逃逸动物被拾得后致人损害侵权责任认定问题
Issues Concerning the Determination of Tort Liability for Damage Caused to a Person by a Runaway Animal Found
DOI: 10.12677/OJLS.2023.115573, PDF,   
作者: 丘海龙:华东政法大学法律学院,上海
关键词: 动物逃逸无因管理侵权责任Animal Escape Negotiorum Gestio Tort Liability
摘要: 逃逸后的动物被拾得后,将会同时满足遗失物拾得规则与无因管理规则的适用条件。拾得遗失物规则与无因管理制度的关系存在不同学说。独立说的基本观点更符合我国实证法背景。第316条的规定具有实际意义,将阻却拾得遗失物情形下无因管理之构成。若遗弃、逃逸的动物致人损害,责任的终局承担者仍应是原所有权人或所有权人。
Abstract: An animal that escapes and is found will satisfy all applicable requirements of both the rule of picking up lost property and the rule of negotiorum gestio. There are different theories on the relationship between the rule of found lost property and the negotiorum gestio. The basic perspective of the doctrine of independence is more consistent with the positive law background in China. The provision in Article 316 has practical implications, and will prevent the negotiorum gestio in the case of found lost property. If an animal that is deserted or runaway causes any damage to any person, the original owner or current owner shall still be the one who bears the liability ultimately.
文章引用:