交通管理非现场执法程序正当性研究
Study on the Legitimacy of Off-Site Law Enforcement Procedures of Traffic Management
摘要: 《新一代人工智能发展规划》提出人工智能在政府治理、社会服务等领域发挥了一定的影响作用。在行政法学领域,自动化方式的引入使得当下行政行为作出的方式产生了深刻的影响。近几年由于受到新冠病毒疫情的影响,无需人工参与就能实现部分行政行为,一定程度上减少了行政相对人的接触,让我们看到了技术浸入到行政领域,掀起了自动化行政的热潮。交通行政非现场执法是一种自动行政的行政手段,尽管行政机关的行政效能得到了提升,但同时也带来了行政相对人陈述、申辩易被压缩;证据认定流于形式;行政机关说明理由面临变动等关涉行政正当程序的挑战。非现场执法使用技术设备来收集、固定违法事实的核心和执行过程的不独立性,说明《行政处罚法》不需要另外增加非现场执行程序,但可以根据现有的诉讼框架进行适当调整,以应付各种挑战,包括:陈述的空间和扩展说明理由的内容。
Abstract: The Plan for the Development of the New Generation of Artificial Intelligence proposes that AI has played a certain influential role in government governance, social services and other fields. In the field of administrative law, the introduction of automation has had a profound impact on the way that administrative actions are made today. In recent years, due to the impact of the novel coronavirus epidemic, some administrative acts can be realized without manual participation, which reduces the contact of administrative counterparts to a certain extent, let us see the technology immersed into the administrative field, and set off the upsurge of automatic administration. The administrative off-site law enforcement of traffic administration is an administrative means of automatic administration. Although the administrative efficiency of administrative organs has been improved, it also brings the challenges of administrative due process, such as the statement of the administrative counterpart, the defense easy to be compressed, the evidence identification becoming a formality, and the administrative organs facing changes in explaining the reasons. Off-site law enforcement uses technical equipment to collect and fix the core of illegal facts and the independence of the execution process, which shows that there is no need to add off-site execution procedures to the Administrative Punishment Law, but it can be appropriately adjusted according to the existing litigation framework to meet various challenges, including: the space for statement and the expansion of the content of reasons.
文章引用:谢婷婷. 交通管理非现场执法程序正当性研究[J]. 争议解决, 2023, 9(5): 2046-2052. https://doi.org/10.12677/DS.2023.95277

参考文献

[1] 谢明睿, 余凌云. 技术赋能交警非现场执法对行政程序的挑战及完善[J]. 法学杂志, 2021, 42(3): 48-58.
[2] 茅铭晨. 从自定走向法定——我国《行政处罚法》修改背景下的非现场执法程序立法研究[J]. 政治与法律, 2020(6): 14-27.
[3] 余凌云. 交警非现场执法的规范构建[J]. 法学研究, 2021, 43(3): 36-51.
[4] 秦明亮. 非现场执法问题研究——兼论《行政处罚法》第41条[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 杭州: 浙江工商大学, 2022.
[5] 高雷利, 王婧, 赵海珍, 等. 生态环境领域利用电子技术监控设备开展非现场执法初探[J]. 环境保护, 2021, 49(9): 60-63.
[6] 姜明安. 行政程序研究[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2006: 166.
[7] 杨戴如. 交警非现场执法的程序正当性探析[J]. 北京警察学院学报, 2023(2): 40-46.
[8] 江国华, 张彬. 证据的内涵与依法取证——以行政处罚证据的收集为分析视角[J]. 证据科学, 2016, 24(6): 645-655.
[9] Brauneis, R. and Goodman, E.P. (2017) Algorithmic Transparency for the Smart City. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 冯世昌. 智慧城市中的行政处罚程序问题研究[J]. 河南科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 41(3): 73-77.