交通流运行状态下道路交通风险评价方法
Road Traffic Risk Evaluation Method under Traffic Flow Operation State
DOI: 10.12677/OJTT.2023.124032, PDF,   
作者: 王立明*:浙江数智交院科技股份有限公司,浙江 杭州;杨舒天:广州汽车集团股份有限公司汽车工程研究院,广东 广州
关键词: 交通风险评价风险驾驶行为行为强度风险等级Traffic Risk Evaluation Risky Driving Behavior Behavior Intensity Risk Level
摘要: 精确的道路交通风险评价是实现道路交通风险预警及主动防控的基础。本文首先基于交通流运行数据对交通流运行状态下的风险驾驶行为进行识别并根据车辆运动属性计算得到了风险驾驶行为的行为强度;然后将待评价道路等距划分为80个待评价路段,完成了不同时空状态下的风险驾驶行为匹配,根据各路段风险驾驶行为强度分布差异,提出了基于K-means++算法的道路交通风险等级划分模型,用于交通流运行状态下的道路交通风险评价。
Abstract: Accurate road traffic risk evaluation is the basis for realizing road traffic risk warning and active prevention and control. The paper firstly identifies the risky driving behavior under the traffic flow operation state based on the traffic flow operation data and calculates the behavior intensity of the risky driving behavior based on the vehicle movement attributes; then divides the road to be evaluated into 80 equal distance sections to be evaluated, completes the risky driving behavior matching under different spatial and temporal states, and proposes a model based on K-means++ algorithm-based road traffic risk classification model was proposed to realize the task of road traffic risk evaluation under the traffic flow operation state.
文章引用:王立明, 杨舒天. 交通流运行状态下道路交通风险评价方法[J]. 交通技术, 2023, 12(4): 290-298. https://doi.org/10.12677/OJTT.2023.124032

参考文献

[1] 王雪松, 宋洋, 黄合来, 张丹云. 基于分层负二项模型的城郊公路安全影响因素研究[J]. 中国公路学报, 2014, 27(1): 100-106.
[2] 杨沙. 城市道路交通安全风险评价指标体系研究与应用[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 西安: 西安科技大学, 2020.
[3] 蔡晓禹, 雷财林, 彭博, 唐小勇, 高志刚. 基于驾驶行为和信息熵的道路交通风险预估[J]. 中国公路学报, 2020, 33(6): 190-201.
[4] 孙剑, 孙杰. 城市快速路实时交通流运行安全主动风险评估[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 42(6): 873-879.
[5] Katicha, S., Khoury, J. and Flintsch, G. (2021) Spatial Multiresolution Analysis Approach to Identify Crash Hotspots and Estimate Crash Risk. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems Archive, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Xu, C.C., Liu, P., Wang, W. and Li, Z.B. (2012) Evaluation of the Impacts of Traffic States on Crash Risks on Freeways. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 47, 734-742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Park, S.H., Jang, K.T., Kim, D.K. and Kang, S.M. (2015) Spatial Evaluation of Roadway Infrastructure for Safety Improvement on Expressways. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 764-765, 1366-1369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Hu, Y.P., Li, Y., Huang, H.L., Lee, J.Y., Yuan, C. and Zou, G.Q. (2021) A High-Resolution Trajectory Data Driven Method for Real-Time Evaluation of Traffic Safety. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 165, Article ID: 106503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Ellison, A.B., Greaves, S.P. and Bliemer, M.C.J. (2015) Driver Behaviour Profiles for Road Safety Analysis. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 76, 118-132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Bagdadi, O. and Várhelyi, A. (2013) Development of a Method for Detecting Jerks in Safety Critical Events. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 50, 83-91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]