甲状腺激素在乳腺癌诊断价值中的研究
Study on the Diagnostic Value of Thyroid Hormone in Breast Cancer
DOI: 10.12677/ACM.2023.1361471, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 王丽珍, 李 军*, 王娅宁, 王童瑶, 田倩倩:石河子大学医学院第一附属医院内分泌代谢科,新疆 石河子;李思源:石河子大学医学院,新疆 石河子
关键词: 甲状腺激素乳腺癌诊断价值Thyroid Hormone Mammary Cancer Diagnostic Value
摘要: 目的:探讨甲状腺激素在乳腺癌中的诊断价值,为乳腺癌的早期诊断及明确诊断提供依据。方法:纳入2019年9月至2021年9月就诊于我院的236例女性为研究对象,根据是否患乳腺癌分为乳癌组(116例)、对照组(120例)。收集两组患者年龄、身高、体重等一般资料。计算体质指数(body mass index, BMI) = 体重(kg)/身高(m2)。罗氏全自动生化分析仪检测胆固醇(TC)、甘油三脂(TG)等肝肾功、血脂指标。电化学发光免疫测定法检测甲状腺功能指标。Spearman法分析TSH、FT3、FT4与乳腺癌最大直径及淋巴结转移的相关性。Logistic回归分析乳腺癌的影响因素。采用受试者工作特征曲线(receiver operating characteristic, ROC)分析甲状腺激素在乳腺癌患者中的诊断价值。结果:乳癌组与对照组相比,年龄、BMI、WHR等基线资料比较差异无统计学意义[52 (49, 58) vs (53 ± 10);25 (23, 27) vs 25 (22, 27),0.90 (0.85, 0.95) vs 0.89 (0.82, 0.94),均P > 0.05]。乳腺癌组TG、TC高于对照组[1.56 (1.10, 2.07) vs 1.18 (0.84, 1.40);(4.80 ± 1.06) vs 4.27 (3.98, 4.6),均P < 0.05]。乳癌组TSH高于对照组[3.26 (2.12, 6.51) vs 2.49 (1.77, 3.60), P < 0.05],FT4低于对照组[(14.49 ± 3.39) vs (16.47 ± 2.54), P < 0.05]。乳腺癌分层比较,与I~II期相比、III~IV期TSH、FT3、FT4差异无统计学意义[3.09 (2.09, 6.33) vs 4.44 (2.23, 17.24);4.53 (4.09, 4.96) vs (4.12 ± 1.08);(14.61 ± 3.19) vs (13.80 ± 4.43),均P > 0.05]。Spearman相关性分析显示,乳腺癌最大直径与TSH (r = 0.203, P = 0.029)呈正相关;淋巴结转移与TSH (r = 0.189, P = 0.042)呈正相关,与FT4 (r = −0.345, P = 0.000)负相关。Logistic回归结果显示,TC (OR: 2.031)、TG (OR: 2.318)、TSH (OR: 1.257)升高是乳腺癌发生的危险因素,FT4 (OR: 0.807)降低是乳腺癌的危险因素。FT4诊断乳腺癌的受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)显示,TSH诊断乳腺癌的AUC为0.642,截断值为4.055 mIU/L,敏感度为0.414,特异度为0.942;FT4诊断乳腺癌的AUC为0.691,截断值为15.475 pmmol/L,敏感度为0.647,特异度为0.675。结论:TSH升高、FT4降低是乳腺癌发生的危险因素。当TSH > 4.055 mIU/L时,为乳腺癌的明确诊断提供依据;当FT4 < 15.475 pmmol/L时,为乳腺癌的早期诊断提供依据。
Abstract: Objective: To explore the diagnostic value of thyroid hormone in breast cancer, and to provide basis for early diagnosis and definite diagnosis of breast cancer. Methods: 236 women in our hospital from September 2019 to September 2021 were included as the research objects. They were divided into the breast cancer group (116 cases) and the control group (120 cases) according to whether they had breast cancer or not. The age, height, weight and other general data of the two groups were collected. Calculate body mass index (BMI) = weight (kg)/height (m2). Roche automatic biochemical analyzer detects cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG) and other indexes of liver and kidney function and blood lipid. The indexes of thyroid function were detected by electrochemiluminescence im-munoassay. Spearman method was used to analyze the correlation between TSH, FT3, FT4 and the maximum diameter and lymph node metastasis of breast cancer. Logistic regression was used to analyze the influencing factors of breast cancer. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) was used to analyze the diagnostic value of thyroid hormone in patients with breast cancer. Results: There was no significant difference in baseline data such as age, BMI, and WHR between the breast cancer group and the control group [52 (49, 58) vs (53 ± 10); 25 (23, 27) vs 25 (22, 27), 0.90 (0.85, 0.95) vs 0.89 (0.82, 0.94), both P > 0.05]. The TG and TC of the breast cancer group were higher than those in the control group [1.56 (1.10, 2.07) vs 1.18 (0.84, 1.40); (4.80 ± 1.06) vs 4.27 (3.98, 4.6), all P < 0.05]. TSH in breast cancer group was higher than that in control group [3.26 (2.12, 6.51) vs 2.49 (1.77, 3.60), P < 0.05], and FT4 was lower than that in control group [(14.49 ± 3.39) vs (16.47 ± 2.54), P < 0.05]. There was no significant difference in TSH, FT3 and FT4 between stage I~II and stage III~IV breast cancer [3.09 (2.09, 6.33) vs 4.44 (2.23, 17.24); 4.53 (4.09, 4.96) vs (4.12 ± 1.08); (14.61 ± 3.19) vs (13.80 ± 4.43), both P > 0.05]. Spearman correlation analysis showed that the maximum diameter of breast cancer was positively correlated with TSH (r = 0.203, P = 0.029); Lymph node metastasis was positively correlated with TSH (r = 0.189, P = 0.042) and negatively correlated with FT4 (r = −0.345, P = 0.000). Logistic regression results showed that the increase of TC (OR: 2.031), TG (OR: 2.318) and TSH (OR: 1.257) was the risk factor of breast cancer, and the de-crease of FT4 (OR: 0.807) was the risk factor of breast cancer. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) of breast cancer diagnosed by FT4 showed that the AUC of breast cancer diagnosed by TSH was 0.642, the cut-off value was 4.055 mIU/L, the sensitivity was 0.414, and the specificity was 0.942; The AUC of FT4 in the diagnosis of breast cancer was 0.691, the cut-off value was 15.475 pmmol/l, the sensitivity was 0.647, and the specificity was 0.675. Conclusion: The increase of TSH and the decrease of FT4 are the risk factors of breast cancer. When TSH > 4.055 mIU/L, it provides a basis for the definite diagnosis of breast cancer; When FT4 < 15.475 pmmol/L, it can provide basis for early diagnosis of breast cancer.
