融资融券规模,投资者情绪和股票崩盘风险
Margin Trading Scale, Investor Sentiment and Stock Market Crash Risk
DOI: 10.12677/ORF.2023.134410, PDF,   
作者: 杨海玲:上海工程技术大学数理与统计学院,上海
关键词: 融资融券投资者情绪卡尔曼滤波股市波动Margin Trading Investor Sentiment Kalman Filtering Stock Market Volatility
摘要: 本文首先基于封闭式基金折价、IPO数量及上市首日收益、消费者信心指数和新增投资者开户数等6个单项情绪指标,检验其一阶滞后处理指标间相关性后,应用卡尔曼滤波方法构建投资者情绪指数。随后应用DCC-GARCH模型估计投资者情绪、融资融券规模、股市波动和银行利率四个变量两两之间的动态相关系数。最后应用TVP-SV-VAR模型做不同时期和不同时点下的脉冲响应分析。结果表明:1) 投资者情绪受银行利率的影响程度最大,持续性最强。2) 目前融资融券规模的变化并不能迅速的刺激投资者,融资融券规模的增加对于银行利率以及股价波动的冲击效应较大。3) 股市波动同银行利率的变化息息相关,银行利率的变动可以有效拉高或降低市场收益。对券商风控体系监管、强化信息披露要求和推进投资者教育等方面提出了相应的对策建议。
Abstract: This paper applies the Kalman filter method to construct an investor sentiment index based on six individual sentiment indicators, including closed-end fund discount, number of IPOs and first day of listing returns, consumer confidence index and number of new investor accounts, after testing their first-order lags to process the correlation between the indicators. The DCC-GARCH model was applied to estimate the dynamic correlation coefficients between the four variables of investor sentiment, financing and financing size, stock market volatility and bank interest rates. Finally, TVP-SV-VAR model was applied to analyse the impulse responses at different time periods and different points in time. The results show that 1) Investor sentiment is most influenced by bank interest rates and is the most persistent. 2) Changes in the current margin trading scale do not stimulate investors quickly, and an increase in the scale of financing and financing has a greater impact on bank interest rates and stock price volatility. 3) Stock market fluctuations are closely related to changes in bank interest rates, which can effectively raise or lower market returns. Corresponding countermeasures are proposed for the supervision of the risk control system of brokerage firms, the strengthening of information disclosure requirements and the promotion of investor education.
文章引用:杨海玲. 融资融券规模,投资者情绪和股票崩盘风险[J]. 运筹与模糊学, 2023, 13(4): 4095-4104. https://doi.org/10.12677/ORF.2023.134410

参考文献

[1] Brown, G.W. and Cliff, M.T. (2005) Investor Sentiment and Asset Valuation. The Journal of Business, 78, 405-440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Baker, M. and Wurgler, J. (2006) Investor Sentiment and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns. The Journal of Finance, 61, 1645-1680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] 许红伟, 陈欣. 我国推出融资融券交易促进了标的股票的定价效率吗?——基于双重差分模型的实证研究[J]. 管理世界, 2012(5): 52-61.
[4] 肖浩, 孔爱国. 融资融券对股价特质性波动的影响机理研究: 基于双重差分模型的检验[J]. 管理世界, 2014(8): 30-43+187-188.
[5] 李锋森. 我国融资融券助涨助跌了吗?——基于波动非对称性视角[J]. 金融研究, 2017(2): 147-162.
[6] 李志生, 陈晨, 林秉旋. 空机制提高了中国股票市场的定价效率吗?——基于自然实验的证据[J]. 经济研究, 2015, 50(4): 165-177.
[7] 王朝阳, 王振霞. 涨跌停、融资融券与股价波动率——基于AH股的比较研究[J]. 经济研究, 2017, 52(4): 151-165.
[8] 陈海强, 范云菲. 融资融券交易制度对中国股市波动率的影响——基于面板数据政策评估方法的分析[J]. 金融研究, 2015(6): 159-172.
[9] 蔡志刚, 赖明明. 中国股市投资者情绪指数构建与有效性检验[J]. 金融发展研究, 2016(7): 24-30.
[10] Brown, G.W. and Cliff, M.T. (2004) Investor Sentiment and the Near-Term Stock Market. Journal of Empirical Finance, 11, 1-27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] 江春, 杨力菲, 姜婷婷. 投资者风险态度、资产价格与汇率预期的动态关系研究——基于DCC-GARCH和TVP-SV-VAR模型[J]. 统计研究, 2022, 39(2): 114-129.
[12] 李湛, 刘波. 融资融券标的扩容的结构演变与市场影响[J]. 证券市场导报, 2019(12): 71-75.
[13] 巴曙松, 朱虹. 融资融券、投资者情绪与市场波动[J]. 国际金融研究, 2016(8): 82-96.