发达国家关于中小学教师评价体系改革的趋势、特征及启示
Trends, Characteristics and Insights of Developed Countries on the Reform of Teacher Evaluation Systems in Primary and Secondary Schools
DOI: 10.12677/AE.2023.138813, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 黄 蕊：云南师范大学教育学部，云南 昆明
关键词: 教育质量；核心素养；教育评价；教师评价；问责制；Educational Quality； Core Literacy； Educational Evaluation； Teacher Evaluation； Account Ability
摘要: 高质量的教师教学会带来学生学习结果的成功，因此对教师的教学质量评估是不可缺少的。本文旨在明确中小学教师评价的国际改革趋势，深入分析如美国田纳西州、澳大利亚的教师评估体系，汲取发达国家教师评价领域改革的优秀经验，对我国教师评价改革提出一些建议：专业问责模式塑造优质教师；赋权教师队伍以实现专业自主；丰富评价依据作出客观评价；课堂观察是评价的有效手段；完善教师表现的有效反馈机制。
Abstract: High-quality teacher teaching leads to successful student learning outcomes, and therefore assessment of teachers’ teaching quality is indispensable. The purpose of this paper is to identify the international reform trends of teacher evaluation in primary and secondary schools, analyze in depth the teacher evaluation systems such as those in Tennessee and Australia in the United States, draw on the excellent experiences of teacher evaluation field reform in developed countries, and make some suggestions for teacher evaluation reform in China: professional accountability model to shape quality teachers; empowering the teaching force to achieve professional autonomy; enriching the evaluation basis to make objective evaluations; classroom observation as an effective means of evaluation; and improving effective feedback mechanisms for teacher performance.
文章引用：黄蕊. 发达国家关于中小学教师评价体系改革的趋势、特征及启示[J]. 教育进展, 2023, 13(8): 5199-5206. https://doi.org/10.12677/AE.2023.138813

