NLR联合彩色多普勒超声显像评分评估结石性胆囊炎的严重程度及临床价值
NLR Combined with Color Doppler Ultrasonography Score to Evaluate the Severity and Clinical Value of Calculous Cholecystitis
摘要: 目的:研究中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)联合彩色多普勒超声显像评分评估结石性胆囊炎的严重程度及临床价值。方法:选择我院2021年1月~2022年4月收治的100例结石性胆囊炎患者作为观察组。另选取同期单纯胆囊结石患者500例作为对照组。检测并比较两组NLR、降钙素原(PCT)以及C反应蛋白(CRP)水平。观察组结石性胆囊炎按临床表现分为轻、中、重度,所有患者均进行彩色多普勒超声检查,分析不同病情严重程度结石性胆囊炎患者的超声显像评分以及血清NLR、PCT、CRP水平的差异。结果:观察组血清NLR、PCT以及CRP水平分别为(8.17 ± 1.04)、(2.66 ± 0.44) ng/ml、(52.34 ± 12.35) mg/L,均高于对照组的(5.11 ± 0.95)、(1.92 ± 0.35) ng/ml、(20.47 ± 7.12) mg/L (均P < 0.05)。中度组、重度组彩色多普勒超声显像评分 ≤ 5分人数占比均低于轻度组,而≥10分人数占比均高于轻度组,且重度组≥10分人数占比高于中度组;中度组彩色多普勒超声显像评分6~9分人数占比均高于轻度组、重度组(均P < 0.05)。重度组血清NLR、PCT以及CRP水平分别为(13.34 ± 1.45)、(4.35 ± 0.59) ng/ml、(77.58 ± 16.22) mg/L,均高于轻度组的(6.42 ± 0.39)、(1.48 ± 0.46) ng/ml、(42.49 ± 6.29) mg/L以及中度组的(8.05 ± 1.12)、(2.63 ± 0.47) ng/ml、(50.89 ± 10.36) mg/L;且中度组血清NLR、PCT以及CRP水平均高于轻度组(均P < 0.05)。结论:NLR联合彩色多普勒超声显像评分评估结石性胆囊炎的严重程度具有较高临床价值。
Abstract: Objective: To study the severity and clinical value of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) combined with color Doppler ultrasonography score in evaluating calculous cholecystitis. Methods: 100 pa-tients with calculous cholecystitis treated in our hospital from January 2021 to April 2022 were se-lected as the observation group. Another 500 patients with simple gallstone in the same period were selected as the control group. The levels of NLR, procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were detected and compared between the two groups. The observation group was divided into mild, moderate and severe calculous cholecystitis according to clinical manifestations, color Doppler ultrasonography was performed on all observation groups, and the differences of ultrasonic imaging score and serum NLR, PCT and CRP levels in patients with different severity of calculous cholecystitis were analyzed. Results: Serum NLR, PCT and CRP levels in observation group were (8.17 ± 1.04), (2.66 ± 0.44) ng/mL and (52.34 ± 12.35) mg/L, respectively, which was higher than control group (5.11 ± 0.95), (1.92 ± 0.35) ng/mL, (20.47 ± 7.12) mg/L (P < 0.05). The proportion of patients with color Doppler imaging score ≤ 5 in moderate group and severe group was lower than that in mild group, while the proportion of patients with color Doppler imaging score ≥ 10 was higher than that in mild group, and the proportion of patients with color Doppler imaging score ≥ 10 in severe group was higher than that in moderate group. The proportion of color Doppler ultra-sonography score of 6~9 in moderate group was higher than that in mild group and severe group (P < 0.05). Serum NLR, PCT and CRP levels in severe group were (13.34 ± 1.45), (4.35 ± 0.59) ng/ mL and (77.58 ± 16.22) mg/L, respectively, higher than those in mild group (6.42 ± 0.39), (1.48 ± 0.46) ng/ml, (42.49 ± 6.29) mg/L and moderate group (8.05 ± 1.12), (2.63 ± 0.47) ng/ml, (50.89 ± 10.36) mg/L. Serum NLR, PCT and CRP levels in moderate group were higher than those in mild group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: NLR combined with color Doppler ultrasonography score has high clinical value in evaluating the severity of calculous cholecystitis.
