异性拒绝对择偶价值感的影响：择偶计量器的检验
The Influence of Mate-Rejection on Self-Perceived Mate Value: Testing the Mating Sociometer
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2012.25038, PDF, HTML, XML,  被引量    国家科技经费支持
作者: 阮鲁君*, 张 林：宁波大学教育学院心理学系
关键词: 自尊；异性拒绝；择偶价值感；择偶标准；Self-Esteem; Mate-Rejection; Self-Perceived Mate Value; Mate Standard
摘要: 采用回忆范式考察来自异性的拒绝对个体的积极/消极情感、自尊、择偶价值感及择偶标准的影响。实验结果发现：1) 来自异性的拒绝对个体的积极/消极情感产生了影响，自尊在两者之间起了完全的中介作用；2) 异性拒绝通过自尊对择偶价值感产生影响，而择偶价值感在自尊与择偶标准之间起中介作用，由此构建成了一个过程模型。本研究支持和扩展了Kirkpatrick和Ellis(2001)所提出的特定领域社会计量器——择偶计量器的构想：自尊作为一种内在机制，调节着异性拒绝后个体的择偶价值感，并间接影响择偶标准。
Abstract: The present study which using recall paradigm aimed to investigate the effect of  mate-rejection on positive affect and negative affect, self-esteem, self-perceived mate value, mate standard. The result showed: 1)  Mate-rejection makes an impact on positive affect and negative affect, while self-esteem plays fully the mediating role among them; 2) Self-esteem fully mediated the impact of mate-rejection on self-perceived mate value, and self-perceived mate value fully mediated the impact of self-esteem on mate standard, thus a process model was built. This research supports and expands a conceptualization of the domain-specific sociometer, which is derived from Kirkpatrick and Ellis (2001): self-esteem as a mechanism functions to calibrate self-perceived mate value in response to experiences of mate-rejection, and makes an indirect effect on mate standard.
文章引用：阮鲁君, 张林 (2012). 异性拒绝对择偶价值感的影响：择偶计量器的检验. 心理学进展, 2(5), 243-249. http://dx.doi.org/10.12677/AP.2012.25038

参考文献

[1] 程苏, 刘璐, 郑涌(2011). 社会排斥的研究范式与理论模型. 心理科学进展, 6期, 905-915.
[2] 刘翠娜(2008). 社会地位对男性择偶标准的影响研究. 华东师范大学硕士论文, 上海.
[3] 汪向东, 王希林, 马弘(1999). 心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版). 北京: 中国心理卫生杂志.
[4] 温忠麟, 张雷, 侯杰泰(2004). 中介效应检验程序及其应用. 心理学报, 5期, 614-620.
[5] Anthony, C. L., & Helena, M. (2006). Viewing attractive or unattractive same-sex individuals changes self-rated attractiveness and face preferences in women. Animal Behaviour, 5, 981-987.
[6] Back, M. D., Penke, L., Schmukle, S. C., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2011). Knowing your own mate value: Sex-specific personality effects on the accuracy of expected mate choices. Psychological Science, 22, 984-989.
[7] Baumeister, R. F., & Dewall, C. N. (2005). Inner disruption following social exclusion: Reduced intelligent thought and self-regulation failure. In: K. D. Williams, & W. von Hippel, (Eds.), The social outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and bullying. New York: Psychology Press, 53-73.
[8] Buckley, K. E., Winkel, R. E., & Leary, M. K. (2004). Reactions to acceptance and rejection: Effects of level and sequence of relational evaluation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 14-28.
[9] Edlund, E. J. (2008). Sex, lies, and partner choice: An investigation into perceived mate value and its factor structure, content, concurrent, convergent, and discriminant validities. Northern Illinois Uni-versity, Unpublished.
[10] Edlund, E. J., & Sagarin, J. B. (2010). Mate value and mate preferences: An investigation into decisions made with and without constraints. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 835-839.
[11] Feingold, A. (1988). Matching for attractiveness in romantic partners and same-sex friends—A meta-analysis and theoretical critique. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 226-235.
[12] Fisher, M., et al. (2008). Components of self-perceived mate value. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 2, 156- 168.
[13] Gutierres, S. E., Kenrick, D. T., & Partch, J. J. (1999). Beauty, dominance, and the mating game: Contrast effects in self-assessment re flect gender differences in mate selection. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1126-1134.
[14] Kavanagh, P. S., Robins, S. C., & Ellis, B. J. (2010). The mating sociometer: A regulatory mechanism for mating aspirations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 120-132.
[15] Kenrick, D. T., et al. (1990). Evolution, traits, and the stages of human courtship: Qualifying the parental investment model. Journal of Personality, 48, 97-116.
[16] Kirkpatrick, L. A., & Ellis, B. J. (2001) An evolutionary-psychological approach to self-esteem: Multiple domains and multiple functions. In: M. Clark, & G. Fletcher, (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook in social psychology, Interpersonal processes (pp. 411-436). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
[17] Kirkpatrick, L. A., & Ellis, B. J. (2006). The adaptive functions of self-evaluative psychological mechanisms. In: M. H. Kernis, (Ed.), Self-esteem issues and answers: A sourcebook of current perspectives (pp. 334-339). New York: Psychology Press.
[18] Lalumiere, M. L., & Quinsey, V. L. (1996). Sexual deviance, anti sociality, mating effort, and the use of sexually coercive behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 33-48.
[19] Leary, M. R., et al. (1995). Self-esteem as an interpersonal monitor: The sociometer hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 518-530.
[20] Leary, M. R., et al. (1998). Calibrating the sociometer: The relationship between interpersonal appraisals and state self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1290-1299.
[21] Leary, M. R., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000). The nature and function of self-esteem: Sociometer theory. In: M. P. Zanna, (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 1-62). San Diego: Academic Press.
[22] Leary, M. R. (2005). Sociometer theory and the pursuit of relational value: Getting to the root of self-esteem. European Review of Social Psychology, 16, 75-111.
[23] Maner, J. K., et al. (2007). Does social exclusion motivate interpersonal reconnection? Resolving the “porcupine problem”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 42-55.
[24] McFarland, C., & Ross, M. (1982). Impact of causal attributions on affective reactions to success and failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 937-946.
[25] Miller, G. (2000). The mating mind: How sexual choice shaped the evolution of human nature. London: Vintage.
[26] Pass, J. A., Lindenberg, S. M., & Park, J. H. (2010). All you need is love: Is the sociometer especially sensitive to one’s mating capacity? European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 221-234.
[27] Penke, L., Todd, P. M., Lenton, A. P., & Fasolo, B. (2008). How self- assessments can guide human mating decisions. In: G. Geher, & G. F. Miller, (Eds.), Mating intelligence: Sex, relationships, and the mind’s reproductive system (pp. 37-75). New York: Erlbaum.
[28] Sakai, D. K., & Johnson, R. C. (1997). Active phenotypic assortment in mate selection: Self-descriptions and sought-for attributes of mates in dating advertisements. Social Biology, 44, 258-264.
[29] Surbey, M. K., & Brice, G. R. (2007). Enhancement of self-perceived mate value precedes a shift in men’s preferred mating strategy. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 39, 513-522.
[30] Williams, K. D. (2007). Ostracism. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 425-452.
[31] Zeigler-Hill, V., Campe, J. W., & Myers, E. M. (2009). How low will men with high self-esteem go? Self-esteem as a moderator of sex differences in minimum relationship standards. Sex Roles, 61, 491- 500.