我国离婚损害赔偿制度的完善——基于对现有学理建议的思考
The Improvement of the System of Compensation for Divorce Damages in China—Based on Thinking of the Exiting Academic Advice
摘要: 经过20多年的实践与探索,我国离婚损害赔偿制度已经纳入《民法典》,日渐趋于完善,但不可否认该制度仍存在权利主体单一、适用范围狭窄、缺乏同一赔偿标准等缺陷。以我国婚姻观念与法律制度、侵权救济法律体系及制度为前提,对学者提出的建立婚内损害赔偿制度、增加权利主体、扩大义务主体、扩大适用范围、明确赔偿标准等学理建议进行思考与评析,最终否定建立婚内损害赔偿制度与增加权利主体的合理性与必要性,肯定其余学理建议的合理性与必要性。
Abstract: After more than 20 years of practice and exploration, the system of compensation for divorce damages in China has been brought into Civil Code of the People’s Republic of China and tends to be perfect. However, there is no denying that the system is still defective, such as the single right’s subject, limited scope of application, indeterminacy standard of compensation, and so on. Based on the premise of China’s marriage concept, legal system, and system of tort remedies, this paper reflects on and evaluates scholars’ academic suggestions regarding the establishment of a system for compensating marital harm, expanding the rights and obligations of the parties involved, broadening the scope of application, and clarifying compensation standards. Ultimately, the rationality and necessity of establishing a system for compensating marital harm and expanding the rights of individuals are negated, while the rationality and necessity of the other academic suggestions are affirmed.
文章引用:许明翠. 我国离婚损害赔偿制度的完善——基于对现有学理建议的思考[J]. 法学, 2023, 11(5): 3971-3975. https://doi.org/10.12677/OJLS.2023.115564

参考文献

[1] 乔秋珍. 浅论我国离婚损害赔偿制度的不足及其立法完善[J]. 经济研究导刊, 2017(12): 193-194.
[2] 孟德花. 别居与离婚制度研究[M]. 北京: 中国人民公安大学出版社, 2009.
[3] 赵文宗. 中国内地、香港婚姻法实务[M]. 北京: 人民法院出版社, 2005.
[4] 薛军. 干扰婚姻关系的损害赔偿: 意大利的法理与判例[J]. 华东政法大学学报, 2013(3): 93-102.
[5] 郑园园. 离婚损害赔偿制度的法律适用[J]. 上海法学研究, 2020(11): 173-179.
[6] 王丽萍. 离婚损害赔偿法律制度研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 中国海洋大学, 2015.
[7] 解亘. 第三人干扰婚姻关系的民事责任——以日本法为素材[J]. 华东政法大学学报, 2013(3): 112-124.
[8] 李琰雁. 论我国离婚损害赔偿制度的不足与完善[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 中国政法大学, 2017.