积极建言还是消极离职?员工感知CSR的差异化反应——以组织认同为中介变量的PLS-SEM分析
Positive Voice Advice or Negative Resignation? Differentiating Responses of Employee-Perceived CSR—Based on PLS-SEM Analysis of the Mediation Role of Organizational Identification
摘要: 基于325份问卷数据,通过PLS-SEM模型,考察了员工感知的企业社会责任对员工组织建言和离职意愿的影响机制。结果表明:员工感知的企业社会责任正向显著影响员工组织建言,但是负向显著影响离职意愿;同时,组织认同在员工感知的企业社会责任和组织建言及离职意愿之间起到部分中介的作用。因此,企业实施的社会责任实践一旦被员工感知时,将有助于提升员工的组织认同感,进而激发员工的组织建言和减少员工的离职意愿。建议鼓励企业积极对员工、消费者、政府和社会利益相关者履行相应的责任,以提高员工对组织的认同感、组织建言和工作的稳定性。
Abstract: Based on the questionnaires which were filled by 325 knowledge employees, current study examined the impact of perceived corporate social responsibility (CSR) on employees’ organization voice and turnover intention. Data were examined through a two-stage approach in the PLS-SEM. The empirical test results indicated that perceived CSR positively and significantly influenced employees’ organization voice, but negatively and significantly influenced employees’ turnover intention. Meanwhile, recent study also found that organizational identification partially mediated both the relationship between perceived CSR and organization voice, CSR and turnover intention. Therefore, the perceptions of CSR practices will help employees to enhance their organization identification, and then motive them to express their voice in the organization and reduce their turnover intention. Therefore, it is encouraging when corporates fulfill their social responsibility within employees, consumers, governments and social or non-social stakeholders.
文章引用:付礼菲, 汤美润, 何跃勇. 积极建言还是消极离职?员工感知CSR的差异化反应——以组织认同为中介变量的PLS-SEM分析[J]. 运筹与模糊学, 2023, 13(3): 1920-1931. https://doi.org/10.12677/ORF.2023.133191

参考文献

[1] 权小锋, 吴世农, 尹洪英. 企业社会责任与股东崩盘风险: “价值利器”或“自利工具” ? [J]. 经济研究, 2015, 50(11): 49-64.
[2] Lee, B. and Jeanne, M. (1996) How Corporate Social Responsibility Pays Off. Long Range Planning, 29, 495-502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Homer, H. (2003) Does It Pay to Be Good? Social Re-sponsibility and Financial Performance. Business Horizons, 46, 34-40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Michael, E. and Mark, R. (2002) The Competitive Ad-vantage of Corporate Philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 80, 56-69.
[5] Jamie, S., Ronald, P.H. and Diane, M. (2003) Corporate Social Responsibility in the 21st Century: A View from the World’s Most Successful Firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 48, 175-187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Muhammad, A.K.P. and Anam, I. (2017) The Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility, Job Satisfaction, and Organizational Commitment: Case of Pakistani Higher Education. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 2352-2363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 马晨, 周祖城. 感知的企业社会责任对员工态度的影响: 自尊的调节效应[J]. 系统管理学报, 2017, 26(2): 295-301, 310.
[8] Duygu, T. (2009) How Corporate Social Responsibility Influences Organizational Commitment. Journal of Business Ethics, 89, 189-204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] 赵德志, 佟蓬晖. 企业履行社会责任对员工组织承诺的影响——心理资本为中介变量[J]. 经济研究导刊, 2018(6): 15-21, 93.
[10] 刘远, 周祖城. 员工感知的企业社会责任、情感承诺与组织公民行为的关系——承诺型人力资源实践的跨层调节作用[J]. 管理评论, 2015, 27(10): 118-127.
[11] 宣丽燕, Ghorbani, M. 三人成虎: 工作场所八卦如何影响感知企业社会责任与组织公民行为之间的关系——一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 中国人力资源开发, 2018, 35(6): 17-29.
[12] 刘凤军, 李敬强, 杨丽丹. 企业社会责任、道德认同与员工组织公民行为关系研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2017(6): 117-129.
