短视频作品信息网络传播权侵权损害赔偿探析
Analysis on Infringement Damages of Short Video Works Information Network Dissemination Right
摘要: 随着5G、云计算、人工智能的迅速发展和互联网的普及,短视频作品日渐广泛,由于传播模式的特殊性,其涉及的法律关系更为复杂,由此所引起的侵权行为、侵权责任的认定以及侵权损害赔偿等问题都给传统的著作权法带来了很大的挑战。我国短视频作品信息网络传播权侵权案件纷繁复杂,基于立法和司法中存在法定赔偿顺序僵硬、法定赔偿泛化且赔偿数额小、司法实践中侵权主体的责任判定不明、司法认定缺乏有效证据的问题,从立法和司法实践入手,首先,调整《著作权法》第54条的赔偿方式,增加权利人自由选择权。其次,详细考虑法定赔偿因素,区分赔偿数额和合理必要支出。最后,明确网络用户和网络服务提供者不同主体的归责原则,法院加强对损害赔偿的证据指引,以期更好地保护我国短视频作品的信息网络传播权。
Abstract:
With the rapid development of 5G, cloud computing, artificial intelligence and the popularity of the Internet, short video works are becoming more and more widely. Due to the particularity of the communication mode, the legal relationship involved is more complex. The resulting infringement, the identification of tort liability and the compensation for tort damages have brought great challenges to the traditional indigenous copyright law. The infringement cases of the right to information network dissemination of short video works in China are complicated. Based on the problems existing in the legislation and judicature, such as the rigid sequence of legal compensation, the generalization of legal compensation and the small amount of compensation, the unclear determination of the responsibility of the subject of infringement in judicial practice, and the lack of effective evidence in judicial cognizance, starting from the legislation and judicial practice, first of all, the compensation mode of article 54 of the “Indigenous Rights Law” is adjusted to increase the right of free choice of the obligee. Secondly, considering the legal compensation factors in detail, distinguish the amount of compensation and reasonable necessary expenditure. Finally, the imputation principle of different subjects of network users and network service providers is clarified, and the court strengthens the evidence guidance on damage compensation in order to better protect the information network communication right of short video works in China.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
CNNIC发布第51次《中国互联网络发展状况统计报告》[J]. 互联网天地, 2023(3): 3.
|
|
[2]
|
陈绍玲. 短视频版权纠纷解决的制度困境及突破[J]. 知识产权, 2021(9): 17-30.
|
|
[3]
|
孙山. 短视频的独创性与著作权法保护的路径[J]. 知识产权, 2019(4): 44-49.
|
|
[4]
|
刘杨东, 侯婉颖. 论信息网络传播权的刑事保护路径[J]. 法学, 2013(7): 155-160.
|
|
[5]
|
郭瑞达. 信息网络传播权的保护研究——以著作权法修订为背景[J]. 南方论刊, 2021(6): 69-71.
|
|
[6]
|
2021年中国短视频版权保护白皮书[N]. 中国新闻出版广电报, 2021-05-20(008).
|
|
[7]
|
周扬, 梁珺怡. MOBA类游戏连续动态画面及其短视频利用的性质认定——深圳市腾讯计算机系统有限公司诉运城市某光文化传媒有限公司、广州某视网络科技有限公司侵害作品信息网络传播权及不正当竞争纠纷案[J].法治论坛, 2021(1): 353-354.
|
|
[8]
|
吴汉东. 知识产权侵权诉讼中的过错责任推定与赔偿数额认定——以举证责任规则为视角[J]. 法学评论, 2014, 32(5): 126-128.
|