论特别习惯国际法的识别
On the Identification of Special Customary International Law
摘要: 自2011年国际法委员会第63届会议开始,作为国际法渊源专题的新热点议题之一,特别习惯国际法已逐渐在国际实践中发挥作用。本文将结合国内外有限的学术观点、结论草案及评注、国际法院相关案例等研究资料,通过与一般习惯国际法的异同对比,对特别习惯国际法的构成要件、效力范围、举证责任等方面进行分析与识别,从而进一步加深对特别习惯国际法的认识。
Abstract: Since the 63rd session of the International Law Commission (ILC) in 2011, special customary international law, as one of the new hot topics on the topic of sources of international law, has gradually played a role in international practice. Based on the limited academic viewpoints at home and abroad, draft conclusions and commentaries, relevant cases of the International Court of Justice and other research materials, this paper will analyze and identify the constitutive requirements, scope of effectiveness and burden of proof of special customary international law by comparing with general customary international law, so as to further deepen the understanding of special customary international law.
文章引用:沈子琦. 论特别习惯国际法的识别[J]. 争议解决, 2023, 9(5): 2358-2363. https://doi.org/10.12677/DS.2023.95320

参考文献

[1] 奥本海. 奥本海国际法[M]. 王铁崖, 陈公绰, 汤宗舜, 周仁, 译. 北京: 中国大百科全书出版社, 1995.
[2] 汉斯•凯尔森. 国际法原理[M]. 王铁崖, 译. 北京: 华夏出版社, 1989.
[3] 李毅. 特殊国际习惯法刍论[J]. 国际关系学院学报, 2005(1): 55-59.
[4] Elias, O. (1996) The Relationship between General and Particular Customary Inter-national Law. African Journal of International and Comparative Law, 8, 67-88.
[5] 李浩培. 国际公法、国际私法、其他法律问题[M]//李浩培. 李浩培文选. 北京: 法律出版社, 2000: 92.
[6] Guzman, A.T. (2005) Saving Custom-ary International Law. Michigan Journal of International Law, 66 p. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef