文本阅读中的插图效应
Illustration Effect in the Text Reading
摘要: 插图效应是指插图对学习者所起到的心理作用，包括记忆、理解、问题解决等认知方面的作用，也包括注意、兴趣、情感等非认知作用。早在20世纪30年代一些研究者就开始了对插图效应的实证研究，到目前为止已有大量的研究从不同的角度对插图效应进行了考察。本文对插图的分类、插图效应的相关理论、插图效应的影响因素进行了综述，总结出了插图使用的十条原则，提出了未来关于插图研究的几点思考。
Abstract:  Illustration Effect refers to the psychological role of illustration on the learner, including the role of the cognitive aspects of memory, understanding, and problem solving, also including attention, interest, and emotional aspects of the role of non-cognitive. Early as the 1930s some researchers began empirical study of the illustration effect; so far a lot of researches investigated illustration effect from a different perspective. Classifications of the illustrations, the theory of the illustration effect, influencing factors were reviewed in this article. Finally, ten principles of the illustrations using were summarized, and some thoughts on the study of illustrations were proposed.
文章引用：张建鹏, 李寿欣 (2012). 文本阅读中的插图效应. 心理学进展, 2(5), 250-255. http://dx.doi.org/10.12677/AP.2012.25039

参考文献

[1] 陈红香, 张必隐(1997). 小学三、五年级学生阅读理解中插图效应的研究. 心理科学, 5期, 464-465.
[2] 崔爱珍(2011). 不同认知方式大学生阅读过程中的插图效应. 山东师范大学硕士论文, 济南.
[3] 邓春暖(2006). 不同场认知方式大学生图文阅读中的插图效应. 云南师范大学硕士论文, 昆明.
[4] 沈德立, 陶云(2001). 初中生有无插图课文的眼动过程研究. 心理科学, 4期, 385-388.
[5] 杨震(2003). 小学一年级语文标准实验教科书中课文插图评价研究.辽宁师范大学硕士论文, 大连.
[6] 张弘毅(2010). 插图类型与呈现方式对不同认知风格初中生认知负荷的影响. 河南大学硕士论文, 开封.
[7] Ainsworth, S., & Loizou, A. T. (2003). The effects of self-explaining when learning with text or diagrams. Cognitive Science, 27, 669- 681.
[8] Atkinson, R. K., Levin, J. R., Kiewra, K. A., Meyers, T., Kim, S., Atkinson, L. A., Renandya, W. A., & Hwang, Y. (1999). Matrix and mnemonic text-processing adjuncts: Comparing and combining their components. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 342-357.
[9] Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Science, 255, 556-559.
[10] Balluerka, N. (1995). The influence of instructions, outlines, and illustrations on the comprehension and recall of scientific texts. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20, 369-375.
[11] Berends, I. E., van Lieshout, & Ernest, C. D. M. (2009). The effect of illustrations in arithmetic problem-solving: Effects of increased cognitive load. Learning and Instruction, 19, 345-353.
[12] Betrancourt, M., & Bisseret, A. (1998). Integrating textual and pictorial information via pop-up windows: An experimental study. Behaviour and Information Technology, 17, 263-273.
[13] Beveridge, M., & Griffiths, V. (1987). The effect of pictures on the reading processes of less able readers: A miscue analysis approach. Journal of Research in Reading, 10, 29-42.
[14] Butcher, K. R. (2006). Learning from text with diagrams: Promoting metal model development and inference generation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 182-197.
[15] Carlson, R., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2003). Learning and understanding science instructional material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 2629-2640.
[16] Carney, R. N., & Levin, J. R. (2002). Pictorial illustrations still improve students’ learning from text. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 5-26.
[17] David, P. (1998). News concreteness and visual-verbal association: Do news pictures narrow the recall gap between concrete and abstract news? Human Communication Research, 25, 180-201.
[18] Dretzke, B. J. (1993). Effects of pictorial mnemonic strategy usage on prose recall of young, middle-aged, and older adults. Educational Gerontology, 19, 489-502.
[19] Glenberg, A. M., & Langston, W. E. (1992). Comprehension of illus- trated text: Pictures help to build mental models. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 129-151.
[20] Levin, J. R., Anglin, G. J., & Carney, R. N. (1987). On empirically validating functions of pictures in prose. In: D. M. Willows, & H. A. Houghton, (Eds.), The psychology of illustration: I. basic research (pp. 51-85). New York: Springer.
[21] Levin, J. R., & Berry, J. K. (1980). Children’s learning of all the news that's fit to picture. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 28, 177-185.
[22] Levin, J. R., Divine-Hawkins, P., Kerst, S. M., & Guttmann, J. (1974). Individual differences in learning from pictures and words: The development and application of an instrument. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 296-303.
[23] Levin, J. R. (1982). Pictures as prose-learning devices. In: A. Flammer, & W. Kintsch, (Eds.), Discourse processing (pp. 412-444). Amster- dam: North-Holland.
[24] Liu, C. J., Kemper, S., & McDowd, C. (2009). The use of illustration to improve older adults’ comprehension of health-related information: Is it helpful? Patient Education and Counseling, 76, 283-288.
[25] Marcus, N., Cooper, M., & Sweller, J. (1996). Understanding instructions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 49-63.
[26] Mayer, R. E., & Gallini, J. K. (1990). When is an illustration worth ten thousand words? Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 715-726.
[27] Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge Uni- versity Press.
[28] McCrudden, M. T., Magliano, J. P., & Schraw, G. (2011). The Effect of diagrams on online reading processes and memory. Discourse Processes, 48, 69-92.
[29] Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press．
[30] Peeck, J. (1993). Increasing picture effects in learning from illustrated text. Learning and Instruction, 3, 227-238.
[31] Reid, D. J., & Beveridge, M. (1990). Reading illustrated science texts: A micro-computer investigation of children’s strategies. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 60, 76-87.
[32] Rubman, C. N., & Waters, H. S. (2000). The role of reconstructive processes in children’s comprehension monitoring. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 503-514.
[33] Samuels, S. J. (1970). Effects of pictures on learning to read, comprehension and attitudes. Review of Educational Research, 40, 397-407.
[34] Sweller, J. (1998). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effect on leaning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257-285.
[35] Torcasio, S., & Sweller, J. (2010). The use of illustrations when learning to read: A cognitive load theory approach. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24, 659-672.