信息结构视角下表情符号【皱眉】的语用功能及礼貌信息传递
The Pragmatic Functions and Politeness Information Transmission of Emoticon: [Frown] from the Perspective of Information Structure
摘要: 本文主要探究了表情符号【皱眉】在话轮后时，且当说话人不完全遵守礼貌原则的情况下，具有什么样的语用功能？表情符号【皱眉】的使用是否会对话语意义以及礼貌信息的传递产生影响？本文发现，表情符号【皱眉】的使用极大程度上影响了话语意义的表达和礼貌信息的传递：当说话人表面上遵守礼貌原则，实际上不完全遵守礼貌原则的情况下，【皱眉】具有阻断功能，阻断不礼貌信息的传递；当说话人表面上不完全遵守礼貌原则，实际上遵守礼貌原则的情况下，表情符号同样具有阻断功能，阻断礼貌信息的传递，使其成为反语。其次，本研究从信息结构的角度出发，探究文字符号与表情符号所传递的礼貌/不礼貌信息是如何交互以推进交际的顺利进行。
Abstract: This article explores what the pragmatic functions of the emoticon [frown] are when it is used after the turn of speech and when the speaker does not fully comply with the politeness principle. Does the use of the emoticon [frown] have an impact on the meaning of the discourse and the transmission of politeness messages? This paper finds that the use of the emoticon [frown] greatly affects the expression of discourse meaning and the transmission of politeness information: when the speaker appears to comply with the politeness principle but actually does not fully comply with it, [frown] displays the blocking function; when the speaker appears to not fully comply with the politeness principle but actually does comply with it, the emoticon also displays the blocking function. Secondly, this study explores how the politeness/impoliteness information conveyed by literal signs and emoticons interact to advance the smooth flow of communication from the perspective of information structure.
文章引用：张诺. 信息结构视角下表情符号【皱眉】的语用功能及礼貌信息传递[J]. 现代语言学, 2023, 11(7): 2999-3007. https://doi.org/10.12677/ML.2023.117408

参考文献

[1] Leech, G. N. (1983) Principles of Pragmatics. Routledge, London.
[2] Goffman, E. (1967) Interactional Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behaviour. Doubleday and Company, New York.
[3] Brown, P. and Levinson, S. (1978) Universals in Language Usage: Politeness Phenomenon. In: Goody, E.N., Ed., Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 56-289.
[4] 刘润清. 关于Leech的“礼貌原则” [J]. 外语教学与研究(外国语文双月刊), 1987(2): 42-46, 80.
[5] 高航. 礼貌现象研究评介[J]. 解放军外语学院学报, 1996(2): 9-15, 125.
[6] 何恒幸. 对方中心论[J]. 外语学刊, 1994(3): 6-10.
[7] 熊学亮, 刘国辉. 也谈礼貌原则[J]. 四川外语学院学报, 2002, 18(3): 60-62.
[8] 束定芳, 王虹. 言语交际中的扬升抑降与礼貌原则[J]. 外国语, 1993(3): 9-15, 82.
[9] 王建华. 礼貌的相对性[J]. 外国语, 1998(3): 19-23.
[10] 顾曰国. 礼貌、语用与文化[J]. 外语教学与研究(外国语文双月刊), 1992(4): 10-17, 80.
[11] 余光武, 秦云. 语言学视角下的网络表情符号初探[J]. 中国社会科学院研究生院学报, 2011(1): 130-135.
[12] 沈念芦. 中英文表情符号“笑CRY”功能意义对比研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 北京邮电大学, 2018.
[13] 唐师瑶. Q时代的交际想象——QQ表情符号的构形规律及功能初探[J]. 现代语文(语言研究), 2006(8): 82-83.
[14] 王珩, 纪文亮. 微信表情符号及语用功能探析[J]. 青年记者, 2018(32): 93-94.
[15] Halliday, M. (1967) Notes on Transitivity and Theme in English: Part 2. Journal of Linguistics, 3, 199-244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[16] 尚新. 时量动宾句构“V + T(de) + N”的信息结构透视及实验证据[J]. 外国语, 2020, 43(5): 46-60.
[17] Lambrecht, K. (1994) Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[18] 陆丙甫. “的”的基本功能和派生功能——从描写性到区别性再到指称性[J]. 世界汉语教学, 2003(1): 14-29.
[19] 陆丙甫. 再谈汉语“的”和日语の的区别[J]. 外国语, 2008, 31(3): 55-63.
[20] 陆俭明. 重视语言信息结构研究开拓语言研究的新视野[J]. 当代修辞学, 2017(4): 1-17.
[21] 屈承熹. 信息结构的基本概念及其在现代汉语中的表达形式[J]. 汉语学习, 2018(2): 3-14.
[22] 刘丹青. “有”字领有句的语义倾向和信息结构[J]. 中国语文, 2011(2): 99-109.
[23] 朴珍, 张钦钦, 李妍. 词类序列“V + N1 + N2”的多功能性及信息结构的制约作用[J]. 语言教学与研究, 2019(5): 62-71.
[24] 毕罗莎, 潘海华.信息结构理论与汉语双宾结构的内部差异[J]. 外国语(上海外国语大学学报), 2019, 42(1): 39-49.