业绩期望落差、财务柔性与企业绿色投资
Performance Expectation Gap, Financial Flexibility, and Green Investment in Enterprises
摘要: 近年来,我国环境问题突出,随着双碳目标的提出,社会、企业、媒体、政府对于经济绿色发展日益关注,对于企业发展提出更多要求。绿色投资成为实现社会经济绿色转型和高质量发展的重要手段,但是目前中国企业绿色投资不足是突出问题。企业业绩会对其绿色投资行为选择具有一定影响,同时,绿色投资是一项兼具经济发展与社会责任的行为,因此作为衡量企业经济冗余的一项指标——财务柔性,可能会发挥一定中介作用。本文以2011~2021年上市公司为初始样本,实证检验业绩期望落差对企业绿色投资的影响以及财务柔性的中介作用。研究发现:业绩期望落差增大会缩减企业绿色投资规模,相关性在10%水平上显著;业绩期望落差增大会显著降低财务柔性储备,而财务柔性提高会显著扩大企业绿色投资规模,相关性都在5%水平上显著。因此业绩期望落差与企业绿色投资负相关,并且财务柔性在两者之间发挥部分中介效应。研究结论为提高企业绿色投资水平,实现经济绿色转型和政府政策制定提供一定建议。
Abstract: In recent years, environmental issues have become prominent in China. With the proposal of the dual carbon goal, society, enterprises, media, and government have increasingly focused on green economic development, and have put forward more requirements for enterprise development. Green investment has become an important means of achieving social and economic green transformation and high-quality development, but currently, the insufficient green investment of Chinese enterprises is a prominent problem. Enterprise performance will have a certain impact on their green investment behavior choices. At the same time, green investment is a behavior that combines economic development and social responsibility. Therefore, financial flexibility, as an indicator of economic redundancy for enterprises, may play a certain intermediary role. This paper takes listed companies in 2011~2021 as the initial sample, and empirically tests the impact of performance expectation gap on green investment and the intermediary role of financial flexibility. Research has found that an increase in performance expectation gap will reduce the scale of green investment in enterprises, with a significant correlation at the 10% level; an increase in performance expectation gap will significantly reduce financial flexibility reserves, while an increase in financial flexibility will significantly expand the scale of green investment for enterprises, with significant correlations at the 5% level. Therefore, the performance expectation gap is negatively related to the green investment of enterprises, and financial flexibility plays a part in the mesomeric effect between the two. The research conclusion provides certain suggestions for improving the level of green investment in enterprises, achieving green economic transformation, and formulating government policies.
文章引用:袁雨婷. 业绩期望落差、财务柔性与企业绿色投资[J]. 运筹与模糊学, 2023, 13(4): 2611-2619. https://doi.org/10.12677/ORF.2023.134260

参考文献

[1] 俞剑文. 业绩期望差距对企业环保投资规模的影响[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南京: 南京信息工程大学, 2020.
[2] 韦佳培. “双碳”目标下经济政策不确定性对绿色投资影响研究[J]. 财会通讯, 2023(7): 79-82.
[3] 许杨杨. 环保投资、技术创新与企业财务绩效——基于长江经济带上市公司的实证分析[J]. 中国注册会计师, 2023(4): 35-40.
[4] 连燕玲, 周兵, 贺小刚, 温丹玮. 经营期望、管理自主权与战略变革[J]. 经济研究, 2015(8): 31-44.
[5] Baum, J.A.C. and Dahlin, K.B. (2007) Aspiration Performance and Railroads’ Patterns of Learning from Train Wrecks and Crashes. Organization Science, 18, 368-385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Chen, W.R. and Miller, K.D. (2007) Situational and Institutional Determinants of Firms’ R&D Search Intensity. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 369-381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 韩静, 刘树园. 业绩期望顺差、财务柔性与企业绿色创新[J]. 会计之友, 2023(2): 115-123.
[8] 徐玉芳. 媒体关注与企业绿色投资: 声誉管理还是业绩管理[J]. 财会通讯, 2023(5): 48-52.
[9] David, D.L., Chen, W.H., Zhu, H. and Lan, H.L. (2019) How Does Inconsistent Negative Performance Feedback Affect the R&D Investments of Firms? A Study of Publicly Listed Firms. Journal of Business Research, 102, 151-162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 陈银飞, 邓雅慧. 企业数字化、业绩波动性与投资效率[J]. 财务研究, 2022, 43(1): 92-102.
[11] Cheng, H.W. and Feng, Y. (2023) Can Capital Markets Identify Heteroge-neous Environmental Investment Strategies of Firms? Evidence from China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 30, 58253-58275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] 李月娥, 李佩文, 董海伦. 产权性质、环境规制与企业环保投资[J]. 中国地质大学学报(社会科学版), 2018(6): 36-49.
[13] 桂荷发, 王晓艳. 融资约束、终极控制权结构与环保投资——基于沪深两市重污染行业上市公司的经验数据[J]. 南方金融, 2018(10): 15-24.
[14] Schal-tenbrand, B., Foerstl, K., Azadegan, A. and Lindeman, K. (2018) See What We Want to See? The Effects of Man-agerial Experience on Corporate Green Investments. Journal of Business Ethics, 150, 1129-1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] 王云, 李延喜, 马壮, 等. 媒体关注、环境规制与企业环保投资[J]. 南开管理评论, 2017, 20(6): 83-94.
[16] 吕明晗, 徐光华, 沈弋. 货币政策与企业环保投资行为——我国重污染行业上市公司的证据[J]. 经济管理, 2019(11): 55-71.
[17] 葛家澍, 占美松. 企业财务报告分析必须着重关注的几个财务信息: 流动性、财务适应性、预期现金净流入、盈利能力和市场风险[J]. 会计研究, 2008(5): 3-9.
[18] 孔德议, 许安心. 管理决断权、财务柔性与企业技术创新[J]. 证券市场导报, 2020(5): 56-63.
[19] Papagiannakis, G. and Lioukas, S. (2012) Values, Attitudes and Perceptions of Managers as Predictors of Corporate Environmental Responsiveness. Journal of Environmental Management, 100, 41-51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] 陈羽桃, 冯建. 企业绿色投资提升了企业环境绩效吗——基于效率视角的经验证据[J]. 会计研究, 2020(1): 179-192.
[21] 郑瑶, 孔东民. 地区环境治理压力、高管经历与企业环保投资: 一项基于《环境空气质量标准(2012)》的准自然实验[J]. 经济研究, 2019, 54(6): 183-198.
[22] 王菁, 程博, 孙元欣. 期望绩效反馈效果对企业研发和慈善捐赠行为的影响[J]. 管理世界, 2014(8): 115-133.