“正常经营买受人”规则与善意取得的逻辑疏证
Logic Analysis on Regulatory Regime of Good Faith Acquisition and Rule of “Buyer in Ordinary Course”
摘要: “正常经营买受人”规则与善意取得制度的关系构建中,“正常经营买受人”规则是善意取得制度的特殊情形,善意取得制度涵盖“正常经营买受人”规则。“正常经营买受人”规则作为善意取得的附属制度,“正常经营活动”为买受人识别权利归属的事实依据,“正常经营活动”为善意取得中“善意”的表征之一。
Abstract:
To define the relationship between rule of buyer in ordinary course and regulatory regime of good faith acquisition, the rule of buyer in ordinary course is one of a special circumstance of regulatory regime of good faith acquisition, the regulatory regime of good faith acquisition covers over the rule of buyer in ordinary course. As an affiliated rule of regulatory regime of good faith acquisition, buyer in ordinary course is the factual basis for buyers identifying the attribution of rights, which is also the appearance of good faith in regulatory regime of good faith acquisition.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
李莉. 论动产抵押权善意取得制度的登记要件[J]. 东方法学, 2018(4): 56-63.
|
|
[2]
|
张素华, 李鸣捷. 《民法典》“正常经营买受人规则”的解释论[J]. 北方法学, 2021(3): 5-18.
|
|
[3]
|
郝秀辉, 王锡柱. 民用航空器适用善意取得制度的可行性辨析[J]. 烟台大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2015(5): 54-62.
|
|
[4]
|
汪志刚. 准不动产物权变动与对抗[J]. 中外法学, 2011(5): 1031-1033.
|
|
[5]
|
莫杨燊. 《民法典》动产抵押权登记对抗规则的解释论[J]. 中国海商法研究, 2022, 33(1): 68-80.
|
|
[6]
|
王洪亮. 动产抵押登记效力规则的独立性解析[J]. 法学, 2009(11): 88-98.
|
|
[7]
|
庄加园. 登记对抗主义的反思与改造: 《物权法》第24条解析[J]. 中国法学, 2018(1): 207-211.
|
|
[8]
|
韩强. 我国船舶物权的变动公示方法与善意取得[J]. 法学, 2008(11): 116-122.
|
|
[9]
|
刘竞元. 民法典动产担保的发展及其法律适用[J]. 法学家, 2021(1): 59-67.
|
|
[10]
|
崔艳峰. 物权公示与善意取得之辩证[J]. 法学杂志, 2016(6): 125-132.
|
|
[11]
|
崔建远. 机动车物权的变动辨析[J]. 环球法律评论, 2014(2): 33-46.
|
|
[12]
|
李莉. 浮动抵押权人优先受偿范围限制规则研究[J]. 西南政法大学学报, 2014(3): 43-51.
|