文章引用:王丽珍, 李军, 李思源, 王娅宁, 王童瑶, 田倩倩. 甲状腺激素在乳腺癌诊断价值中的研究[J]. 临床医学进展, 2023, 13(6): 10515-10522. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2023.1361471

参考文献

[1] 方媛, 李艳霞, 等. 甲状腺功能减退与乳腺癌发病相关性的Meta分析[J]. 临床医学研究与实践, 2018, 3(7): 4-6+9.
[2] 中国早期乳腺癌卵巢功能抑制临床应用专家共识(2021年版) [J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2022, 32(2): 177-190.
[3] 胡迪, 胡樱, 张嫣然, 魏俏俏. 1990-2019年中、印、日、美50岁以上女性高BMI乳腺癌疾病负担的年龄-时期-队列分析[J]. 现代预防医学, 2022, 49(18): 3265-3270+3293.
[4] 田甜, 张淑群. 甲状腺激素及其受体与乳腺癌的关系[J]. 现代肿瘤医学, 2016, 24(9): 1483-1486.
[5] 侯天. 乳腺癌相关内分泌激素的研究进展[J]. 世界最新医学信息文摘(电子版), 2014(9): 28.
[6] 张义丹. 甲状腺激素及其受体与乳腺癌关系研究进展[J]. 当代医学, 2017, 23(33): 183-184.
[7] 张明, 高力英. 乳腺癌与甲状腺疾病和功能关系的研究进展[J]. 甘肃医药, 2017, 36(10): 820-823.
[8] Zyla, L.E., Cano, R., Gómez, S., et al. (2021) Effects of Thyroxine on Apoptosis and Proliferation of Mammary Tumors. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, 538, Article ID: 111454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] 袁曦, 刘浪浪, 等. 甲状腺功能正常的2型糖尿病患者血清促甲状腺激素水平与糖化血红蛋白达标相关性分析[J]. 陕西医学杂志, 2022, 51(3): 303-307.
[10] 陈文娟, 王邦龙, 等. 中国女性乳腺癌发病可控危险因素的Meta分析[J]. 深圳中西医结合杂志, 2020, 30(24): 14-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] 邹天宁, 汤学良, 聂建云, 周绍强. 乳腺癌首次治疗不当原因和后果分析[J]. 肿瘤防治杂志, 2000, 7(5): 481-482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] 赵英杰, 张荷焕. 甲状腺乳腺疾病相关性的研究进展[J]. 中国医药导报, 2018, 15(32): 46-49.
[13] 左卫星, 张志飞, 刘志民, 王超群. 参与下丘脑-垂体-甲状腺轴负反馈调控的分子元件研究进展[J]. 生物技术进展, 2017, 7(6): 601-607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] 高洁, 迪丽达尔∙木汗哈力, 凌雁, 高鑫. 2型糖尿病患者亚临床甲状腺功能减退与心血管疾病的相关性[J]. 中华糖尿病杂志, 2018, 10(3): 221-225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Roos, A., Bakker, S.J., Links, T.P., Gans, R.O.B. and Wolffenbuttel, B.H.R. (2007) Thyroid Function Is Associated with Components of the Metabolic Syndrome in Eu-thyroid Subject. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 92, 491-496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Arimura, H., Askoro, R., Fujio, S., Ummah, F.C., et al. (2019) A Thy-roid-Stimulating Hormone (TSH) Producing Adenoma in a Patient with Severe Hypothyroidism: Thyroxine Replacement Reduced the TSH Level and Tumor Size. NMC Case Report Journal, 7, 17-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Zheng, J., Li, C., Lu, W., Wang, C. and Ai, Z. (2016) Quantita-tive Assessment of Pre-Operative Serum Thyrotropin Level and Thyroid Cancer. Oncotarget, 7, 34918-34929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] 刘勇. 血清甲状腺激素水平和乳腺癌的相关性分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 广州: 广州医科大学, 2020.[CrossRef