围填海历史遗留区域海洋生态服务价值损失评估研究
Study on the Loss Assessment of Marine Ecological Service Value in Historic Reclamation Areas
摘要: 近几年，为加快处理围填海历史遗留问题，自然资源部及各沿海省市自然资源管理部门相继出台了一系列政策文件，全面开展现状调查、进行生态评估、生态损害赔偿和生态修复并制定处理方案，妥善处置合法合规围填海项目。本文以历史遗留区域丁山三期北片围填海工程为例，选取了适合研究区的海洋生态系统服务价值损失的供给服务、调节服务、文化服务和支持服务四类指标，构建了各指标的计算模型，测算了研究区海洋生态系统服务价值损失总额。研究区围填海造地导致的海洋生态系统服务价值总损失为1112.06万元/a，其中供给服务价值损失最大、支持服务次之、调节服务损失最小。调节服务中，气体调节价值损失额占主导地位，支持服务中，生物多样性价值损失额占主导地位。该计算框架和研究范例，可为当地管理部门或其它地区对围填海历史遗留区域的管理提供技术参考和管理依据。
Abstract: In recent years, the Ministry of Natural Resources and natural resource management departments of coastal provinces and cities have issued a series of policy documents to speed up the handling of historical reclamation problems, comprehensively carrying out current situation investigation, ecological assessment, ecological damage compensation and ecological restoration, and formulating treatment plans to properly handle legal and compliant reclamation projects. Taking sea reclamation of Dingshan III as an example, this paper selected four indexes, namely: supply service, regulation service, cultural service and support service, constructed the calculation model of each index, and calculated the total loss of marine ecosystem service value. The total loss of marine ecosystem service value caused by land reclamation in the study area was 11.1206 million yuan/a, among which the loss of supply service value was the largest, followed by support service, regulation service loss is minimal. In regulation services, the loss of gas regulation value dominates, while in support services, the loss of biodiversity value dominates. The calculation framework and research example can provide technical reference and management basis for the local management department or other areas to manage the historical reclamation areas.
文章引用：相慧, 胡涛骏, 贾忠媛, 张雨庆. 围填海历史遗留区域海洋生态服务价值损失评估研究[J]. 海洋科学前沿, 2023, 10(3): 178-184. https://doi.org/10.12677/AMS.2023.103019

参考文献

[1] Costanza, R.R., d’Arge, R., De Groot, R.S., et al. (1997) The Value of the World’s Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital. Nature, 387, 253-260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[2] De Groot, R.S., Wilson, M.A. and Boumans, R.M.J. (2002) A Typology for the Classification, Description and Valuation of Ecosystem Services, Goods and Services. Ecological Economics, 41, 393-408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[3] 彭本荣, 洪华生, 陈伟琪, 等. 填海造地生态损害评估: 理论、方法及应用研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2005, 20(5): 714-726.
[4] 陈尚, 张朝晖, 马艳, 等. 我国海洋生态系统服务功能及其价值评估研究计划[J]. 地球科学进展, 2006, 21(11): 1127-1133.
[5] 苗丽娟. 围填海造成的生态环境损失评估方法初探[J]. 环境与可持续发展, 2007(3): 47-49.
[6] 谢高地, 甄霖, 鲁春霞, 等. 生态系统服务的供给、消费和价值化[J]. 资源科学, 2008, 30(1): 93-99.
[7] 索安宁, 于永海, 苗丽娟. 渤海海域生态系统功能服务价值评估[J]. 海洋经济, 2011, 1(4): 42-47.
[8] 索安宁, 张明慧, 于永海, 等. 曹妃甸围填海工程的海洋生态服务功能损失估算[J]. 海洋科学, 2012, 36(3): 108-114.
[9] 王静, 徐敏, 张益民, 等. 围填海的滨海湿地生态服务功能价值损失的评估——以海门市滨海新区围填海为例[J]. 南京师大学报(自然科学版), 2009, 32(4): 134-138.
[10] 张慧, 孙英兰. 青岛前湾填海造地海洋生态系统服务功能价值损失的估算[J]. 海洋湖沼通报, 2009(3): 34-38.
[11] 王萱, 陈伟琪, 张珞平, 等. 同安湾围(填)海生态系统服务损害的货币化预测评估[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(21): 5914-5924.
[12] 李睿倩, 孟范平. 填海造地导致海湾生态系统服务损失的能值评估——以套子湾为例[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(18): 5825-5835.
[13] 李京梅, 刘铁鹰. 基于生境等价分析法的胶州湾围填海造地生态损害评估[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(22): 7146-7155.
[14] 单菁竹, 李京梅, 许志华, 等. 协商货币评估法中的参与不平等性研究: 以胶州湾围填海造地生态损害评估为例[J]. 资源科学, 2022, 44(7): 1506-1519.
[15] MA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) (2005) Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: A Framework for Assessment. Island Press, Washington DC.
[16] 陈仲新, 张新时. 中国生态系统效益的价值[J]. 科学通报, 2000, 45(1): 108-116.
[17] 卢振彬, 杜琦, 颜尤明, 等. 厦门沿岸海域贝类适养面积和可养量的估算[J]. 台湾海峡, 1999, 18(2): 63-72.
[18] Tait, R.V. (1981) Elements of Marine Ecology: An Introductory Course. 3rd Edition, But-ter-Worth, London.
[19] Xie, G.D., Lu, C.X. and Leng, Y.F. (2003) Ecological Assets Valuation of the Tibetan Plateau. Journal of Natural Resources, 18, 189-196. (In Chinese)

为你推荐