“强弱关系”对大学生社交媒体自我呈现的影响
The Impact of “Strong and Weak Ties” on College Students’ Self-Presentation on Social Media
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2023.137375, PDF,   
作者: 李璐瑶：济南大学，教育与心理科学学院，山东 济南
关键词: 社交媒体；自我呈现；强弱关系；同一性探索；Social Media； Self-Presentation； Strong and Weak Ties； Identity Exploration
摘要: 社交媒体自我呈现是指个体为了建立或维护自身形象，通过社交媒体发布状态、分享心情等方式去有意或无意改变他人对自己看法的行为，是大学生在线自我同一性探索的主要形式。研究者发现大学生在使用不同的社交媒体时会呈现多个不同的自我，即使相同社交媒体所展示的自我也存在差异。其原因是面对不同的强弱关系，他们会产生不同的社交动机并且可以获得不同的社会支持与社交资源。未来研究可以采用追踪设计考察社交媒体自我呈现的发展趋势并探究强弱关系在不同发展阶段所起的作用或采用实验的方式验证强弱关系对大学生社交媒体自我呈现的影响。
Abstract: Self-presentation on social media refers to the behavior that individuals intentionally or unintentionally change others’ views on themselves by posting status and sharing mood on social media. The purpose of it is to establish or maintain their own image. It is a major form of online self-identity exploration for college students. The researchers found that college students would present multiple different selves when using different social media, even if the same social media will be used to present different selves. The reason is that in the face of different strong and weak ties, they will have different social motives and can obtain different social support and social resources. In future studies, tracking design can be adopted to investigate the development trend of social media self-presentation and explore the role of strong and weak ties in different stages of development, or using experiment to verify the impact of strong and weak ties on college students' social media self-presentation.
文章引用：李璐瑶 (2023). “强弱关系”对大学生社交媒体自我呈现的影响. 心理学进展, 13(7), 3027-3036. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2023.137375

参考文献

[1] 埃里克•埃里克森(1968). 同一性: 青少年与危机(孙名之 译, 1998). 杭州: 浙江教育出版社. https://book.douban.com/subject/1660682/
[2] 陈必忠(2020). 被动性社交网站使用与社会自我效能感: 有调节的中介模型. 心理技术与应用, 8(5), 291-297.
[3] 郭悦(2018). 社交网络自我呈现与自我概念清晰性的关系. 硕士学位论文, 徐州: 江苏师范大学.
[4] 李静(2020). 社交网站积极自我呈现对问题性社交网站使用的影响. 硕士学位论文, 开封: 河南大学.
[5] 李倩文(2022). 大学生显性自恋人格与社交网站自我呈现策略的关系研究. 科学咨询(科技•管理), (11), 69-71.
[6] 刘勤学, 孙佳宁, 余思(2019). 社交网站中的自我呈现与青少年网络利他行为: 网络社交效能和希望的作用. 心理发展与教育, 35(5), 530-539.
[7] 孙海燕(2022). 大学生社交网站自我呈现与自我同一性状态的关系. 硕士学位论文, 济南: 济南大学.
[8] 田人睿(2016). 微信使用动机、自我呈现策略对人格判断的影响. 硕士学位论文, 武汉: 华中师范大学.
[9] 王赛(2022). 中学生社会比较倾向对社交焦虑的影响: 负面评价恐惧与社交网站自我呈现策略的中介作用. 硕士学位论文, 海口: 海南师范大学.
[10] 王树青(2007). 大学生自我同一性形成的个体因素与家庭因素. 博士学位论文, 北京: 北京师范大学.
[11] 辛文娟, 赖涵, 陈晓丽(2016). 大学生社交网络中印象管理的动机和策略——以微信朋友圈为例. 情报杂志, 35(3), 190-194.
[12] 薛鹏达(2017). 社交媒体中的自我呈现及其影响因素研究. 硕士学位论文, 宁波: 宁波大学.
[13] 杨兰(2019). 高中生社交网站中自我呈现对主观幸福感的影响. 硕士学位论文, 西安: 陕西师范大学.
