多模态超声成像评分法在BI-RADS 4类乳腺肿块中的应用价值
Application Value of Multimodal Ultrasound Imaging Scoring Method in BI-RADS 4 Breast Masses
DOI: 10.12677/ACM.2023.1381840, PDF,   
作者: 刘晚玲, 毕 玉, 詹韵韵, 彭 梅*:安徽医科大学第二附属医院超声医学科,安徽 合肥
关键词: 多模态超声定量血管指数弹性应变比Multimodal Ultrasound Quantification Vascular Index Elastography Strain Ratio
摘要: 目的:探讨多模态超声成像评分法在BI-RADS 4类肿块中的应用价值。方法:选取189个灰阶超声(US)诊断为BI-RADS 4类乳腺肿块,病理结果均由手术方式获得。所有肿块均经微血管血流成像、弹性超声获得血管指数(VI)、弹性应变比(SR)定量参数。以病理结果为金标准构建相应ROC曲线,获取截断值。参考相关文献对灰阶超声(US)、多模态超声(US + VI + SR)进行评分构建ROC曲线并比较诊断效能。结果:灰阶超声及多模态超声的灵敏性、特异性、准确性及AUC分别为:93.7%、79.8%、85.7%、0.868;88.7%、89.9%、89.4%、0.935。相较于灰阶超声,多模态超声AUC、特异性明显上升,具有统计学差异(P < 0.05),准确性上升、灵敏性下降,不具有统计学差异(P > 0.05)。结论:多模态超声成像评分法可为鉴别4类乳腺肿块良恶性提供一种简单有效的定量诊断方法,进一步提高超声诊断效能,可在一定程度上减少不必要活检。
Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the application value of multimodal ultrasound imaging scoring method in BI-RADS4 masses. Methods: A total of 189 breast masses diagnosed as BI-RADS category 4 by gray-scale ultrasound (US) were selected, and pathological findings were obtained by surgical ap-proach. All masses were imaged by micro-vascular flow imaging and elastic ultrasound to obtain quantitative parameters of vascular index (VI) and elastography strain ratio (SR). The pathological findings were used as the gold standard to construct the corresponding ROC curves and obtain the cut-off values. The ROC curves were constructed by scoring gray-scale ultrasound (US) and multi-modal ultrasound (US + VI + SR) with reference to relevant literature and comparing the diagnostic efficacy. Results: The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and AUC of gray-scale ultrasound and multi-modal ultrasound were 93.7%, 79.8%, 85.7%, 0.868 and 88.7%, 89.9%, 89.4%, 0.935, respectively. Compared with gray-scale ultrasound, the AUC and specificity of multimodal ultrasound increased significantly (P < 0.05), but the accuracy increased and sensitivity decreased, there was no statisti-cal difference (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Multimodal ultrasound imaging scoring method can provide a simple and effective quantitative diagnosis method for distinguishing benign and malignant breast mass, further improve the diagnostic efficiency of ultrasound and reduce unnecessary biopsy to a certain extent.
文章引用:刘晚玲, 毕玉, 詹韵韵, 彭梅. 多模态超声成像评分法在BI-RADS 4类乳腺肿块中的应用价值[J]. 临床医学进展, 2023, 13(8): 13171-13178. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2023.1381840

参考文献

[1] Sung, H., Ferlay, J., Siegel, R.L., et al. (2021) Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 71, 209-249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Chen, X., Wei, X., Zhao, S., et al. (2021) Characterization of Placental Mi-crovascular Architecture by MV-Flow Imaging in Normal and Fetal Growth-Restricted Pregnancies. Journal of Ultra-sound in Medicine, 40, 1533-1542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] 中国抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会. 中国抗癌协会乳腺癌诊治指南与规范(2021年版) [J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2021, 31(10): 954-1040.
[4] 邢肖肖, 钱丰, 张琪, 等. 乳腺病灶周围2 mm组织弹性参数对BI-RADS 4类肿块的鉴别诊断价值[J]. 肿瘤影像学, 2022, 31(5): 536-542.
