股骨颈基底部骨折髓内固定治疗研究进展
Research Progress of Intramedullary Fixation for Basal Femoral Neck Fractures
DOI: 10.12677/ACM.2023.1381825, PDF,   
作者: 覃 祺, 刘宇哲, 阿里木江·玉素甫, 冉 建*:新疆医科大学第六附属医院创伤骨科一科,新疆 乌鲁木齐;崔 莎:石柱县人民医院内科,重庆
关键词: 股骨颈骨折股骨颈基底部骨折髓内钉疗效综述Femoral Neck Fracture Fracture of the Base of the Femoral Neck Intramedullary Nail Efficacy Re-view
摘要: 股骨颈基底部骨折在临床中相对罕见且易误诊,目前该类骨折的定义虽有争论但逐渐趋于一致,这使其诊断和治疗的讨论有了共同基础。股骨颈基底解剖位置及生物力学特殊,该部位骨折具有股骨颈骨折的旋转不稳定与转子间骨折的内翻不稳定双重特点,从而导致治疗困难。目前关于股骨颈基底部骨折内固定的选择仍未达统一,虽然有学者质疑髓内钉固定在治疗股骨颈基底部骨折的作用,但近年来髓内钉固定已经取得了良好的治疗效果。本文对近年股骨颈基底部骨折的髓内固定治疗的研究进展进行综述。
Abstract: Femoral neck base fracture is relatively rare and easy to be misdiagnosed in the clinic. Although there are debates on the definition of this kind of fracture, it is gradually converging, which makes the discussion of diagnosis and treatment have a common basis. The basal anatomic location and biomechanics of the femoral neck are special, and the fracture in this part is characterized by both rotational instability of the femoral neck fracture and varus instability of the intertrochanteric fracture, which makes treatment difficult. At present, the selection of internal fixation for femoral neck base fracture is still not unified. Although some scholars have questioned the effect of in-tramedullary nail fixation in the treatment of femoral neck base fracture, intramedullary nail fixa-tion has achieved good therapeutic effect in recent years. This article reviews the recent research progress of intramedullary fixation in the treatment of femoral neck base fracture.
文章引用:覃祺, 刘宇哲, 阿里木江·玉素甫, 崔莎, 冉建. 股骨颈基底部骨折髓内固定治疗研究进展[J]. 临床医学进展, 2023, 13(8): 13031-13037. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2023.1381825

参考文献

[1] Xu, J.L., Liang, Z.R., Xiong, B.L., et al. (2019) Risk Factors Associated with Osteonecrosis of Femoral Head after In-ternal Fixation of Femoral Neck Fracture: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 20, Article No. 632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] 林健, 王建东, 王秋根. 股骨颈基底部骨折诊断与治疗研究进展[J]. 国际骨科学杂志, 2022, 43(1): 4-7.
[3] Lee, Y.K., Yoon, B.H., Hwang, J.S., et al. (2018) Risk Factors of Fixation Failure in Basicervical Femoral Neck Fracture: Which Device Is Optimal for Fixation? Injury, 49, 691-696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Dekhne, M.S., Thomas, H.M., Haider, T., et al. (2021) Treatment and Outcomes of Basicervical Femoral Neck Fractures: A Systematic Review. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Chen, C.Y., Chiu, F.Y., Chen, C.M., et al. (2008) Surgical Treatment of Basicervical Fractures of Femur—A Prospective Evaluation of 269 Patients. The Journal of Trauma, 64, 427-429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Guo, J., Dong, W., Jin, L., et al. (2019) Treatment of Basicervical Femoral Neck Fractures with Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation. Journal of International Medical Re-search, 47, 4333-4343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Khurana, B., Mandell, J.C., Rocha, T.C., et al. (2018) Internal Rotation Traction Radiograph Improves Proximal Femoral Fracture Classification Accuracy and Agreement. AJR American Journal of Roentgenology, 211, 409-415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Chapman, T., Zmistowski, B., Krieg, J., et al. (2018) Helical Blade versus Screw Fixation in the Treatment of Hip Fractures with Cephalomedullary Devices: Incidence of Failure and Atyp-ical “Medial Cutout”. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 32, 397-402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Watson, S.T., Schaller, T.M., Stephanie, L.T., et al. (2016) Outcomes of Low-Energy Basicervical Proximal Femoral Fractures Treated with Cephalomedullary Fixation. The Jour-nal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 98, 1097-1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Imren, Y., Gurkan, V., Bilsel, K., et al. (2015) Biomechanical Com-parison of Dynamic Hip Screw, Proximal Femoral Nail, Cannulated Screw, and Monoaxial External Fixation in the Treatment of Basicervical Femoral Neck Fractures. Acta Chirurgiae Orthopaedicae et Traumatologiae Cechoslovaca, 82, 140-144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] 吕红伟, 李树锋, 陈猛, 等. Gamma钉治疗股骨粗隆间骨折[J]. 生物骨科材料与临床研究, 2008, 5(2): 1.