[14] 杨梦秋(2021). 大学生社交网站自我呈现对负面评价恐惧的影响: 网络社会支持的中介作用. 硕士学位论文, 南充: 西华师范大学.
[15] 赵思涵(2018). 大学生社交网络中的自我呈现、自我认同与生活满意度的关系. 硕士学位论文, 桂林: 广西师范大学.
[16] 甄稳波(2019). 大学生群体在社交媒体上的自我呈现研究. 硕士学位论文, 上海: 上海师范大学.
[17] 朱绘霖, 程乐华(2008). 补充、补偿——博主的两种自我表达方式及其呈现效果研究. 见 中国社会心理学会(编), 中国社会心理学会2008年全国学术大会论文摘要集(pp. 183).
[18] Baym, N. K., Zhang, Y. B., & Lin, M. C. (2004). Social Interactions across Media: Interpersonal Communication on the Internet, Telephone and Face-to-Face. New Media & Society, 6, 299-318.[CrossRef] 
[19] Blight, M. G., Jagiello, K., & Ruppel, E. K. (2015). “Same Stuff Different Day”: A Mixed-Method Study of Support seeKing on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 366-373.[CrossRef] 
[20] Bond, R. M., Fariss, C. J., Jones, J. J., Kramer, A. D. I., Marlow, C., Settle, J. E., & Fowler, J. H. (2012). A 61-Million-Person Experiment in Social Influence and Political Mobilization. Nature, 489, 295-298.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Broadbent, S. (2011). L’Intimité au travail: La vie privée et les communications personnelles dans l’entreprise. FYP Ditionsparis, (5), 191.
[22] Brown, J. J., & Reingen, P. H. (1987). Social Ties and Word-of-Mouth Referral Behavior. Consume, 14, 350-362.[CrossRef] 
[23] Burke, M., & Kraut, R. (2014). Growing Closer on Facebook: Changes in Tie Strength through Social Network Site Use. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 4187-4196). The Association for Computing Machinery.[CrossRef] 
[24] Burke, M., & Kraut, R. E. (2016). The Relationship between Facebook Use and Well-Being Depends on Communication Type and Tie Strength. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21, 265-281.[CrossRef] 
[25] Carpenter, D., Esterling, K., & Lazer, D. (2003). The Strength of Strong Ties: A Model of Contact-Making in Policy Networks with Evidence from US Health Politics. Rationality and Society, 15, 411-440.[CrossRef] 
[26] Carr, C., Haupt, A., & Krämer, N. (2016). Reconsidering the Relationship between Relational Closeness and Dimensions of Social Support: A Multinational Facebook Study. In The 66th Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association.
[27] Centola, D. (2011). An Experimental Study of Homophily in the Adoption of Health Behavior. Science, 334, 1269-1272.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Chen, W. (2013). Internet Use, Online Communication, and Ties in Americans’ Networks. Social Science Computer Review, 31, 404-423.[CrossRef] 
[29] Chen, W., Shen, C., & Huang, G. (2016). In Game We Trust? Coplay and Generalized Trust in and beyond a Chinese MMOG World. Information, Communication & Society, 19, 639-654.[CrossRef] 
[30] Chung, C. M., & Tsai, Q. (2009). The Effects of Regulatory Focus and Tie Strength on Word-of-Mouth Behavior. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 21, 329-341.[CrossRef] 
[31] Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120.[CrossRef] 
[32] Correa, T., Pavez, I., & Contreras, J. (2017). Beyond Access: A Relational and Resource-Based Model of Household Internet Adoption in Isolated Communities. Telecommunications Policy, 41, 757-768.[CrossRef] 
[33] Cutrona, C. E., & Russell, D. W. (1990). Type of Social Support and Specific Stress: Toward a Theory of Optimal Matching. In B. R. Sarason, I. G. Sarason, & G. R. Pierce (Eds.), Social Support: An International View (pp. 319-366). John Wiley & Sons.