[5] 贺红霞, 刘晓芳, 陈耀东, 等. 剪切波弹性成像异质性分析校正乳腺病灶BI-RADS分类的价值[J]. 临床超声医学杂志, 2021, 23(11): 811-815.
[6] Lee, E.J. and Chang, Y.-W. (2022) Prospective Analysis of Breast Masses Using the Combined Score for Quantitative Ultrasonography Parameters. Scientific Reports, 12, Article No. 16205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] 何艳, 王知力, 李亚帅, 张孟珂. 多模态超声在乳腺BI-RADS 4类结节良恶性鉴别诊断中的应用价值[J]. 解放军医学院学报, 2018, 39(10): 838-843.
[8] 沈伟强, 周超, 朱正. 探讨多模态超声在乳腺BI-RADS 4类结节良恶性鉴别诊断中的应用价值[J]. 影像研究与医学应用, 2020, 4(21): 162-164.
[9] 肖美华, 裴书芳, 丛淑珍, 等. 复合多模态超声技术成像鉴别结节性ACR BI-RADS 4类乳腺病变的应用价值[J]. 循证医学, 2021, 21(4): 232-239.
[10] Park, A.Y., Kwon, M., Woo, O.H., et al. (2019) A Prospective Study on the Value of Ultrasound Microflow Assessment to Distinguish Malignant from Benign Solid Breast Masses: Association between Ultrasound Parameters and Histologic Microvessel Densities. Korean Journal of Radiology, 20, 759-772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Lee, E.J. and Chang, Y.-W. (2020) Combina-tion of Quantitative Parameters of Shear Wave Elastography and Superb Microvascular Imaging to Evaluate Breast Masses. Korean Journal of Radiology, 21, 1045-1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Lee, E.J., Chang, Y.-W., Oh, E., Hwang, J., Kim, H.-J. and Hong, S.-S. (2021) Reproducibility and Diagnostic Performance of the Vascular Index of Superb Microvascular Imaging in Re-al-Time Breast Ultrasonography for Evaluating Breast Masses. Ultrasonography, 40, 398-406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Giuffrida, A., Peixoto, A.B. and Araujo Jr., E. (2021) MV-Flow and Lu-miFlow: New Doppler Tools for Evaluating the Microvasculature of the Fetal Head. Radiologia Brasileira, 54, 348-349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Zhang, X.Y., Zhang, L., Li, N., et al. (2019) Vascular Index Measured by Smart 3-D Superb Microvascular Imaging Can Help to Differentiate Malignant and Benign Breast Lesion. Cancer Management and Research, 11, 5481-5487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Chae, E.Y., Yoon, G.Y., Cha, J.H., et al. (2021) Added Value of the Vascular Index on Superb Microvascular Imaging for the Evaluation of Breast Masses. Journal of Ultrasound in Medi-cine, 40, 715-723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] 李涛, 何广敏, 刘观成, 罗春月. 剪切波弹性成像鉴别乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS) 4类乳腺肿块[J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2021, 37(1): 67-70.
[17] 张一丹, 孔文韬, 王颖, 吴敏. 剪切波弹性成像鉴别诊断乳腺BI-RADS 4A类病灶良恶性的价值[J]. 临床超声医学杂志, 2021, 23(4): 271-275.
[18] 张耀辉, 郑章增, 高星. 超声BI-RADS分类联合SWE技术鉴别诊断乳腺肿块良恶性的价值研究[J]. 实用癌症杂志, 2022, 37(10): 1689-1691, 1700.
[19] 刘健, 武敬平, 王宁, 等. 弹性应变率比值联合乳腺超声影像报告和数据系统诊断乳腺结节的应用价值[J]. 中国医学科学院学报, 2021, 43(1): 63-68.
[20] 柳舜兰, 吕国荣, 徐晚虹, 等. 联合彩色多普勒、弹性成像的BI-RADS评价体系的构建及其价值[J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志, 2018, 29(3): 165-167.