人际触摸对认知冲突控制的影响
The Effect of Interpersonal Touch on Cognitive Conflict Control
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2023.138433, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 周润泽*, 杜朋宇, 于明君, 李艳瑾, 杨加芹#：曲阜师范大学心理学院，山东 曲阜
关键词: 人际触摸；冲突控制；Simon任务；空间一致性；Interpersonal Touch； Conflict Control； Simon Mission； Consistency of Space
摘要: 为探究个体受到他人(朋友)触摸是否对冲突任务的控制能力产生影响，采用Simon任务，要求不同人际触摸类型组被试进行按键反应，结果发现：以反应时为因变量，空间一致性和人际触摸类型的主效应显著，朋友在场有触摸条件下被试的反应时显著快于朋友在场无触摸条件，交互作用不显著；以正确率为因变量，主效应和交互作用都不显著。研究表明：人际触摸对于冲突控制产生影响，且相比于无触摸条件，个体在受到触摸时的冲突控制能力更高，即对冲突任务的抑制程度更高。
Abstract: In order to explore whether touch by others (friends) has an impact on the control ability of conflict tasks, the Simon task was used to ask subjects in different interpersonal touch types to perform keystroke response. The results showed that: Taking reaction time as the dependent variable, the main effect of spatial consistency and interpersonal touch type was significant. The response time of subjects in the presence of friends with touch condition was significantly faster than that in the presence of friends without touch condition, and the interaction was not significant. With the accu-racy rate as the dependent variable, the main effect and interaction were not significant. Studies show that interpersonal touch has an impact on conflict control, and compared with no touch condi-tion, individuals have higher conflict control ability when touched, that is, they have a higher degree of inhibition on conflict tasks.
文章引用：周润泽, 杜朋宇, 于明君, 李艳瑾, 杨加芹 (2023). 人际触摸对认知冲突控制的影响. 心理学进展, 13(8), 3455-3464. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2023.138433

参考文献

[1] 胡凤培, 王倩, 徐莲, 葛列众(2012). 基于Flanker、Stroop和Simon多重冲突驱动的认知控制机制. 心理科学, 35(2), 276-281.
[2] 王艳梅, 郭德俊(2008). 积极情绪对任务转换的影响. 心理学报, 40(3), 301-306.
[3] 杨雪, 朱旭(2022). 情感触摸对心理健康的影响及应用. 心理科学进展, 30(12), 2789-2798.
[4] Barahmand, U., Shamsina, N., Carvey, K., Acheta, A. M., & Sanchez, O. (2023). The Associations between Attitudes Toward Inter-personal Affective Touch, Negative Cognitions and Social Anxiety: A Pilot Study. Psychiatry: Interpersonal & Biologi-cal Processes, 86, 53-66.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict Monitoring and Cognitive Control. Psychological Review, 108, 624-652.[CrossRef] 
[6] Braver, T. S., & Cohen, J. D. (1999). Dopamine, Cognitive Control, and Schizophrenia: The Gating Model. In J. A. Reggia, E. Ruppin, & D. Glanzman (Eds.), Pro-gress in Brain Research (Vol. 121, pp. 327-349). Elsevier.[CrossRef] 
[7] Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., & Cohen, J. D. (1999). Cogni-tion and Control in Schizophrenia: A Computational Model of Dopamine and Prefrontal Function. Biological Psychi-atry, 46, 312-328.[CrossRef] 
[8] Carter, C. S., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M. et al. (1998). Anterior Cingulate Cortex, Error Detection, and the Online Monitoring of Performance. Science, 280, 747-749.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Coan, J. A., Schaefer, H. S., & Davidson, R. J. (2006). Lending a Hand: Social Regulation of the Neural Response to Threat. Psychological Science, 17, 1032-1039.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Cohen, J. D., & Servan-Schreiber, D. (1992). Context, Cortex and Dopamine: A Connectionist Approach to Behavior and Biology in Schizophrenia. Psychological Review, 99, 45-77.[CrossRef] 
[11] Dreisbach, G. (2006). How Positive Affect Modulates Cognitive Control: The Costs and Benefits of Reduced Maintenance Capability. Brain and Cognition, 60, 11-19.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Dreisbach, G., & Goschke, T. (2004). How Positive Affect Modulates Cognitive Control: Reduced Perseveration at the Cost of Increased Distractibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 343-353.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Egner, T., & Hirsch, J. (2005). Cognitive Control Mechanisms Resolve Conflict through Cortical Amplification of Task-Relevant Information. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1784-1790.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Egner, T., Delano, M., & Hirsch, J. (2007). Separate Conflict-Specific Cog-nitive Control Mechanisms in the Human Brain. NeuroImage, 35, 940-948.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Fotopoulou, A., & Tsakiris, M. (2017). Mentalizing Ho-meostasis: The Social Origins of Interoceptive Inference. Neuropsychoanalysis, 19, 3-28.[CrossRef] 
[16] Hertenstein, M. J., Keltner, D., App, B., Bulleit, B. A., & Jaskolka, A. R. (2006). Touch Communicates Distinct Emotions. Emotion, 6, 528-533.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Hornik, J. (1992). Tactile Stimulation and Consumer Response. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 449-458.[CrossRef] 
[18] Johnson, M. (2015). Embodied Understanding. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 875.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Kerns, J. G., Cohen, J. D., MacDonald, A. W. et al. (2004). Ante-rior Cingulated Conflict Monitoring and Adjustments in Control. Science, 303, 1023-1026.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional Overlap: Cognitive Basis for Stimulus-Response Compatibility—A Model and Taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253-270.[CrossRef] 
[21] Liljencrantz, J., & Olausson, H. (2014). Tactile C Fi-bers and Their Contributions to Pleasant Sensations and to Tactile Allodynia. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 8, Article 37.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] McGlone, F., Wessberg, J., & Olausson, H. (2014). Discriminative and Affective Touch: Sensing and Feeling. Neuron, 82, 737-755.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An Integrative Theory of Prefrontal Cortex Function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24, 167-202.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Morrison, I. (2016). ALE Meta-Analysis Reveals Dissocia-ble Networks for Affective and Discriminative Aspects of Touch. Human Brain Mapping, 37, 1308-1320.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Morrison, I., Löken, L., & Olausson, H. (2010). The Skin as a Social Organ. Experimental Brain Research, 204, 305-314.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] O’Reilly, R. C., Noelle, D. C., Braver, T. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2002). Prefrontal Cortex and Dynamic Categorization Tasks: Representational Organization and Neuromodulatory Control. Cerebral Cortex, 12, 246-257.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Olausson, H., Wessberg, J., Morrison, I., & McGlone, F. (2016). Af-fective Touch and the Neurophysiology of CT Afferents. Springer.[CrossRef] 
[28] Olausson, H., Wessberg, J., Morrison, I., McGlone, F., & Vallbo, A. (2010). The Neurophysiology of Unmyelinated Tactile Afferents. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 34, 185-191.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Pessoa, L., Padmala, S., Kenzer, A., & Bauer, A. (2012). Interactions between Cognition and Emotion during Response Inhibition. Emotion, 12, 192-197.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Simon, J. R. (1969). Reactions toward the Source of Stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 174-176.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] Simon, J. R., & Berbaum, K. (1990). Effect of Conflicting Cues on In-formation Processing: The “Stroop Effect” vs. the “Simon Effect”. Acta Psychologica, 73, 159-170.[CrossRef] 
[32] Tajadura-Jiménez, A., Lorusso, L., & Tsakiris, M. (2013). Active and Passive-Touch during Interpersonal Multisensory Stimulation Change Self-Other Boundaries. Con-sciousness and Cognition, 22, 1352-1360.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[33] Van der Stigchel, S., Imants, P., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2011). Positive Affect Increases Cognitive Control in the Antisaccade Task. Brain and Cognition, 75, 177-181.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[34] Wittig, R. M., Crockford, C., Lehmann, J. et al. (2008). Fo-cused Grooming Networks and Stress Alleviation in Wild Female Baboons. Hormones and Behavior, 54, 170-177.[CrossRef] [PubMed]