[34] Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design. Management Science, 32, 554-571.[CrossRef] 
[35] De, P., Ferrara, E., Fiumara, G., & Provetti, A. (2014). On Facebook, Most Ties Are Weak. Communications of the ACM, 57, 78-84.[CrossRef] 
[36] Ellison, N. B., Steinfifield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The Benefits of Facebook “Friends:” Social Capital and College Students’ Use of Online Social Network Sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1143-1168.[CrossRef] 
[37] Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2011). Predicting and Changing Behavior: The Reasoned Action Approach. Psychology Press.[CrossRef] 
[38] Gee, L. K., Jones, J., & Burke, M. (2017). Social Networks and Labor Markets: How Strong Ties Relate to Job Finding on Facebook’s Social Network. Journal of Labor Economics, 35, 485-518.[CrossRef] 
[39] Granovetter, M. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.[CrossRef] 
[40] Guadagno, R. E., Okdie, B. M., & Kruse, S. A. (2012). Dating Deception: Gender Online Dating, and Exaggerated Self Presentation. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 642-647.[CrossRef] 
[41] Hampton, K. N., Sessions, L. F., & Her, E. J. (2011). Core Networks, Social Isolation, and New Media: How Internet and Mobile Phone Use Is Related to Network Size and Diversity. Information, Communication & Society, 14, 130-155.[CrossRef] 
[42] Jones, E. E., & Pittman, T. S. (1982). Toward a General Theory of Strategic Self-Presentation. Psychological Perspectives on the Self, 1, 231-262.
[43] Kenny, C. B. (1994). The Microenvironment of Attitude Change. The Journal of Politics, 56, 715-728.[CrossRef] 
[44] Kim, J., & Lee, J. E. R. (2011). The Facebook Paths to Happiness: Effects of the Number of Facebook Friends and Self-Presentation on Subjective Well-Being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14, 359-364.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[45] Krämer, N. C., Sauer, V., & Ellison, N. (2021). The Strength of Weak Ties Revisited: Further Evidence of the Role of Strong Ties in the Provision of Online Social Support. Social Media + Society, 7.[CrossRef] 
[46] Laurenceau, J.-P., Barrett, L. F., & Pietromonaco, P. R. (1998). Intimacy as an Interpersonal Process: The Importance of Self-Disclosure, Partner Disclosure, and Perceived Partner Responsiveness in Interpersonal Exchanges. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1238-1251.[CrossRef] 
[47] Lee, J. K., & Kim, E. (2017). Incidental Exposure to News: Predictors in the Social Media Setting and Effects on Information Gain Online. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 1008-1015.[CrossRef] 
[48] Lee, S.-J., Quigley, B. M., Nesler, M. S., Corbett, A. B., & Tedeschi, J. T. (1999). Development of a Self-Presentation Tactics Scale. Personality & Individual Differences, 26, 701-722.[CrossRef] 
[49] Lin, N. (1999). Building a Network Theory of Social Capital. Connections, 22, 28-51.
[50] Lin, R., & Utz, S. (2015). The Emotional Responses of Browsing Facebook: Happiness, Envy, and the Role of Tie Strength. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 29-38.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[51] Lu, L., Liu, J., & Yuan, C. (2022). Psychological Antecedents of COVID-19 Information Sharing within Strong-Tie and Weak-Tie Networks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1238-1251.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[52] Lutz, S., & Schneider, F. M. (2021). Is Receiving Dislikes in Social Media Still Better Than Being Ignored? The Effects of Ostracism and Rejection on Need Threat and Coping Responses Online. Media Psychology, 24, 741-765.[CrossRef] 
[53] Michikyan, M., Dennis, J., & Subrahmanyam, K. (2015). Can You Guess Who I Am? Real, Ideal, and False Self-Presentation on Facebook among Emerging Adults. Emerging Adulthood, 3, 55-64.[CrossRef] 
[54] Moffett, M. W. (2018). The Human Swarm. Basic Books.
