论美国域外管辖措施与我国阻断立法的完善

On the Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Measures of the United States and the Perfection of Blocking Legislation in China

摘要: 对于美国的域外管辖行为，各国纷纷在法律层面上进行回应。各国阻断立法的实践对我国的阻断立法机制以及国际性的阻断立法机制均有着借鉴意义。笔者对比研究了具有现代阻断立法代表性的欧盟的《阻断法案》及英国《贸易利益保护法》以及我国新出台的《阻断办法》的核心制度，认为我国《阻断办法》存在对象模糊、立法技术粗糙、执行力欠缺等不足，同时也缺乏实践应用，故笔者认为可以从时效性、制度落实、联合执法、国际合作等方面对我国《阻断办法》进行完善。

Abstract: For the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the United States, countries have responded at the legal level. These practices of blocking legislation can be used as a reference for China’s locking legislation mechanism as well as international blocking legislation mechanism. The author makes a comparative study of the core systems of the “Blocking Act” of the European Union, the “Trade Interests Protection Act” of the United Kingdom and the new “Blocking Measures” of China, which are representative of modern blocking legislation. It is believed that China’s “Blocking Measures” has some shortcomings, such as vague objects, rough legislative techniques, lack of execution, and lack of practical application. Therefore, the author believes that China’s “Blocking Measures” can be im-proved from the aspects of timeliness, system implementation, joint law enforcement, and international cooperation.