[12] Kweon, S.H., Lee, S.H., Kook, S.H., et al. (2017) Outcomes of Cepha-lomedullary Nailing in Basicervical Fracture. Hip & Pelvis, 29, 270-276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Yoo, J., Kim, S., Choi, J., et al. (2019) Gamma 3 U-Blade Lag Screws in Patients with Trochanteric Femur Fractures: Are Rotation Control Lag Screws Better than Others? Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 14, Article No. 440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Wang, W.Y., Liu, L., Wang, G.L., et al. (2010) Ipsilateral Basicervical Femoral Neck and Shaft Fractures Treated with Long Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation or Various Plate Combinations: Comparative Study. Journal of Orthopaedic Science, 15, 323-330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Hu, S.J., Yu, G.R. and Zhang, S.M. (2013) Surgical Treatment of Basicervical Intertrochanteric Fractures of the Proximal Femur with Cephalomeduallary Hip Nails. Ortho-paedic Surgery, 5, 124-129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Tasyıkan, L., Ugutmen, E., Sanel, S., et al. (2015) Short-Term Results of Surgical Treatment with Cephalomedullary Nails for Basicervical Proximal Femoral Frac-tures. Acta Orthopaedica Belgica, 81, 427-434.
[17] 高榅青. 不同固定方式对股骨颈基底部骨折的影响[J]. 中外医学研究, 2022, 20(13): 112-115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Kwak, D.K., Kim, W.H., Lee, S.J., et al. (2018) Biome-chanical Comparison of Three Different Intramedullary Nails for Fixation of Unstable Basicervical Intertrochanteric Fractures of the Proximal Femur: Experimental Studies. BioMed Research International, 2018, Article ID: 7618079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Wang, Q., Gu, X.H., Li, X., et al. (2019) Management of Low-Energy Basicervical Proximal Femoral Fractures by Proximal Femoral Nail Anti-Rotation. Orthopaedic Surgery, 11, 1173-1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] 张力鹏. InterTan髓内钉治疗老年骨质疏松患者股骨转子间骨折的临床研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 西安: 第四军医大学, 2016.
[21] 张兴胜, 桑庆华, 张晓光, 等. 内侧皮质支撑在InterTan内固定治疗股骨转子间骨折中的应用研究[J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2023, 29(6): 487-490+508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] 冯卫, 余斌, 郝廷, 等. 三种股骨近端髓内固定系统与国人股骨近端的形态学匹配性研究[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2011, 13(11): 1029-1033.
[23] Knobe, M., Gradl, G., Buecking, B., et al. (2015) Locked Minimally Invasive Plating versus Fourth Generation Nailing in the Treatment of AO/OTA 31A2.2 Fractures: A Biomechanical Comparison of PCCP® and Intertan Nail®. Injury, 46, 1475-1482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] 曾展鹏, 黄学员, 黄枫, 等. Intertan与PFNA髓内钉治疗老年股骨颈基底部骨折的比较分析[J]. 中国中医骨伤科杂志, 2015, 23(4): 45-46.
[25] 房康, 朱晓光, 吴蔚, 等. 不同内固定方式治疗老年股骨转子间骨折疗效比较[J]. 临床军医杂志, 2019, 47(7): 661-664.
[26] Karapinar, L., Kumbaraci, M., Kaya, A., et al. (2012) Proximal Femoral Nail Anti-Rotation (PFNA) to Treat Peritrochanteric Fractures in Elderly Patients. European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 22, 237-243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[27] 刘涛, 牛国旗, 王志焘, 等. PFNA与InterTan髓内钉治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效比较[J]. 齐齐哈尔医学院学报, 2020, 41(5): 573-576.
[28] 李祖涛, 周文正, 缪晓刚, 等. InterTan、PFNA、Gamma 3型髓内钉内固定治疗老年不稳定股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效比较[J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志, 2018, 33(10): 1017-1020.
[29] 张英泽, 王海程, 陈伟, 等. 三角支撑固定: 股骨转子间骨折手术的革新[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2021, 23(6): 461-466.
[30] 朱燕宾, 陈伟, 叶丹丹, 等. 股骨近端N三角理论及股骨近端仿生髓内钉(PFNB)的设计理念[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2021, 7(5): 257-259.
[31] Zhao, H., Deng, X., Liu, W., et al. (2023) Proximal Femoral Bionic Nail (PFBN)—An Innovative Surgical Method for Unstable Femoral In-tertrochanteric Fractures. International Orthopaedics, 47, 1089-1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[32] 林栋, 陈长青, 王升, 等. 股骨近端仿生髓内钉与股骨近端防旋髓内钉固定治疗老年股骨转子间骨折的早期疗效比较[J]. 中华创伤杂志, 2022, 38(11): 1027-1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[33] 李祖涛, 殷剑, 肖伟, 等. 股骨近端仿生髓内钉与股骨近端防旋髓内钉固定治疗老年股骨转子间骨折的近期疗效比较. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2022, 24(6): 528-532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef