宫颈上皮内病变患者锥切术后切缘阳性的相关研究
Study on Positive Margin after Conical Resection in Patients with Cervical Intraepithelial Lesions
DOI: 10.12677/ACM.2023.1381869, PDF,   
作者: 王 惠:内蒙古医科大学研究生学院,内蒙古 呼和浩特;杨晓玲*:内蒙古自治区妇幼保健院妇科,内蒙古 呼和浩特
关键词: 宫颈上皮内病变宫颈锥切切缘阳性Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN) Cold-Knife Conization (CKC) Positive Margin
摘要: 宫颈上皮内病变(CIN)是宫颈癌的癌前病变,目前治疗CIN的方法包括宫颈冷刀锥切术(cold-knife conization, CKC)、宫颈环形电切术(loop electrosurgical excision procedure, LEEP)和冷冻治疗。CKC是目前治疗高级别鳞状上皮内病变的首选方式。由于宫颈锥切术并不是全部将宫颈予以切除,锥切术后难免会出现切缘阳性的可能,因此锥切术后切缘阳性问题成为临床医生关注的焦点。对于初次锥切术后病理证实切缘阳性的宫颈高级别鳞状上皮内病变患者的进一步处理是采取积极措施还是保守治疗,严密随访,目前仍没有统一的标准。因此,宫颈锥切的切缘阳性问题越来越受到更多医生及患者的关注。
Abstract: Cervical intraepithelial lesion (CIN) is cervical precancerous lesions of cerviacal cancer, the current treatment methods of CIN include cervical cold knife cut method (cold-knife conization, CKC), cervi-cal loop electricity cut method (loop electrosurgical excision procedure, LEEP) and cryotherapy. CKC is currently the preferred treatment for high-level squamous intraepithelial lesions. Because not the whole cervix is completely removed in conical excision, it is inevitable that there will be a posi-tive margin after conical excision, so the problem of positive margin after conical excision has be-come the focus of clinicians. At present, there is still no unified standard for the further manage-ment of high-level squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix with positive incisal margin con-firmed by pathology after the initial coning operation, whether to adopt active measures or con-servative treatment or strict follow-up. Therefore, the positive margin of cervical conectomy has at-tracted more and more attention from more doctors and patients.
文章引用:王惠, 杨晓玲. 宫颈上皮内病变患者锥切术后切缘阳性的相关研究[J]. 临床医学进展, 2023, 13(8): 13375-13380. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2023.1381869

参考文献

[1] Li, X., Liu, M.H., Ji, Y.R. and Qu, P.P. (2021) The Effectiveness of Cold-Knife Conization (CKC) for Post-Menopausal Women with Cervical High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion: A Retrospective Study. BMC Surgery, 21, Article No. 241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] 吴玉芳. 高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变环形电切术后持续病变或复发影响因素分析[J]. 中外医学研究, 2020, 18(34): 168-170.
[3] 赵超, 毕蕙, 赵昀, 等. 子宫颈高级别上皮内病变管理的中国专家共识[J]. 中国妇产科临床杂志, 2022, 23(2): 220-224.
[4] Santesso, N., et al. (2016) World Health Organization Guidelines for Treatment of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia 2-3 and Screen-and-Treat Strategies to Prevent Cervical Cancer. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 132, 252-258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Bogani, G. and Di Donato, V. (2020) Recurrence Rate after Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure (LEEP) and Laser Conization: A 5-Year Follow-Up Study. Gynecologic Oncology, 159, 636-641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] 赵超, 刘军, 李明珠. 子宫颈锥形切除术操作规范[J]. 中国妇产科临床杂志, 2021, 22(2): 218-219.
[7] Jiang, Y.M., Chen, C.X. and Li, L. (2016) Meta-Analysis of Cold-Knife Conization versus Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia. OncoTargets and Therapy, 9, 3907-3915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] 蔡明翠, 张荣. 宫颈上皮内瘤变术后复发及残留的危险因素分析[J]. 现代实用医学, 2018, 30(9): 1204-1206.
[9] 李柱南. 宫颈上皮内瘤变宫颈环形电切术后2098例标本切缘阳性的临床病理分析[J]. 实用妇产科杂志, 2012, 28(2): 150-152.
[10] 吕丹阳, 罗洁, 兰义兵. 宫颈环形电切术切缘阳性与高级别鳞状上皮内病变及以上病变残留风险的关系[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2022, 37(18): 3480-3483.
