智慧城市建设与高耗能企业碳减排绩效:内在机制与经验证据
Smart City Construction and Carbon Emission Reduction Performance of Energy-Consuming Enterprises: Intrinsic Mechanisms and Empirical Evidence
DOI: 10.12677/MOS.2023.125393, PDF,    国家社会科学基金支持
作者: 薛永善, 贾晓霞:上海理工大学管理学院,上海
关键词: 智慧城市高耗能企业碳排放PSM-DIDSmart City Energy-Intensive Enterprises Carbon Emission PSM-DID
摘要: 智慧城市建设作为促进城市智慧产业群集和产业转型升级的有力保障,为实体经济赋能的重要性日益凸显。基于2010~2020年我国智慧城市试点地级市内250家高耗能企业样本的面板数据,运用多期DID模型和PSM-DID模型实证检验了智慧城市试点政策对高耗能企业碳减排绩效的影响。研究结果表明:智慧城市试点建设有利于地级市内高耗能企业碳减排绩效的提高,且在政策实施前三年促进作用较高,该结论在一系列稳健性检验后依然成立。机制检验表明,技术创新在智慧城市试点政策对高耗能企业碳减排绩效的影响中起到了部分中介效应,中介效应占比为6.7%。异质性分析发现,国有高耗能企业受智慧城市试点政策的影响更大,其政策效应的估计系数高于非国有高耗能企业;所在省份环境规制越强,高耗能企业碳减排绩效的政策效应估计系数就越大,政策的影响幅度越高。
Abstract: The significance of smart city construction as a powerful guarantee to promote urban smart indus-try clustering and industrial transformation and upgrading to empower the real economy has been increasingly highlighted. Based on the panel data of a sample of 250 energy-intensive enterprises within prefecture-level cities of smart cities in China from 2010 to 2020, the impact of smart city pilot policies on the carbon emission reduction performance of energy-intensive enterprises is em-pirically examined using a multi-period DID model and a PSM-DID model. The findings show that the smart city pilot construction is conducive to the improvement of carbon emission reduction performance of high energy-consuming enterprises within prefecture-level cities, and the promo-tion effect is higher in the first three years of policy implementation, and this finding still holds after a series of robustness tests. The mechanism test shows that technological innovation plays a partial mediating effect in the impact of the smart city pilot policy on the carbon emission reduction per-formance of high energy-consuming enterprises, with the mediating effect accounting for 6.7%. The heterogeneity analysis found that state-owned high energy-consuming enterprises were more in-fluenced by the smart city pilot policy, and the estimated coefficient of its policy effect was higher than that of non-state-owned high energy-consuming enterprises; the stronger the environmental regulation in the province where they were located, the larger the estimated coefficient of the policy effect on the carbon emission reduction performance of high energy-consuming enterprises, and the higher the magnitude of the policy’s influence.
文章引用:薛永善, 贾晓霞. 智慧城市建设与高耗能企业碳减排绩效:内在机制与经验证据[J]. 建模与仿真, 2023, 12(5): 4305-4319. https://doi.org/10.12677/MOS.2023.125393

参考文献

[1] Pardo, N. and Moya, J.A. (2013) Prospective Scenarios on Energy Efficiency and CO2 Emissions in the European Iron & Steel Industry. Energy, 54, 113-128.
[2] 郭朝先. 产业结构变动对中国碳排放的影响[J]. 中国人口∙资源与环境, 2012, 22(7): 15-20
[3] Wang, Z.H., Yang, Z.M., Zhang, Y.X. and Yin, J.H. (2012) Energy Technology Patents—CO2 Emissions Nexus: An Empirical Analysis from China. Energy Policy, 42, 248-260.
[4] Geels, F.W., Sovacool, B.K., Schwanen, T. and Sorrell, S. (2017) Sociotechnical Transitions for Deep Decarbonization. Science, 357, 1242-1244.
[5] 石大千, 丁海, 卫平, 刘建江. 智慧城市建设能否降低环境污染[J]. 中国工业经济, 2018(6): 117-135.
[6] Chen, S.J., Mao, H. and Sun, J.Q. (2022) Low-Carbon City Construction and Corporate Carbon Reduction Performance: Evi-dence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 180, 125-143.
[7] 姬新龙. 碳排放权交易是否促进了企业环境责任水平的提升? [J]. 现代经济探讨, 2021(9): 49-55.
[8] 惠献波. 智慧城市建设与企业绿色全要素生产率:内在机制与经验证据——基于“赋能”和信贷配给的视角[J]. 企业经济, 2023, 42(2): 118-128
[9] 张龙鹏, 钟易霖, 汤志伟. 智慧城市建设对城市创新能力的影响研究——基于中国智慧城市试点的准自然试验[J]. 软科学, 2020, 34(1): 83-89.
[10] 宋德勇, 李超, 李项硕. 新型基础设施建设是否促进了绿色技术创新的“量质齐升”——来自国家智慧城市试点的证据[J]. 中国人口∙资源与环境, 2021, 31(11): 155-163.
[11] 唐珺, 高煜, 李朋林. 智慧城市能否通过智慧能源建设推动双碳目标实现?——基于合成控制法的试验证据[J/OL]. 软科学: 1-12[2023-08-27].
http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/51.1268.G3.20221010.1219.004.html
[12] 李珊, 湛泳. 产业转型升级视角下智慧城市建设的碳减排效应研究[J]. 上海财经大学学报, 2022, 24(5): 3-18, 107.
[13] 张兵兵, 陈思琪, 曹历娟. 城市因“智慧”而低碳吗?——来自智慧城市试点政策的探索[J]. 经济评论, 2022(6): 132-148.
[14] 姚圣文, 赵兰香, 张耀坤. 智慧城市建设提高企业全要素生产率了吗? [J]. 科学学研究, 2022, 40(11): 1957-1967
[15] Guo, C., Wang, Y.L., et al. (2023) Does Smart City Policy Improve Corporate Green Technology Innovation? Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies. Journal of Environmental Planning and Manage-ment.
[16] 洪银兴. 科技创新阶段及其创新价值链分析[J]. 经济学家, 2017(4): 5-12.
[17] Wang, C.M. and Li, J. (2020) The Evaluation and Promotion Path of Green Innovation Performance in Chinese Pollution-Intensive Industry. Sustainability, 12, Article 4198.
[18] 吴卫红, 丁章明, 王建英, 张爱美. 高耗能产业技术创新-节能效率-减排效率协同发展的影响因素[J]. 科技管理研究, 2018, 38(21): 233-242.
[19] 宋弘, 孙雅洁, 陈登科. 政府空气污染治理效应评估——来自中国“低碳城市”建设的经验研究[J]. 管理世界, 2019, 35(6): 95-108.
[20] 胡兆廉, 聂长飞, 石大千. 鱼和熊掌可否得兼?——创新型城市试点政策对城市产业集聚的影响[J]. 产业经济研究, 2021(1): 128-142.
[21] 温忠麟, 叶宝娟. 中介效应分析: 方法和模型发展[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(5): 731-745.
[22] 方兰, 汤鹤延. 碳排放权交易对企业碳减排的效应——基于中国上市公司数据的准自然实验方法分析[J]. 陕西师范大学学报, 2022, 51(5): 14-27.
[23] 汪方军, 孙俊勤. 政府压力对企业碳减排绩效的影响研究[J]. 预测, 2019, 38(1): 37-44.
[24] 白俊红, 张艺璇, 卞元超. 创新驱动政策是否提升城市创业活跃度——来自国家创新型城市试点政策的经验证据[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022(6): 61-78.