文章引用:黄文胤, 费书珂, 欧阳征仁, 杨琴, 谢学文. NLR联合彩色多普勒超声显像评分评估结石性胆囊炎的严重程度及临床价值[J]. 临床医学进展, 2023, 13(8): 13766-13771. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2023.1381923

参考文献

[1] 杜国涛, 王青, 赵伟伟, 等. 胆、肠菌群差异性与胆囊胆固醇结石形成关系[J]. 肝胆胰外科杂志, 2022, 34(3): 138-144.
[2] 武军. 早期和延期腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性结石性胆囊炎临床疗效比较[J]. 山西医药杂志, 2021, 50(13): 2078-2080.
[3] 石卉, 万军, 徐世平, 等. 老年胆系感染患者临床特征分析及死亡风险评估[J]. 中华内科杂志, 2019, 58(6): 415-418.
[4] 屈红阳, 史帆, 刘芳. 介入超声联合胆道镜双通道“一步法”在高龄急性结石性胆囊炎患者治疗中的效果分析[J]. 贵州医药, 2021, 45(5): 721-722.
[5] Shirinow, Z.T., Aliev, Y.G., Gamidova, N.A., Mehtizadeh S.M. and Akhmedov D.S. (2021) Diagnosis and Surgical Treatment of Acute Destructive Calculous Cholecystitis in Advanced Age Patients. Khirurgiia, No. 6, 24-29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] 刘成栋, 谢泽民, 崔巍. 术前中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比率对老年胆囊结石伴急性胆囊炎严重程度的预测价值[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2023, 43(5): 1080-1082.
[7] 李征, 郑亚民. 急性胆囊炎东京指南与欧洲世界急诊外科协会指南的比较[J]. 中华肝胆外科杂志, 2021, 27(11): 875-880.
[8] 洪乔友. 超声显像计分法判定急性胆囊炎的病情程度与手术时机[J]. 中国保健营养(下半月), 2010(4): 32.
[9] 李倩, 李航, 李相磊. 术前T细胞亚群(CD3+、CD4+、CD8+、CD4+/CD8+)、NLR及PLR比值对化脓性胆囊炎的预测价值[J]. 实验与检验医学, 2021, 39(5): 1114-1116, 1121.
[10] 阮华兵, 王东. 中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值与血小板/淋巴细胞比值在上消化道溃疡穿孔中的鉴别诊断价值[J]. 临床急诊杂志, 2020, 21(2): 147-152.
[11] 陈卫阳, 张兴龙, 丁文元. 术前C-反应蛋白/白蛋白和降钙素原对老年急性胆囊炎严重程度的预测价值[J]. 中国卫生检验杂志, 2020, 30(13): 1623-1625, 1643.
[12] 杨瑞军, 白筱晞. 腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性结石性胆囊炎的效果及对炎症因子及血清淀粉酶水平的影响[J]. 贵州医药, 2020, 44(4): 579-580.
[13] 陈敏. 降钙素原和C反应蛋白在鉴别老年人急性胆道感染中的价值[J]. 上海医药, 2019, 40(2): 13-15, 33.
[14] Wee, N.K., Cheong, W.S.C. and Low, H.M. (2021) CT and MRI Findings of Acute Calculous Cholecystitis and Its Complications in Singapore: A Picto-rial Review. Medical Journal of Malaysia, 76, 706-713.
[15] 陈俊光, 邓晓妃, 林树俊, 等. 急性化脓性胆囊炎患者超声影像学特点及其诊断价值[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志, 2022, 25(1): 116-119.