参考文献

[1] 联合国教科文组织. 全球教育监测报告[R/OL]. 64-83.
https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000259338_chi, 2017-08.
[2] Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (2018) Preparing Our Youth for an Inclusive and Sustainable World.
https://www.oecd.org/education/Global-competency-for-an-inclusive-world.pdf
[3] 胡军. 为全球基础教育课程改革导航——经合组织《教育2030学习指南》解析[J]. 小学教学(数学版), 2020(1): 71.
[4] Vosniadou, S., Lawson, M.J., Stephenson, H., Bodner, E. 教会学生如何学习: 为终身学习做好准备[Z]. 2021: 8-10.
[5] Organi-sation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. Policies to Support Teachers’ Continuing Professional Learn-ing—A Conceptual Framework and Mapping of OECD Data.
https://www.oecd.org/education/policies-to-support-teachers-continuing-professional-learning-247b7c4d-en.htm, 2020-20-22.
[6] Steinberg, M.P. and Donaldson, M.L. (2016) The New Educational Accountability: Understanding the Landscape of Teacher Evaluation in the Post-NCLB Era. Education Finance and Policy, 11, 340-359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[7] TN Department of Education (2012) Teacher Evaluation in Tennessee: A Report on Year 1 Implementation.
[8] Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (2018) Effective Teacher Policies: Insights from PISA.
https://www.oecd.org/education/effective-teacher-policies-9789264301603-en.htm
[9] Paufler, N.A. and Sloat, E.F. (2020) Using Standards to Evaluate Accountability Policy in Context: School Administrator and Teacher Perceptions of a Teacher Evaluation System. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 64, Article ID: 100806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[10] 史大胜, 王燕. 新西兰中小学教师评价制度改革: 动因、举措与价值取向[J]. 比较教育研究, 2021, 43(12): 18-27.
[11] 范连众, 赵娜, 孔凡哲. 澳大利亚教师评价素养发展项目的内容、特点及启示[J]. 现代教育管理, 2019(3): 69-74.
[12] Gore, J., Lloyd, A., Smith, M., Bowe, J., Ellis, H. and Lubans, D. (2017) Effects of Professional Development on the Quality of Teaching: Results from a Randomised Controlled Trial of Quality Teaching Rounds. Teaching and Teacher Education, 68, 99-113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[13] Hill, H.C. and Grossman, P. (2013) Learning from Teacher Obser-vations: Challenges and Opportunities Posed by New Teacher Evaluation Systems. Harvard Educational Review, 83, 371-384.[CrossRef] 
[14] 王强. 中美教育“围城”中教师问责制度比较研究[J]. 教育研究与实验, 2018(1): 42-48.
[15] Han, S.W. (2018) Who Expects to Become a Teacher? The Role of Educational Accountability Policies in International Perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 141-152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[16] Wallace, J.D. (2012) Teacher Evaluation: A Conversation among Education. Phi Delta Kappan, 3, 44-46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[17] Spruyt, B., Van Droogenbroeck, F., Van Den Borre, L., Emery, L., Keppens, G. and Siongers, J. (2021) Teachers’ Perceived Societal Appreciation: PISA Outcomes Predict Whether Teachers Feel Valued in Society. International Journal of Educational Research, 109, Article ID: 101833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[18] 高巍, 张亚林. 美国最新教师评价系统TEAM及其启示[J]. 教育研究与实验, 2017(1): 42-47.
[19] 王俊, 秦惠民. 全球教育治理视域中公立学校教师法律地位的重构[J]. 比较教育研究, 2022, 44(2): 25-32.
[20] 巴兹尔∙伯恩斯坦. 教育、符号控制与认同[M]. 王小凤, 王聪聪, 李京, 等, 译. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2016: 6-14, 50.
[21] Texas Education Agency (2016) Measures of Student Growth. http://tea.texas.gov/Texas_Educators/Educator_Evaluation_and_Support_System/Texas_Teacher_Evaluation_and_Support_System/
[22] 郝世文, 饶从满. 由问责走向合作: 美国中小学教师评价PAR模式研究[J]. 现代教育管理, 2019(10): 90-95.
[23] Paufler, N.A., King, K.M. and Zhu, P. (2020) Promoting Professional Growth in New Teacher Evaluation Systems: Practitioners’ Lived Experiences in Changing Policy Contexts. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 65, Article ID: 100873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[24] 时晨晨. 美国: 教师评价与学业成绩挂钩政策放宽[J]. 人民教育, 2019(24): 11.
[25] 吉鲁H.A. 教育与公共价值的危机——驳斥新自由主义对教师、学生和公立教育的攻击[M]. 吴万伟, 译. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2016: 5-9.
[26] Department of Education (2011) Built for Teach-ers: How the Blueprint for Reform Empowers Educators.
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED512379.pdf
[27] Liu, Y., Visone, J., Mongillo, M.B. and Lisi, P. (2019) What Matters to Teachers If Evaluation Is Meant to Help Them Improve? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 61, 41-54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[28] 康玥媛. 国外优秀教师特征及启示——基于国外优秀教师认定标准及评奖条件的研究[J]. 外国中小学教育, 2019(2): 59.
[29] 梁红梅, 李广平, 杨士镕. 美国田纳西州TEAM质性评价体系: 构成、实施与启示[J]. 外国教育研究, 2022, 49(8): 57-70.
[30] Jing, D. (2012) The Study on Educational Technology Abilities Evaluation Method. Physics Procedia, 24, 2111-2116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[31] 周文叶, 宋词. 教师表现性评价: 为使教学成为真正的专业——访美国斯坦福大学琳达∙达林∙哈蒙德教授[J]. 全球教育展望, 2018, 47(12): 3-13.
[32] Schildkamp, K., van der Kleij, F.M., Heitink, M.C., Kippers, W.B. and Veldkamp, B.P. (2020) Formative Assessment: A Systematic Review of Critical Teacher Prerequisites for Classroom Practice. International Journal of Educational Research, 103, Article ID: 101602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[33] 周文叶. 教师评价: 评什么和怎么评——访斯坦福大学李∙舒尔曼教授[J]. 全球教育展望, 2020, 49(12): 3-12.
[34] 岳伟, 陈俊源, 胡祥恩, 莫伦. 从TVAAS到Individual Growth: 美国田纳西州增值性教师评价发展新趋势[J]. 现代教育管理, 2019(9): 69-77.
[35] Stojiljkovic, S., Todorovic, J., Digic, G. and Doskovic, Z. (2014) Teachers’ Self-Concept and Empathy. Procedia—Social and Be-havioral Sciences, 116, 875-879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[36] Kaboolian, L. and Sutherland, P. (2018) Evaluation of Toledo Public School District Peer Assistance and Review Plan.
https://ahspeercoaching.wikispaces.com/file/view/ToledoPlanReport.pdf
[37] 刘翠航. 美国中小学教师同行评价40年: 变革与启示[J]. 教育科学研究, 2022(9): 91-96.
[38] Korthagen, F. (2017) Inconvenient Truths about Teacher Learning: Towards Professional Development 3.0. Teachers and Teaching, 23, 387-405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[39] Graham, L.J., White, S.L.J., Cologon, K. and Pianta, R.C. (2020) Do Teachers’ Years of Experience Make a Difference in the Quality of Teaching? Teaching and Teacher Educa-tion, 96, Article ID: 103190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[40] Ketonen, L. and Nieminen, J.H. (2023) Supporting Student Teach-ers’ Reflection through Assessment: The Case of Reflective Podcasts. Teaching and Teacher Education, 124, Article ID: 104039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[41] Gazdag, E., Nagy, K. and Szivák, J. (2019) “I Spy with My Little Eyes...” The Use of Video Stimulated Recall Methodology in Teacher Training—The Exploration of Aims, Goals and Methodological Characteristics of VSR Methodology through Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Educational Research, 95, 60-75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[42] 刘翠航. 批判和改进: 21世纪美国教师评价思想及实践的矫正[J]. 教师教育研究, 2021, 33(4): 115-121.
[43] Scherrer, J. (2011) Measuring Teaching Using Value-Added Modeling: The Imperfect Panacea. NASSP Bulletin, 95, 122-140.
[44] 韩玉梅, 严文蕃, 蒋丹. 探索增值评价的中国路向: 基于美国实践经验的批判性分析[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2023, 41(2): 63-80.
[45] Smith, W.C. and Ku-backa, K. (2017) The Emphasis of Student Test Scores in Teacher Appraisal Systems. Education Policy Analysis Ar-chives, 25, 1-26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[46] Silverman, M. (2017) Five Actions for Improving Classroom Observations. Association of Wisconsin School Administrators, Madison.
https://awsa.memberclicks.net/update-article--five-actions-for-improving-classroom-observations-district

为你推荐