危害野生动物犯罪的刑事法律问题探讨
Discussion on Criminal and Legal Issues of Crimes against Wildlife
摘要: 国家将野生动物纳入法律保护的范围,用国家强制力对其进行保护。在《刑法修正案(十一)》中,最高人民法院和最高人民检察院根据目前的司法实践的状况,对刑法罪名进行了补充和修改,将原来的两个罪名合并成了一个危害珍贵、濒危野生动物罪。省略了之前繁琐的内容,但是同时也全面涵盖了关于野生动物犯罪的不同行为方式。刑法对破坏野生动物的刑法进行处罚是对禁止这类行为保护法益的重要措施,也是有效保护公共健康安全的有效措施,更是保护野生动物资源,保护生态环境,维护物种多样性的必要措施。但是围绕危害野生动物犯罪仍然有许多存在争议的话题,围绕着这一犯罪的司法认定等问题继续展开论证。
Abstract:
The state incorporates wild animals into the scope of legal protection and uses national coercive force to protect them. In the Eleventh Amendment to the Criminal Law, the Supreme People’s Court and the Supreme People’s Procuratorate supplemented and modified the criminal law charges based on the current judicial practice, merging the original two charges into one crime of endangering precious and endangered wildlife. Omitted the previous tedious content, but also comprehensively covered the different ways of behavior related to wildlife crime. Punishment of criminal law against wildlife destruction is an important measure to protect legal interests against such acts, and also an effective measure to effectively protect public health and safety. It is also a necessary measure to protect wildlife resources, protect the ecological environment, and maintain species diversity. However, there are still many controversial topics surrounding the crime of endangering wildlife, and the judicial determination of this crime continues to be debated.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
彭文华. 刑法分论[M]. 厦门: 厦门大学出版社, 2012: 235.
|
|
[2]
|
朱建华. 刑法分论[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2018: 351.
|
|
[3]
|
马海燕. 野生动物保护理论问题探述[J]. 农业与技术, 2016, 36(6): 253.
|
|
[4]
|
叶良芳, 应家赟. 人工驯养繁殖的野生动物属于刑法的规制范围吗?——兼评《关于审理破坏野生动物资源刑事案件具体应用法律若干问题的解释》第1条[J]. 安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019, 43(2): 85-92.
|
|
[5]
|
车浩. 法定犯时代的违法性认识错误[J]. 清华法学, 2015, 9(4): 22-46.
|
|
[6]
|
张明楷. 刑法学[M]. 第5版. 北京: 法律出版社, 2016: 292.
|
|
[7]
|
何怀宏. 生态伦理[M]. 保定: 河北大学出版社, 2002: 85-86.
|