[55] Oishi, S. (2014). Socioecological Psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 581-609.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[56] Panovich, K., Miller, R., & Karger, D. (2012). Tie Strength in Question and Answer on Social Network Sites. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 1057-1057). The Association for Computing Machinery.[CrossRef] 
[57] Parigi, P., & Henson, W. (2014). Social Isolation in America. Annual Review of Sociology, 40, 153-171.[CrossRef] 
[58] Rozzell, B., Piercy, C. W., Carr, C. T., King, S., Lane, B. L., Tornes, M. et al. (2014). Notification Pending: Online Social Support from Close and Nonclone Relational Ties via Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 38, 272-280.[CrossRef] 
[59] Schlenker, B. R., Forsyth, D. R., Leary, M. R., & Miller, R. S. (1980). Self-Presentational Analysis of the Effects of Incentives on Attitude Change Following Counterattitudinal Behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 553-577.[CrossRef] 
[60] Schouten, A. P., Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2007). Precursors and Underlying Processes of Adolescents’ Online Self-Disclosure: Developing and Testing an “Inter-net-Attribute-Perception” Model. Media Psychology, 10, 292-315.[CrossRef] 
[61] Stern, M. J. (2008). How Locality, Frequency of Communication and Internet Usage Affect Modes of Communication within Core Social Networks. Information, Communication & Society, 11, 591-616.[CrossRef] 
[62] Toma, C. L., & Hancock, J. T. (2013). Self-Affirmation Underlies Facebook Use. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 321-331.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[63] Ugander, J., Karrer, B., Backstrom, L., & Marlow, C. (2011). The Anatomy of the Facebook Social Graph. http://arxiv.org/abs/1111.4503
[64] Valenzuela, S., Correa, T., & de Zúñiga, H. G. (2018). Ties, Likes, and Tweets: Using Strong and Weak Ties to Explain Differences in Protest Participation across Facebook and Twitter Use. Political Communication, 35, 117-134.[CrossRef] 
[65] Van Ingen, E., & Wright, K. B. (2016). Predictors of Mobilizing Online Coping versus Offline Coping Resources after Negative Life Events. Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 431-439.[CrossRef] 
[66] Vitak, J., & Ellison, N. B. (2013). ‘There’s a Network Out There You Might as Well Tap’: Exploring the Benefits of and Barriers to Exchanging Informational and Support-Based Resources on Facebook. New Media & Society, 15, 243-259.[CrossRef] 
[67] Vriens, E., & van Ingen, E. (2018). Does the Rise of the Internet Bring Erosion of Strong Ties? Analyses of Social Media Use and Changes in Core Discussion Networks. New Media & Society, 20, 2432-2449.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[68] Walther, J. B., Van Der Heide, B., Kim, S.-Y., Westerman, D., & Tong, S. T. (2008). The Role of Friends’ Appearance and Behavior on Evaluations of Individuals on Facebook: Are We Known by the Company We Keep? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 28-49.[CrossRef] 
[69] Wellman, B., Quan-Haase, A., Boase, J. et al. (2003). The Social Affordances of the Internet for Networked Individualism. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 8, Article No. JCMC834.[CrossRef] 
[70] Wilcox, K., & Stephen, A. T. (2013). Are Close Friends the Enemy? Online Social Networks, Self-Esteem, and Self-Control. Journal of Consumer Research, 40, 90-103.[CrossRef] 
[71] Yang, C. C. (2014). It Makes Me Feel Good: A Longitudinal, Mixed-Methods Study on College Freshman’s Facebook Self-Presentation and Self-Development. Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Wisconsin-Madison.
[72] Yang, C.-C., & Bradford, B. B. (2016). Online Self-Presentation on Facebook and Self Development during the College Transition. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45, 402-416.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[73] Zhang, Y., Qiu, C., Zhang, J. (2022). A Research Based on Online Medical Platform: The Influence of Strong and Weak Ties Information on Patients’ Consultation Behavior. Healthcare, 10, Article No. 977.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[74] Zhao, S., Grasmuck, S., & Martin, J. (2008). Identity Construction on Facebook: Digital Empowerment in Anchored Relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1816-1836.[CrossRef]