公众对警察行为的道德评价:能动性和感受性的心智知觉解释
Public Moral Evaluation on Police Behavior: Mind Perception Explanation of the Initiative and Sensitivity
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2023.138423, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 傅 翌, 云 祥, 于天齐, 徐皖龙, 廖浩森:南京森林警察学院管理学院,江苏 南京
关键词: 警察道德行为感受性能动性心智知觉理论Police Moral Behavior Sensitivity Initiative Theory of Mental Perception
摘要: 文章探讨了人们对不同对象行为的道德评价差异以及与其心智知觉之间的关系。结果显示,相同的道德行为中,人们对警察的道德赞赏程度显著低于普通人,而对于不道德行为,人们对警察的谴责程度显著高于普通人。此外,人们认为警察在感受性维度上较普通人更弱,但在能动性维度上更优秀。进一步的分析发现,心智知觉与道德行为评价之间存在显著关系,当被试对目标对象的感受性和能动性知觉较高时,对其道德行为的评价更为积极。然而,对不道德行为的评价仅在目标对象为警察时受心智知觉影响。本研究揭示了人们在道德评价和心智知觉方面的认知差异,对于理解人们对不同目标对象行为的态度具有重要意义。
Abstract: This study examines the evaluative differences in moral and immoral behavior towards different objects and their relationship with mind perception. The results indicate that, for the same moral behavior, individuals show significantly lower moral appreciation towards police officers compared to ordinary individuals. Conversely, for immoral behavior, individuals express significantly higher condemnation towards police officers than towards ordinary individuals. Furthermore, police offic-ers are perceived as weaker in sensitivity dimension but superior in initiative dimension compared to ordinary individuals. Further analyses reveal a significant association between mind perception and moral behavior evaluation, whereby participants with higher levels of sensitivity and initiative perception towards the target objects tend to exhibit more positive evaluations of their moral be-havior. However, the evaluation of immoral behavior is only influenced by mind perception when the target object is a police officer. In summary, this study sheds light on the cognitive differences in moral evaluation and mind perception, providing important insights into understanding attitudes towards behaviors exhibited by different target objects.
文章引用:傅翌, 云祥, 于天齐, 徐皖龙, 廖浩森 (2023). 公众对警察行为的道德评价:能动性和感受性的心智知觉解释. 心理学进展, 13(8), 3370-3376. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2023.138423

参考文献

[1] 徐科朋, 许燕, 焦丽颖, 张姝玥, 徐晓丹, 薛宏, 等(2020). 行为者社会阶层特征对道德判断的影响. 科学通报, 65(19), 1946-1955.
[2] 张威威, 汪小燕(2021). 基于心智知觉理论的医生形象. 心理学进展, 11(6), 1395-1401.[CrossRef
[3] Goranson, A., Sheeran, P., Katz, J., & Gray, K. (2020). Doctors Are Seen as Godlike: Moral Typecasting in Medicine. Social Science & Medicine, 258, Article ID: 113008.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Gray, H. M., Gray, K., & Wegner, D. M. (2007). Dimensions of Mind Perception. Science, 315, 619.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Gray, K., & Wegner, D. M. (2009). Moral Typecasting: Divergent Per-ceptions of Moral Agents and Moral Patients. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 505-520.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Gray, K., Waytz, A., & Young, L. (2012). The Moral Dyad: A Fundamental Template Unifying Moral Judgment. Psychological Inquiry, 23, 206-215.[CrossRef
[7] Schein, C., & Gray, K. (2018). The Theory of Dyadic Morality: Reinventing Moral Judgment by Redefining Harm. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 22, 32-70.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Shepherd, S., Kay, A. C., & Gray, K. (2019). Military Veterans Are Morally Typecast as Agentic but Unfeeling: Implications for Veteran Employment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 153, 75-88.[CrossRef
[9] Yam, K. C., Fehr, R., Burch, T. C., Zhang, Y., & Gray, K. (2019). Would I Really Make a Difference? Moral Typecasting Theory and Its Implications for Helping Ethical Leaders. Journal of Business Ethics, 160, 675-692.[CrossRef
[10] Young, L., Koenigs, M., Kruepke, M., & Newman, J. P. (2012). Psychopathy Increases Perceived Moral Permissibility of Accidents. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121, 659-667.[CrossRef] [PubMed]