法律行为要式问题研究
Research on the Issue of Legal Conduct Elements
摘要: 从概念上,法律行为的要式似乎很容易就能与法律行为的内容区分开来,但在法定要式规范和意定要式的识别上仍有需阐明的问题。《民法典》第165条“应当载明”的事项应为委托代理授权书内容的细化,而非形式要求;对于要式法律行为未以符合要式方式作出的部分内容,可以作为意思表示或法律行为的辅助解释因素,但其对法律行为本身的影响程度,有待提出可操作性标准。
Abstract: Conceptually, the elements of legal acts seem to be easily distinguishable from the contents of legal acts, but there are still issues to be clarified in the identification of statutory norms of elements and intended elements. Article 165 of the Civil Code “shall contain” matters should be a refinement of the content of the power of attorney for proxy, rather than a formal requirement; for the part of the content of the legal act that is not made in a manner consistent with the form of the form of the legal act, it can be used as an auxiliary interpretative factor of the intention or the legal act, but the degree of its impact on the legal act itself is yet to be put forward operational criteria.
文章引用:罗雨璐. 法律行为要式问题研究[J]. 争议解决, 2023, 9(4): 1812-1816. https://doi.org/10.12677/DS.2023.94244

参考文献

[1] 朱庆育. 民法总论[M]. 第2版. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2016.
[2] 朱广新. 书面形式与合同的成立[J]. 法学研究, 2019, 41(2): 59-76.
[3] 迪特尔•梅迪库斯. 德国民法总论[M]. 邵建东, 译. 北京: 法律出版社, 2013.
[4] 杨代雄. 法律行为论[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2021.
[5] 维尔纳•弗卢梅. 法律行为论[M]. 迟颖, 译. 北京: 法律出版社, 2013.
[6] 史尚宽. 民法总论[M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2016.
[7] 卡尔•拉伦茨. 德国民法通论: 下册[M]. 王晓晔, 等, 译. 北京: 法律出版社, 2013.
[8] 杨代雄. 合同的形式瑕疵及其补正——《合同法》第36条的解释与完善[J]. 上海财经大学学报, 2011(6): 47-48.