企业知识产权资产证券化的产品结构和风险剖析
Product Structure and Risk Analysis of Enterprise Intellectual Property Asset Securitization
摘要: 企业知识产权资产证券化是企业借助无形资产融资的重要渠道。在多种证券化形式中,供应链金融模式和专利许可使用授权模式的交易结构较具创新特点,前者以供应链核心企业的信用代替上下游中小企业的信用,帮助中小企业取得低成本融资,也改善了核心企业的收益状况;后者通过专利正向授权和反向二次授权,以许可使用费现金流为基础资产,在非转让的基础上获取证券化融资。但上述模式也具有底层资产估值困难且不确定性大、风险隔离不彻底以及脱离资产信用、过度依赖主体信用的弊端,由此增加了资产证券化交易的信用风险。面对估值困难,需增强持续性信息披露,适度弱化事前审查;在风险隔离方面,则需要在规范层面厘清基础资产在证券化交易中的权属问题,放宽信托制度的作用空间。
Abstract: The securitization of enterprise intellectual property assets is an important channel for enterprises to use intangible assets for financing. Among various forms of securitization, the transaction structure of supply chain finance model and patent licensing authorization model is more innovative. The former replaces the credit of upstream and downstream SMEs with the credit of core enterprises in supply chain, which helps SMEs obtain lowcost financing and improves the income of core enterprises. The latter obtains securitization financing on the basis of nontransfer through patent forward authorization and reverse secondary authorization, based on the cash flow of royalties. However, the above model also has the disadvantages of difficult and uncertain valuation of the underlying assets, incomplete risk isolation, separation from asset credit and excessive dependence on subject credit, thus increasing the credit risk of asset securitization transactions. In the face of valuation difficulties, it is necessary to strengthen continuous information disclosure and moderately weaken prior review; in terms of risk isolation, it is necessary to clarify the ownership of basic assets in securitization transactions at the normative level and relax the role space of trust system.
文章引用:潘子路. 企业知识产权资产证券化的产品结构和风险剖析[J]. 争议解决, 2023, 9(5): 2134-2141. https://doi.org/10.12677/DS.2023.95290

参考文献

[1] 陈柏彤, 马叶琳, 鲍新中. 我国专利资产证券化典型模式比较[J]. 科技管理研究, 2021, 41(24): 151-158.
[2] 鲍新中, 陈柏彤, 潘肇新. 供应链金融资产证券化的产品信用风险研究——基于QYSJ-ABS和RXZL-ABS的案例分析[J]. 金融理论与实践, 2022(2): 1-9.
[3] 王芳. 知识产权证券化的困境及解决方案——基础资产重构的双SPV模型[J]. 金融理论探索, 2020(6): 59-71.
[4] 谢黎伟. 美国的知识产权融资机制及其启示[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2010, 27(24): 40-44.
[5] 陈焕. 鲍伊债券——资产证券化界的“摇滚明星” [J]. 债券, 2015(7): 80-82.
[6] 苏平. 美国知识产权资产评估方法选择及其启示——以我国上市公司的知识产权资产评估为视角[J]. 知识产权, 2010, 20(3): 87-94.
[7] 周衍平, 徐华杰, 陈会英. 知识产权证券化定价及最优风险概率评估——基于改进的三叉树模型[J]. 金融发展研究, 2022(5): 71-79.
[8] 宣晓影. 我国供应链金融资产证券化的发展现状[J]. 现代商业银行, 2022(10): 44-47.
[9] Gelsomino, L.M., Mangiaracina, R., Perego, A. and Tumino, A. (2016) Supply Chain Fi-nance: A Literature Review. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logs Management, 46, 348-366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 杨跃云. 供应链金融应收账款资产证券化信用风险研究[J]. 中国注册会计师, 2022(2): 60-63.
[11] 陈中洁, 于辉. 资金约束背景下反向保理的供应链合作[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(12): 113-123.
[12] 鲍新中, 陈柏彤. 中国情境下知识产权证券化模式及关键要素设计——基于多案例的比较分析[J]. 经济体制改革, 2021(5): 136-143.
[13] 邹小芃, 王肖文, 李鹏. 国外专利权证券化案例解析[J]. 知识产权, 2009, 19(1): 91-95.
[14] 沈朝晖. 企业资产证券化法律结构的脆弱性[J]. 清华法学, 2017, 11(6): 61-74.
[15] 刘瑛, 刘思海. 中美知识产权证券化的基本情况及特殊目的机构对比——以中国首两例知识产权证券化案例为视角[J]. 河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2021, 48(1): 55-66.
[16] 洪艳蓉. 双层SPV资产证券化的法律逻辑与风险规制[J]. 法学评论, 2019, 37(2): 84-98.