网络侵权“通知–删除”规则适用研究
Study on the Application of the “Notice-and-Remove” Rule for Online Infringement
摘要: 网络的更迭催发了海量多样的网络侵权行为,“通知–删除”规则愈发重要,因此《民法典》制定过程中对其制度框架进行了重大调整。但该制度在运行的过程中显露出些许不足:各法院及学者对云服务商、小程序商等新型网络服务提供者的责任认定存在分歧,重复侵权现象仍数见不鲜,通知–删除规则被权利人、网络服务提供者以及网络用户滥用,错误通知规制不完善等问题久悬不决,为司法实践带来诸多困难。对此本文建议应尽快明确新型网络服务提供者的责任并完善错误通知与反通知规则,适当提高网络服务提供者的审查义务并加强其注意义务,实名认证制度也应尽快强化落实,以此来平衡各方利益。
Abstract:
The notice-and-removal rule has become increasingly important as the Internet has given rise to a huge variety of online infringements, and the institutional framework was therefore significantly adjusted during the development of The Civil Code. However, the system has revealed some shortcomings in the course of its operation: courts and scholars have disagreed on the liability of new online service providers such as cloud service providers and applet providers, repeated infringements are still common, the notice-and-delete rule has been abused by right holders, online service providers and online users, and the regulation of wrongful notices has been left unresolved for a long time, bringing many difficulties to judicial practice. In this regard, this paper suggests that the liability of new network service providers should be clarified as soon as possible and the rules of error notification and counter-notification should be improved, the duty of review of network service providers should be appropriately increased and their duty of care should be strengthened, and the real-name authentication system should be strengthened and implemented as soon as possible, so as to balance the interests of all parties.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
吴伟光. 视频网站在用户版权侵权中的责任承担——有限的安全港与动态中的平衡[J]. 知识产权, 2008, 18(4): 62-69.
|
|
[2]
|
周学峰. “通知-移除”规则的应然定位与相关制度构造[J]. 比较法研究, 2019(6): 21-35.
|
|
[3]
|
宋海燕. “避风港”原则何去何从——论欧盟及美国对在线内容分享服务商侵权责任的立法改革及趋势[J]. 中国版权, 2020(6): 3.
|
|
[4]
|
周伟萌. “避风港”何以避风?——我国网络交易平台商标侵权案件适用避风港规则的具体路径[J]. 社会科学家, 2021(5): 115-120.
|
|
[5]
|
薛军. 民法典网络侵权条款研究: 以法解释论框架的重构为中心[J]. 比较法研究, 2020(4): 131-144.
|
|
[6]
|
蔡元臻, 白睿成. 云计算服务平台适用避风港规则的局限性及其破解[J]. 知识产权, 2020(4): 42-52.
|
|
[7]
|
孔祥俊. “互联网条款”对于新类型网络服务的适用问题——从“通知删除”到“通知加采取必要措施”[J]. 政法论丛, 2020(1): 52-66.
|
|
[8]
|
刘佳佳, 冯刚, 刘维. 云计算服务提供者侵权的责任边界在哪里? [J]. 中国版权, 2019(5): 105-108.
|
|
[9]
|
姚震. 论“通知-删除”规则对云服务器提供商的豁免——兼议“转权利人通知” [J]. 南通大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 36(5): 61-70.
|