个人私密信息侵权归责原则适用研究
Research on the Application of the Principle of Liability for Infringement of Personal Confidential Information
摘要: 《个人信息保护法》与《民法典》均规定了侵害个人私密信息的归责原则,差别在于前者适用过错推定原则,后者将其定义为一般侵权,适用过错责任原则。两者对私密信息保护难免发生重叠,然基于信息主体与侵权主体之间强弱地位的不平等,信息主体对主观过错要件的证明难度较大,故为有效保护信息主体的合法权益,构建其与侵权主体之间利益的平衡性,个人私密信息侵权应优先适用过错推定原则,由侵权主体证明其在信息处理中无主观过错。
Abstract:
The Personal Information Protection Law and the Civil Code both stipulate the principle of liability for infringement of personal confidential information. The difference is that the former applies the principle of fault presumption, while the latter defines it as general infringement and applies the principle of fault liability. The protection of private information between the two is inevitably overlapping. However, due to the unequal status between the information subject and the infringing party, it is difficult for the information subject to prove the subjective fault elements. Therefore, in order to effectively protect the legitimate rights and interests of the information subject and establish a balance of interests between them and the infringing party, the principle of fault presumption should be applied first in personal private information infringement, and the infringing party should prove that they have no subjective fault in information processing.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
民事审判理论专业委员会. 民法典人格权编条文理解与司法适用[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2020.
|
|
[2]
|
张新宝. 个人信息收集: 告知同意原则适用的限制[J]. 比较法研究, 2019, 166(6): 1-20.
|
|
[3]
|
王利明. 敏感个人信息保护的基本问题——以《民法典》和《个人信息保护法》的解释为背景[J]. 当代法学, 2022, 36(1): 3-14.
|
|
[4]
|
李卫华. 民法典时代个人隐私信息公开豁免条款的困境及完善[J]. 行政法学研究, 2021, 130(6): 68-77.
|
|
[5]
|
张建文, 时诚. 《个人信息保护法》视野下隐私权与个人信息权益的相互关系——以私密信息的法律适用为中心[J]. 苏州大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 43(2): 46-57.
|
|
[6]
|
杨立新. 侵害个人信息权益损害赔偿的规则与适用——《个人信息保护法》第69条的关键词释评[J]. 上海政法学院学报(法治论丛), 2022, 37(1): 1-15.
|
|
[7]
|
杨立新. 私法保护个人信息存在的问题及对策[J]. 社会科学战线, 2021, 307(1): 193-202.
|
|
[8]
|
谢鸿飞. 个人信息泄露侵权责任构成中的“损害”——兼论风险社会中损害的观念化[J]. 国家检察官学院学报, 2021, 29(5): 21-37.
|
|
[9]
|
崔聪聪. 个人信息损害赔偿问题研究[J]. 北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版), 2014, 16(6): 35-42.
|
|
[10]
|
李昊. 个人信息侵权责任的规范构造[J]. 广东社会科学, 2022(1): 249-260.
|