[11] Przybylski, M., et al. (2022) Remission of HPV Infection after LEEP-Conization—A Retrospective Study. Ginekologia Polska, 93, 99-104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Wright, T.C. and Denny, L. (2000) HPV DNA Testing of Self-Collected Vaginal Samples Compared with Cytologic Screening to Detect Cervical Cancer. JAMA, 283, 81-86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Coleman, M.P.N. (2007) Integration of High-Risk Human Papillomavirus: A Key Event in Cervical Carcinogenesis? The Journal of Pathology, 212, 356-367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Rabasa, J. and Bradbury, M. (2020) Evaluation of the Intraoperative Human Papillomavirus Test as a Marker of Early Cure at 12 Months after Electrosurgical Excision Procedure in Women with Cervical High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion: A Prospective Cohort Study. BJOG, 127, 99-105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] 闫彩平, 黎华文, 邓鹏飞. 高级别宫颈鳞状上皮内病变患者宫颈锥切术后切缘阳性的影响因素分析[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2021, 36(14): 3305-3308.
[16] 黄芳, 陈誉, 柯嘉敏. 宫颈HSIL患者LEEP刀宫颈锥切术后切缘阳性的相关因素[J]. 深圳中西医结合杂志, 2021, 31(22): 26-28.
[17] Gameiro, C.M., Romao, F. and Castelo-Branco, C. (2010) Menopause and Aging: Changes in the Immune System—A Review. Maturitas, 67, 316-320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Khansari, N., Shakiba, Y. and Mahmoudi, M. (2009) Chronic Inflammation and Oxidative Stress as a Major Cause of Age-Related Diseases and Cancer. Recent Patents on Inflammation & Allergy Drug Discovery, 3, 73-80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] 郭红, 吴利英. 高级别鳞状上皮内病变宫颈锥切术后切缘阳性患者病变残留危险因素分析[J]. 陕西医学杂志, 2022, 51(6): 749-752+763.
[20] Wira, C.R., Fahey, J.V., et al. (2014) Regulation of Mucosal Immunity in the Female Reproductive Tract: The Role of Sex Hormones in Immune Pro-tection against Sexually Transmitted Pathogens. American Journal of Reproductive Immunology, 72, 236-258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Abdi, F. (2016) Effects of Hormone Replacement Therapy on Immunological Factors in the Postmenopausal Period. Climacteric, 19, 234-239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Ikeda, M. (2021) Association of Menopause, Aging and Treatment Procedures with Positive Margins after Therapeutic Cervical Conization for CIN 3: A Retrospective Study of 8,856 Patients by the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Journal of Gynecologic Oncology, 32, e68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] 徐海洋, 梁华茂. 绝经后女性宫颈高级别鳞状上皮内病变诊治特点及手术方式探讨[J]. 现代妇产科进展, 2020, 29(4): 313-316.
[24] 陈香, 董燕, 张丽. 宫颈高级别鳞状上皮内病变锥切术后高危型HPV持续感染的研究进展[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2021, 37(16): 2039-2043.
[25] Bilibio, J.P., Monego, H.I., Binda, M.L.A. and dos Reis, R. (2019) Menopausal Status Is Associated with a High Risk for Residual Disease after Cervical Conization with Positive Margins. PLOS ONE, 14, e0217562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Ge, Y. (2021) Predictors of Recurrence in Patients with High-Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia after Cervical Conization. Medicine (Baltimore), 100, e26359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[27] Wright, T.C. and Thomas Cox, J. (2001) Consensus Guide-lines for the Management of Women with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecol-ogy, 189, 295-304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Chen, J.Y., et al. (2018) The Risk Factors of Re-sidual Lesions and Recurrence of the High-Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Lesions (HSIL) Patients with Positive-Margin after Conization. Medicine (Baltimore), 97, e12792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[29] 陈超. 高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变宫颈锥切术后病理升级的多因素分析及临床处理措施[J]. 中国当代医药, 2019, 26(22): 104-106.
[30] Santesso, N., Mustafa, R.A., Wiercioch, W. and Kehar, R. (2016) Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Benefits and Harms of Cryotherapy, LEEP, and Cold Knife Conization to Treat Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 132, 266-271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] 刘慧慧. 高级别宫颈鳞状上皮内病变患者宫颈锥切术后复发的预测因素分析[J]. 航空航天医学杂志, 2022, 33(2): 138-140.
[32] 彭晶晶, 尤志学. 宫颈上皮内瘤变锥切切缘阳性的处理[J]. 现代妇产科进展, 2014, 23(7): 577-579.