英语六级与考研英语仔细阅读语篇难度对比——来自语料库的证据
A Comparison of Text Difficulty Levels of Intensive Reading Tasks between CET-6 and NETEM—Evidence from Corpus-Based Data
DOI: 10.12677/ML.2023.118464, PDF,   
作者: 周海涛:中国矿业大学外国语言文化学院,江苏 徐州
关键词: 仔细阅读语篇难度英语六级考研英语(一)考研英语(二)Intensive Reading Texts Text Difficulty CET6 NETEM-1 NETEM-2
摘要: 本文采用语料库方法对近年来大学英语六级、考研英语(一)、考研英语(二)的仔细阅读语篇难度进行了比较。研究收集了近年来三种考试的共计144篇仔细阅读文本,然后从词汇复杂度、句法复杂度、易读性和主题覆盖四个方面分别进行了分析,以考察三种考试仔细阅读语篇难度上是否有差异以及有怎样的差异。研究发现:总体而言,英语六级与考研英语(一)阅读语篇难度基本一致,且明显大于考研英语(二);英语六级阅读选材比考研英语更加广泛,对考生非语言知识储备要求更高。本研究对大学生英语学习和备考六级或考研英语具有参考意义。
Abstract: This paper reports on a corpus-based comparative study of the text difficulty levels of intensive reading tasks between College English Test Band 6 (CET-6) and two versions of National Entrance Test of English for MA/MS Candidates (NETEM-1 and NETEM-2) in recent years. A total of 144 texts of the three kinds of examinations in recent years were collected, and then analyzed from four aspects: lexical complexity, syntactic complexity, readability and thematic range to investigate whether and to what extent intensive reading texts of the three exams differ in text difficulty levels. It is found that there is a close resemblance between CET-6 and NETEM-1 on the whole in terms of text difficulty levels, and that both are significantly more difficult than NETEM-2. Besides, the reading texts of CET-6 cover a larger thematic range compared to that of both NETEM-1 and NETEM-2, which means that CET-6 requires more extra-linguistic knowledge of examinees than the other two do. This study can be of certain significance in that it might, hopefully, provide reference for college students in English learning and preparation for CET-6 or NETEM.
文章引用:周海涛. 英语六级与考研英语仔细阅读语篇难度对比——来自语料库的证据[J]. 现代语言学, 2023, 11(8): 3419-3429. https://doi.org/10.12677/ML.2023.118464

参考文献

[1] 全国大学英语四、六级考试委员会. 全国大学英语四、六级考试大纲[M]. 上海: 上海交通大学出版社, 2016.
[2] 教育部考试中心. 2022年全国硕士研究生入学统一考试英语(一)考试大纲(非英语专业) [M]. 北京: 高等教育出版, 2021.
[3] 教育部考试中心. 2022年全国硕士研究生入学统一考试英语(二)考试大纲(非英语专业) [M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2021.
[4] 詹先君. 外语测试阅读文本的效标关联效度验证研究——基于语料库的视角[J]. 外语测试与教学, 2015(3): 23-29.
[5] 高博, 赵海娟. 基于语料库的英语专业等级考试阅读语篇难度对比研究[J]. 考试研究, 2017(6): 76-81.
[6] 江进林, 韩宝成. 基于Coh-Metrix的大学英语六级与托福、雅思阅读语篇难度研究[J]. 中国外语, 2018, 15(3): 86-95.
[7] 陈灿. 雅思与全国硕士研究生英语入学考试阅读测试对比研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 武汉: 华中师范大学, 2012.
[8] 付霞辉. 托福与考研英语(一)阅读测试对比研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 武汉: 华中师范大学, 2015.
[9] 梁茂成, 李文中, 许家金. 语料库应用教程[M]. 北京: 外语教学与研究出版社, 2010.
[10] Ai, H. and Lu, X. (2013) A Corpus-Based Comparison of Syntactic Complexity in NNS and NS University Students’ Writing. In: Díaz-Negrillo, A., Ballier, N. and Thompson, P., Eds., Automatic Treatment and Analysis of Learner Corpus Data, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 249-264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Ortega, L. (2003) Syntactic Complexity Measures and Their Relationship to L2 Proficiency: A Research Synthesis of College-Level L2 Writing. Applied linguistics, 24, 492-518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Casal, J.E., Lu, X., Qiu, X., et al. (2021) Syntactic Complexity across Academic Research Article Part-Genres: A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 52, Article ID: 100996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] 陆小飞, 许琪. 二语句法复杂度分析器及其在二语写作研究中的应用[J]. 外语教学与研究, 2016, 48(3): 409-420.
[14] 陈练文, 李信, 赵超烨. 学术文本易读性和复杂度评价研究[J]. 数字图书馆论坛, 2018(5): 62-66.
[15] 王艳伟. 专业英语教材与测试阅读文本易读度比较研究[J]. 外语研究, 2021, 38(2): 70-75.