[13] 周念华, 余明阳, 辛杰. 感知的企业社会责任对员工创新行为作用机制的实证研究[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2021, 33(6): 111-123.
[14] 付非, 赵迎欢. 企业社会责任、员工组织认同与员工创新行为——企业能力的调节作用[J]. 技术经济与管理研究, 2017(12): 37-41.
[15] 颜爱民, 汪玉霞, 单良. 中国文化背景下企业社会责任对建言行为的影响——基于儒家和道家工作价值观的调节作用[J]. 软科学, 2018, 32(7): 48-51.
[16] 颜爱民, 单良, 徐婷. 员工感知的企业社会责任对建言行为的作用机制研究[J]. 软科学, 2017, 31(7): 76-79+88.
[17] 郑海东, 王娜, 张音, 等. 员工企业社会责任感知对建言行为的影响机制研究: 一个双中介模型[C]//中国管理现代化研究会, 复旦管理学奖励基金会. 第十六届(2021)中国管理学年会论文集. [出版者不详], 2021: 488-496.
[18] 李歌, 颜爱民, 徐婷. 中小企业员工感知的企业社会责任对离职倾向的影响机制研究[J]. 管理学报, 2016, 13(6): 847-854.
[19] 谷慧敏, 贾卉, 赵亚星. 企业社会责任对酒店员工离职倾向影响研究: 组织认同的中介作用[J]. 中国人力资源开发, 2017(4): 47-53.
[20] Jeffrey, A.L. and Linn, V.D. (1998) Predicting Voice Behavior in Work Groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 853-868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] 章义, 严双艳. 变革型领导对员工建言行为影响的研究述评与展望[J]. 闽西职业技术学院学报, 2023, 25(1): 29-34.
[22] Blake, E.A. and Fred, M. (1989) Social Identity Theory the Organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20-39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[23] Robert, P.S. and Nestor, K.O. (1984) A Review and Me-ta-Analysis of Research on the Relationship between Behavioral Intentions and Employee Turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 673-686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] Mobley, W.H., Griffeth, W.H., Hand, H.H. and Meglino, B.M. (1979) Review and Conceptual Analysis of the Employee Turnover Process. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 493-522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[25] Mobley, W.H. (1977) Intermediate Linkages in the Relationship between Job Satisfaction and Employee Turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 237-240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[26] Griffeth, R.W., Hom, P.W. and Gaertner, S. (2000) A Me-ta-Analysis of Antecedents and Correlates of Employee Turnover: Update, Moderator Tests and Research Implica-tions for the Next Millennium. Journal of Management, 26, 463-488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[27] 张莹瑞, 佐斌. 社会认同理论及其发展[J]. 心理科学进展, 2006, 14(3): 475-480.
[28] 龙云, 夏胜, 黎赔肆. 谦卑型领导对员工绿色行为的影响: 基于认同理论的双重视角[J]. 湖南财政经济学院学报, 2021, 37(1): 103-111.
[29] 张麟, 王夏阳, 陈宏辉, 等. 企业承担社会责任对求职者会产生吸引力吗——一项基于实验的实证研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2017, 20(5): 116-130.
[30] Hair Jr., J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M. and Sarstedt, M. (2014) A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications, 307 p.
[31] Joseph, F.H.J., Christian, M.R. and Marko, S. (2011) PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet. The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19, 139-152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[32] Shiva, I. and Osman, M.K. (2017) An Examination of the Consequences of Corporate Social Responsibility in the Airline Industry: Work Engagement, Career Satisfaction and Voice Behavior. Journal of Air Transport Management, 59, 8-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[33] 晁罡, 姜胜林, 刘文松, 廖颖端. 员工感知的企业社会责任表现对员工离职的影响[J]. 华南理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2014, 16(4): 9-15.
[34] Rodger, W.G., Peter, W.H. and Stefan, G. (2000) A Meta-Analysis of Antecedents and Correlates of Employee Turnover: Update, Moderator Tests, and Research Implications for the Next Millennium. Journal of Management, 26, 463-488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef