征纳双方均无过错情形下不得征收税收滞纳金条款研究——以德发案和陈建伟案对比分析为视角
Study on the Perfection of Tax Late Payment Penalty System under the Circumstances of No Fault on Both Sides of Tax Collection and Payment—From the Perspective of Comparative Analysis of Defa Case and Chen Jianwei Case
摘要: 纳税人或者扣缴义务人未按规定期限缴纳税款,要缴纳税收滞纳金。《税收征管法》第五十二条的相关规定也已明确由过错方来承担税收滞纳金责任,但对于征纳双方均无过错的情形并未作出明确规定。存在相似情节的德发案和陈建伟案对于税收滞纳金却有着不同的判处结果,因此将两案进行比较,从实质课税原则、信赖利益保护的可能性、法经济学三个维度出发,提出将“征纳双方均无过错,不得加收滞纳金”的条款纳入税收征管法第五十二条的立法建议。
Abstract: If a taxpayer or withholding agent fails to pay tax within the prescribed time limit, it shall pay a tax overdue fine. The relevant provisions of Article 52 of the Tax Collection and Administration Law have also made it clear that the party at fault should bear the responsibility for tax late fees, but there is no clear provision for the situation where neither party is at fault. As the Guangzhou Defa Case and Putian Chen Jianwei Case, two cases with similar circumstances, have different sentencing results on tax late fees, so compare the two cases from the perspective of substantive taxation, the possibility of trust interest protection, and law and economics, the legislative proposal that “the tax authorities may require taxpayers and withholding agents to make up the tax within three years in case of non-payment or underpayment of tax due to no fault on both sides of the tax collection and payment, but no late fees shall be charged” is included in Article 52 of the Tax Administration Law.
文章引用:李杰. 征纳双方均无过错情形下不得征收税收滞纳金条款研究——以德发案和陈建伟案对比分析为视角[J]. 法学, 2023, 11(5): 3767-3773. https://doi.org/10.12677/OJLS.2023.115536

参考文献

[1] 周佑勇. 行政法的正当程序原则[J]. 中国社会科学, 2004(4): 115-124.
[2] 廖焕国. 注意义务与大陆法系侵权法的嬗变——以注意义务功能为试点[J]. 法学, 2006(6): 28-33+93.
[3] 屈茂辉. 论民法上的注意义务[J]. 北方法学, 2007(1): 2-14+22-34.
[4] 叶金育. 税法解释中纳税人主义研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 武汉: 武汉大学, 2015.
[5] 葛江虬. “知假买假”: 基于功能主义的评价标准构建与实际应用[J]. 法学家, 2020(1): 160-172+196.
[6] 刘剑文, 熊伟. 税法基础理论[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2004: 155-156+159-160.
[7] 张富强, 许健聪. 税收宏观调控中纳税人信赖利益之保护[J]. 法学杂志, 2016, 37(9): 67-77.
[8] 陈清秀. 现代税法原理与国际税法[M]. 台北: 元照出版有限公司, 2010: 276.
[9] 王雨薇, 孟海. 捆扎下的“尊严” [J]. 检察风云, 2013(20): 76-77.
[10] 杨凯. 涉税行政诉讼案件名不副实合同性质的认定——以民行交叉案件司法审查标准的规范化建构为视角[J]. 法律适用, 2022(6): 29-36.
[11] 刘耀东. 虚假离婚若干问题研究[J]. 云南大学学报, 2011, 24(2): 45-50.
[12] 罗伯特·考特, 托马斯·尤伦. 法和经济学[M]. 史晋川, 董雪兵, 等, 译. 上海: 格致出版社, 2014: 6+283.
[13] 汪昊. 我国税收超额负担变化、原因与对策——基于税收平滑模型的分析[J]. 财贸经济, 2007(5): 61-67.
[14] 余小伟. “公平责任”是否“公平”——以二十世纪新侵权法理论为视角[J]. 政治与法律, 2017(12): 107-122.