宿州市快速路两侧土壤重金属污染及生态评价
Heavy Metal Pollution and Ecological Assessment of Soil on Both Sides of Suzhou Expressway
摘要: 为了解宿州市宿州大道两侧土壤重金属污染的程度，进而对道路土壤重金属进行生态评价，本文选取了宿州大道两侧比较有代表性的路段，设置了29个采样点，并对土壤进行了采样和分析。对处理好的样品压片进行了XRF荧光光谱仪的实验，并对其进行重金属元素含量分析、负荷指数分析和污染评价。样品的分析结果表明：8种重金属元素的变化率均高于安徽土壤背景值，其中，Cu的变化率高于44.0%，Co的变化率高于30%，两种元素的平均分布存在明显的不同。此外，Fe、Zn、Mn、Pb的含量均高于安徽土壤背景值，一些地方的Cu、Cr、Co含量也高于安徽土壤背景值。污染负荷指数表明：宿州大道该段两侧总体来说属于中等污染范围，部分地点属于无污染范围，但是在道路两侧不同采样距离中，重金属污染负荷指数变化趋势相反，即随着距离的增大，污染负荷指数减小，说明宿州大道两侧土壤环境质量受人类活动的影响作用明显。
Abstract: In order to understand the degree of heavy metal pollution in the soil on both sides of Suzhou Avenue in Suzhou City and conduct an ecological evaluation of heavy metals in road soil, we selected representative sections on both sides of Suzhou Avenue, set up 29 sampling points, and conducted soil sampling and analysis. The processed samples were subjected to XRF fluorescence spectrometer experiments, and heavy metal element content analysis, load index analysis, and pollution evaluation were conducted. The analysis results of the samples show that the change rates of the eight heavy metal elements are all higher than the background values of the soil in Anhui. Among them, the change rate of Cu is higher than 44.0%, and the change rate of Co is higher than 30%. There is a significant difference in the average distribution of the two elements. In addition, the content of Fe, Zn, Mn, and Pb is higher than the background value of Anhui soil, and the content of Cu, Cr, and Co in some places is also higher than the background value of Anhui soil. The pollution load index indicates that both sides of Suzhou Avenue are generally within the moderate pollution range, and some locations are within the pollution-free range. However, in different sampling distances on both sides of the road, the trend of heavy metal pollution load index changes is opposite, that is, with the increase of distance, the pollution load index decreases, indicating that the soil environmental quality on both sides of Suzhou Avenue is significantly influenced by human activities.
文章引用：杜汇玉, 汪玲. 宿州市快速路两侧土壤重金属污染及生态评价[J]. 自然科学, 2023, 11(4): 598-606. https://doi.org/10.12677/OJNS.2023.114071

参考文献

[1] 丛艳国, 魏立华. 土壤环境重金属污染物来源的现状分析[J]. 现代化农业, 2002(1): 18-20.
[2] 高文邦. 省道104公路一侧土壤重金属和基本化学性质研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古师范大学, 2018.
[3] 穆德苗, 陈艳秋, 胡涛, 等. 基于田块尺度的农田土壤重金属污染评价及来源解析[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2022, 41(6): 1271-1283.
[4] 张小敏, 张秀英, 钟太洋, 等. 中国农田土壤重金属富集状况及其空间分布研究[J]. 环境科学, 2014, 35(2): 692-703.
[5] 滕应, 黄昌勇. 重金属污染土壤的微生物生态效应及其修复研究进展[J]. 土壤与环境, 2002, 11(1): 85-89.
[6] 陈满怀. 土壤植物系统中的重金属污染[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1996.
[7] 冯光, 张昌全, 史学正, 等. 土地资源持续利用与技术[M]. 北京: 中国大地出版社, 1998: 33-37.
[8] 王学军, 席爽. 北京东郊污灌区土壤重金属含量的克立格插值法及重金属污染评价[J]. 中国环境科学学报, 1997, 17(3): 34-37.
[9] 卢瑛, 龚子同, 张甘霖. 南京城市土壤Pb的含量及其化学形态[J]. 环境科学学报, 2002, 22(2): 156-160.
[10] 吴新民, 李恋卿, 潘根兴, 等. 南京市不同功能城区土壤中重金属Cu、Zn、Pb和Cd的污染特征[J]. 环境科学, 2003, 24(3): 105-111.
[11] 陈同斌, 宋波, 郑袁明, 等. 北京市蔬菜和菜地土壤砷含量及其健康风险分析[J]. 地理学报, 2006, 61(3): 297-310.
[12] 郑袁明, 陈同斌, 陈煌, 等. 北京市不同土地利用方式下土壤铅的积累[J]. 地理学报, 2005, 60(5): 791-797.
[13] 马建华, 李剑. 郑汴公路路尘、路沟底泥和路旁土壤重金属分布[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2008, 43(2): 285-291.
[14] 李湘洲. 机动车尾气对土壤铅累积的影响及分布格局[J]. 南林学院学报, 2001, 21(4): 36-39.
[15] 单爱琴, 张威, 周洪英, 等. 徐州市不同功能区重金属污染与健康风险评价[J]. 环境工程, 2016, 34(9): 125-129.
[16] 李琦, 黄淑玲. 宿州朱仙庄煤矿区黄豆作物的重金属健康风险评价[J]. 皖西学院学报, 2015, 31(2): 91-94+108.
[17] 姚锋先, 易艳红, 廖雅汶, 等. 赣南地区设施菜地土壤重金属污染特征及潜在生态风险评估[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2022, 44(5): 1317-1328.
[18] Hankinson, L. (1980) An Ecological Risk Index for Aquatic Pollution Control Sedimentological Approach. Water Research, 14, 975-1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[19] 中国环境监测总站. 中国土壤元素背景值[M]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 1990.
[20] 刘文婷. 扬州市城区道路两侧土壤和灰尘中重金属污染研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2011.
[21] 迟清华, 鄢明才. 应用地球化学元素丰度数据手册[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2007: 80-88.
[22] Liu, E., Yan, T., Birch, G., et al. (2014) Pollution and Health Risk of Potentially Toxic Metals in Urban Road Dust in Nanjing, a Mega-City of China. Science of the Total Environment, 476, 522-531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] 曹媛媛, 张先宝, 刘想, 等. 镇江市某工业园区企业周边土壤重金属污染及其潜在生态风险评价[J]. 生物化工, 2021, 7(6): 122-125.