众创时代著作权纠纷调解与联动机制研究
Research on the Intellectual Property Disputes Mediation and Linkage Mechanism in Era of “Crowd-Creation”
摘要: 数字技术和网络平台为众创时代奠定基础,著作权纠纷也出现了许多新特点,如数量增加、专业性加强等。在众创时代以前,著作权纠纷调解及联动机制框架已然建立,但存在人民调解、行政调解立法不完善等问题,新型著作权纠纷导致行业性、专业性调解与行政调解的制度供给需求增加,当前三调联动机制替代性较强。为应对众创时代的著作权纠纷,应当加强调解制度立法,建立调解组织、规范调解与监督程序等;完善三调联动机制,需加强合作性,衔接调解制度的机制受案范围、主体组织、调解程序等方面,创新联动方式。
Abstract: Digital technology and network platforms have laid the foundation for the Era of “Crowd-Creation”. Copyright disputes have emerged with many new features, such as the increasing number and professionalism of copyright disputes. Before the Era of “Crowd-Creation”, the framework of intellectual property disputes mediation and linkage mechanism has been established. Meanwhile, legal provisions of People’s mediation and administrative mediation are not perfect and there are many problems. Faced with new copyright disputes, industryspecific professional people’s mediation and administrative mediation system supply is insufficient, and the highly substituted “Three Mediation Linkage” needs to strengthen cooperation. Therefore, in order to cope with copyright disputes in the Era of “Crowd-Creation”, the legislation of the mediation system should be promoted to fund mediation organizations, standardize mediation and supervise procedures. The “Three Mediation Linkage” should be improved to clarify the scope of application of mediation, enhance cooperation of organizations and procedures, and innovate linkage methods.
文章引用:刘思昊. 众创时代著作权纠纷调解与联动机制研究[J]. 争议解决, 2023, 9(5): 2018-2023. https://doi.org/10.12677/DS.2023.95273

参考文献

[1] 徐珉川. “众创”时代数字内容侵权中的“思想/表达二分” [J]. 法学评论, 2022, 40(6): 58-70.
[2] 国家版权局网. 2021年度中国网络版权保护报告[EB/OL].
https://www.ncac.gov.cn/chinacopyright/contents/12227/357356.shtml, 2023-06-29.
[3] 蒋舸. 论著作权法的“宽进宽出”结构[J]. 中外法学, 2021, 33(2): 327-345.
[4] 张西恒. 人民调解专业化问题探讨[J]. 理论探索, 2019(4): 123-128.
[5] 张舒琳, 张立平. 著作权纠纷专业调解机制的法律定位及完善[J]. 湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版) , 2018, 42(3): 39-44.
[6] 北京市知识产权局网. 中国知识产权报: 知识产权纠纷调解“北京经验”再升级[EB/OL].
http://zscqj.beijing.gov.cn/zscqj/index/index.html, 2023-06-29.
[7] 李伟民. 知识产权行政执法与司法裁判衔接机制研究[J]. 中国应用法学, 2021(2): 100-123.
[8] 王聪. 作为诉源治理机制的行政调解: 价值重塑与路径优化[J]. 行政法学研究, 2021(5): 55-66.
[9] 兰荣杰. 人民调解: 复兴还是转型? [J]. 清华法学, 2018, 12(4): 111-127.
[10] 许可, 肖冰. 替代性纠纷解决机制在著作权侵权纠纷中的适用——以著作权集体管理组织为原告的案件为例[J]. 山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019(2): 78-85.
[11] 冯晓青, 刘政操. 技术创新视野下网络著作权保护的困境及其破解[J]. 湖南师范大学社会科学学报, 2021, 50(6): 114-124.
[12] 孙昊亮, 张少帅. 知识产权替代性纠纷解决机制的构建[J]. 理论导刊, 2010(11): 100-101+109.
[13] 何炼红, 邓文武. 知识产权纠纷调解确认机制的体系协调与功效衔接[J]. 湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2023, 47(2): 64-72.
[14] 解放. 关于修改完善《人民调解法》的若干思考[J]. 人大研究, 2022(11): 30-32.
[15] 柯林霞. 著作权纠纷调解委员会制度: 域外经验与立法完善[J]. 出版广角, 2017(24): 37-39.
[16] 陈正芹, 吴涛. 城市风险治理中的人民调解问题研究[J]. 理论视野, 2022(1): 68-73.