碳交易政策下考虑消费者低碳偏好的再制造产品定价决策
Pricing Decision of Remanufactured Products Considering Low Carbon Preference of Consumers under Carbon Trading Policy
摘要: 在碳交易政策和考虑消费者低碳偏好的背景下,本文以一个制造商、一个零售商和一个回收商组成的供应链为研究对象,构建了集中决策和分散决策的Stackeberg博弈定价模型,分析碳交易政策下碳交易价格和消费者低碳偏好对零售价以及供应链利润的影响。研究表明:随着碳交易价格的增加,供应链总碳排放量会降低,集中决策的总利润会降低,分散决策下制造商的利润会随着碳交易价格的增加而增加,零售商的利润与之相反。
Abstract: In the context of carbon trading policy and consideration of consumers’ low-carbon preferences, this paper takes a supply chain consisting of a manufacturer, a retailer and a recycler as the research object, constructs Stackeberg game pricing model with centralized decision-making and decentralized decision-making, and analyzes the impacts of carbon trading price and consumers’ low-carbon preferences on retail prices and supply chain profits under carbon trading policy. The research shows that with the increase of carbon trading price, the total carbon emissions of supply chain will decrease, the total profit of centralized decision-making will decrease, and the profit of manufacturers under decentralized decision-making will increase with the increase of carbon trading price, while the profit of retailers is on the contrary.
文章引用:刘怀尚, 王文轩, 李雷. 碳交易政策下考虑消费者低碳偏好的再制造产品定价决策[J]. 运筹与模糊学, 2023, 13(3): 2464-2473. https://doi.org/10.12677/ORF.2023.133247

参考文献

[1] Entezaminia, A., Gharbi, A. and Ouhimmou, M. (2019) Environmental Hedging Point Policies for Collaborative Unreliable Manufacturing Systems with Variant Emitting Level Technologies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 250, Article ID: 119539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] 李新然, 李长浩. 消费者双重偏好下闭环供应链渠道差异研究[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2019, 39(3): 695-704.
[3] 帅传敏, 张钰坤. 中国消费者低碳产品支付意愿的差异分析——基于碳标签的情景实验数据[J]. 中国软科学, 2013(7): 61-70.
[4] 张旭, 袁旭梅, 降亚迪. 需求与碳交易价格不确定下多式联运路径优化[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2021, 41(10): 2609-2620.
[5] 郭军华, 孙林洋, 张诚, 倪明, 朱佳翔. 碳限额交易政策下考虑消费者低碳偏好的供应链定价与协调[J]. 工业工程与管理, 2020, 25(2): 134-145.
[6] 郭军华, 孙林洋, 张诚, 倪明, 朱佳翔. 碳税政策下考虑消费者低碳偏好的供应链定价与协调[J]. 系统工程, 2020, 38(6): 61-69.
[7] Lamba, K., Singh, S.P. and Mishra, N. (2019) Integrated Decisions for Supplier Selection and Lot-Sizing Considering Different Carbon Emission Reg-ulations in Big Data Environment. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 128, 1052-1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Pang, Q., Li, M., Yang, T., et al. (2018) Supply Chain Coordi-nation with Carbon Trading Price and Consumers’ Environmental Awareness Dependent Demand. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2018, Article ID: 8749251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] 夏良杰, 孔清逸, 李友东, 等. 考虑交叉持股的低碳供应链减排与定价决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(4): 70-81.
[10] 张令荣, 杨子凡, 程春琪. 碳配额交易政策下闭环供应链的减排策略选择[J]. 管理工程学报, 2022, 36(1): 172-180.
[11] Bai, Q.G., Xu, J.T. and Chauhan, S.S. (2020) Effects of Sustainability Investment and Risk Aversion on a Two-Stage Supply Chain Coordination under a Carbon Tax Policy. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 142, Article ID: 106324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] 马秋卓, 宋海清, 陈功玉. 考虑碳交易的供应链环境下产品定价与产量决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(8): 37-46.
[13] 侯玉梅, 尉芳芳. 碳权交易价格对闭环供应链定价的影响[J]. 燕山大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2013, 14(2): 103-108.
[14] Liu, Z., Anderson, T.D. and Cruz, J.M. (2012) Consumer Environmental Awareness and Competition in Two-Stage Supply Chains. European Journal of Operational Research, 218, 602-613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef