象山近海表层沉积物特征及成因
Characteristics and Sedimentary Origin of the Surface Sediment in the Xiangshan Offshore Area
DOI: 10.12677/AMS.2023.102014, PDF,   
作者: 李金铎, 余海俊:国家海洋局宁波海洋环境监测中心站,浙江 宁波
关键词: 表层沉积物粒度分析成因象山近海 Surface Sediment Grain Size Provenance Xiangshan Offshore Sea Area
摘要: 根据象山近海沉积物现场地质采样和粒度分析成果,对其特征和成因进行了探讨。结果表明,研究区表层沉积类型以粘土质粉砂为主,砂、粉砂和粘土粒级含量分别为5%~10%、65%~75%和20%~25%,平均粒径大多数在6.00 φ~7.00 φ (0.016~0.008 mm)之间,分选较差。沉积物由近岸到外海呈现粗–细–粗的总体分布格局,西北近岸海域沉积物类型变化稍大,东南侧外部海域沉积物较为统一。频率曲线呈弱正偏态到常态,峰态较宽平的单峰型为主,峰值在4 φ~7 φ之间。概率曲线可分2~4段。沉积动力分区图显示水动力条件较弱。粒级–标准差曲线识别出四个峰值区,6 μm和29 μm附近峰值突出,说明研究区沉积物主要来源于长江入海物质向南输运沉积;460 μm和1 μm附近峰值较弱,分别代表本地海岸岛屿侵蚀物质和外海物质漂移的影响。
Abstract: According to the data of grain size and characteristics of the surficial sediments in the Xiangshan offshore sea area, the type, distribution pattern and possible origin of the surface sediments are discussed. Surface sedi-ments are mainly clayey silt, in which the sand, silt and clay particles portions weight 5%~10%, 65%~75% and 20%~25%, respectively. With mean diameter of about 6.00 Φ~7.00 Φ (0.016 mm~0.008 mm, fine silt), stand deviation coefficient of about 1.60 Φ~2.10 Φ, frequency analysis displays poor sorting and weak-positive skewness with one-dominant peak value (4 Φ~7 Φ) curve. Probability distribution may be discerned 2~4 sections represented as rolling, skip and suspended sediment transportationpatterns. The Pejrup ternary diagram for sedimentary environment classi-fication shows a weak dynamics condition. Distinguished the environmental sensitive groups from the sediments by particle size standard deviation method, the dominant deposits is silt which is widespread in subaqueous delta and adjacent sea areas transported by modern coastal currents systems, while the coarse sandy and fine muddy components show the influence of local lands-islands erosion and marine transportation.
文章引用:李金铎, 余海俊. 象山近海表层沉积物特征及成因[J]. 海洋科学前沿, 2023, 10(2): 130-135. https://doi.org/10.12677/AMS.2023.102014

参考文献

[1] 刘元生, 孟庆红, 何腾兵, 罗海波, 钱晓刚. 稻田生态养鱼水质动态与水稻生长及经济效益研究[J]. 耕作与栽培, 2003(5): 5-6, 20.
[2] 吕东锋, 王武, 马旭洲, 白国福, 陈再忠, 于永清. 稻田生态养蟹的水质变化与水稻生长关系的研究[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2010(4): 233-235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] 刘忆瀚, 蔺凌云, 尹文林, 潘晓艺, 姚嘉赟, 徐洋, 沈锦玉. 微生态制剂对凡纳滨对虾生长∙酶活及养殖水质的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2020, 48(15): 96-101, 104.
[4] 李雪. 微生态菌对养渔水体水质及微生物群落结构的影响[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 沈阳: 辽宁大学, 2019.
[5] 吴保承, 沈国强, 杨春霞, 张栋. 微生态制剂在水质净化中的应用现状及展望[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2010(S2): 408-410.
[6] Gao, J., Wang, R., Liu, J.X., Wang, W.L., Chen, Y. and Cai, W.T. (2022) Effects of Novel Microecologics Combined with Traditional Chinese Medicine and Probiotics on Growth Performance and Health of Broilers. Poultry Science, 101, Article ID: 101412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Guo, H., Yu, L.L., Tian, F.W., Zhao, J.X., Zhang, H., Chen, W. and Zhai, Q.X. (2021) Effects of Bacteroides-Based Microecologics against Antibiotic-Associated Diarrhea in Mice. Micro-organisms, 9, Article 2492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Lukwambe, B., Qiuqian, L.L., Wu, J.F., Zhang, D.M., Wang, K. and Zheng, Z.M. (2015) The Effects of Commercial Microbial Agents (probiotics) on Phytoplankton Community Structure in Intensive White Shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) Aquaculture Ponds. Aquaculture International, 23, 1443-1455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] 盖建军, 矫新明, 陈焕根. 4种微生态制剂对养殖水质的影响[J]. 现代农业科技, 2013(10): 255-256.
[10] 王笃彩, 闫斌伦, 李士虎. 3种微生态制剂对养殖水体水质影响的比较研究[J]. 水生态学杂志, 2011, 32(1): 66-70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Ludwig, W. (2007) Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics and Identification. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 120, 225-236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Miao, J., Yin, Z., Yang, Y., et al. (2022) Investigation of the Microbial Community Structure and Diversity in the Environment Surrounding a Veterinary Antibiotic Production Factory. RSC Advances, 12, 1021-1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] 李思明, 丁惠君, 郭小泽, 符辉, 唐艳强, 钟家友. 复方中草药对中华绒螯蟹生长、非特异性免疫和抗病力的影响[J]. 水产科学, 2015(4): 201-207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] 阎斌伦, 王兴强, 李士虎, 王笃彩, 戴岩, 时冬晴, 徐加涛, 徐国成, 罗刚. 微生物制剂在中华绒螯蟹工厂化育苗水质调控中的应用[J]. 中国农学通报, 2005, 21(3): 329-332.
[15] Singh, U.B., Deepti, M., Wasiullah, Singh, S., Pradhan, J.K., Singh, B.P., Roy, M., Imram, M., Pathak, N., Baisyal, B.M., Rai, J.P., Sarma, B.K., Singh, R.K., Sharma, P.K., Kaur, S.D., Manna, M.C., Sharma, S.K. and Sharma, A.K. (2016) Bio-Protective Microbial Agents from Rhizosphere Eco-Systems Trigger Plant Defense Responses Provide Protection against Sheath Blight DISEASE in Rice (Oryza sativa L.). Microbiological Research, 192, 300-312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] 曾洪学, 屈兴红, 刘晓宇. 有益微生物制剂EM-2生物液肥对水稻生长的影响[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2021, 27(2): 88-89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] 李文博. 稻田综合种养对水稻产量和品质的影响[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 合肥: 安徽农业大学, 2021.
[18] 王昂. 稻蟹共作系统氮素迁移与转化特征的研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 上海: 上海海洋大学, 2018.
[19] 谷加坤. EM制剂对河蟹池塘生态养殖水体中菌群变化的影响[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2020.[CrossRef
[20] 乔振民, 韩迎亚, 刘有华, 王倩楠, 安贤惠, 李联泰. 6种微生态制剂对鲤鱼养殖水体水质的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2020, 48(12): 159-162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] 周鑫军. 水产养殖水质改良常用微生物制剂之芽孢杆菌篇[J]. 当代水产, 2015, 40(10): 93.
[22] 李南充. 微生态制剂在池塘养殖中的应用研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 咸阳: 西北农林科技大学, 2013.
[23] 张云杰. 稻蟹共生对稻田水质影响的研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 上海: 上海海洋大学, 2013.
[24] 蔡姝文. 微生物制剂在水产养殖中的作用[J]. 现代农业科技, 2014(18): 251, 270.
[25] 申祺, 李蔚然, 于小彭, 王康健, 展广军, 贺双梅, 于艳青. 稻蟹共作对稻田生物影响的研究进展[J]. 北方水稻, 2021, 51(5): 59-62.
[26] 李嘉尧, 常东, 李柏年, 吴旭干, 朱泽闻, 成永旭. 不同稻田综合种养模式的成本效益分析[J]. 水产学报, 2014, 38(9): 1431-1438.