poverty of rural elderly. There is a mediating effect, and the spiritual support in generational and intergenerational interaction has the effect of improving intergenerational quality, which helps alleviate poverty in old age and reduce the incidence of poverty in old age by improving intergenerational quality. It is proposed to establish an age-friendly community and reconstruct the basic functions of family pension. Accelerate the development of local investment and construction; Three suggestions for focusing on the development of local industries.
文章引用:丁语豪. 代际互动对农村老年人的多维贫困影响及机制研究[J]. 运筹与模糊学, 2023, 13(3): 1908-1919. https://doi.org/10.12677/ORF.2023.133190

参考文献

[1] 余志明, 吴海涛. 子代贫困能否打破: “勤能补贫”还是“命中注定”?[J]. 新疆农垦经济, 2021(7): 30-44.
[2] Sen, A. (1999) Development as Freedom. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
[3] 杜鹏, 孙鹃娟, 张文娟, 王雪辉. 中国老年人的养老需求及家庭和社会养老资源现状——基于2014年中国老年社会追踪调查的分析[J]. 人口研究, 2016, 40(6): 49-61.
[4] Knodel, J. and Chayovan, N. (2008) Intergenerational Relationships and Family Care and Support for Thai Elderly. Ageing International, 33, 15-27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Alesina, A. and Giuliano, P. (2013) Culture and Institutions. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 解垩, 宋颜群. 社区邻里效应对个人贫困的影响有多大[J]. 财贸经济, 2020, 41(2): 24-38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 于新亮, 严晓欢, 上官熠文, 于文广. 农村社会养老保险与家庭相对贫困长效治理——基于隔代照顾的视角[J]. 中国农村观察, 2022(1): 146-165.
[8] 马瑜, 吕景春. 中国城乡弱相对贫困测算及时空演变: 2012-2018[J]. 人口与经济, 2022(1): 58-73.
[9] 陈志, 丁士军. 新农保实施前后农民养老期望变化研究——基于2009年和2014年农户调查数据的对比分析[J]. 中国行政管理, 2016(7): 83-89.
[10] 胡安宁. 差序格局, “差”、“序”几何?——针对差序格局经验测量的一项探索性研究[J]. 社会科学, 2018(1): 64-74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] 乐章, 刘二鹏. 家庭禀赋、社会福利与农村老年贫困研究[J]. 农业经济问题, 2016, 37(8): 63-73, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] 何圆, 王伊攀. 隔代抚育与子女养老会提前父母的退休年龄吗?——基于CHARLS数据的实证分析[J]. 人口研究, 2015, 39(2): 78-90.
[13] 李梦竹. 代际经济支持对农村老年人劳动参与的影响——基于CHARLS2013的实证研究[J]. 调研世界, 2018(4): 26-31.
[14] 李肖亚, 孙金明. 老年人精神需求满足与社会支持的关系机制研究——基于中国老年社会追踪调查(CLASS)的数据[J]. 山西大同大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 34(4): 20-24.
[15] 于长永, 董敏琳, 马瑞丽. 代际关系质量对农村老年贫困的影响——基于全国12个省份1395份基层调查数据的实证分析[J]. 农业技术经济, 2019(5): 27-38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] 周律, 陈功, 王振华. 子女性别和孩次对中国农村代际货币转移的影响[J]. 人口学刊, 2012(1): 52-60.
[17] 吴茜, 姚乐野. 子女代际支持对农村老年多维贫困的影响研究[J]. 农村经济, 2020(4): 51-59.
[18] 宋嘉豪, 郑家喜, 吴海涛. “养儿防老”还是“养儿啃老”: 男性子嗣对农村老年贫困的影响[J]. 农业技术经济, 2019(12): 131-142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] 郭熙保, 周强. 长期多维贫困、不平等与致贫因素[J]. 经济研究, 2016, 51(6): 143-156.
[20] 吴海涛, 程威特. 新时代相对贫困的概念内涵解析[J]. 东北农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 19(1): 21-28.
[21] 吴海涛, 侯宇, 曾燕芳. 多维贫困视角下农村家庭性别贫困度量[J]. 统计与决策, 2013(20): 27-29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef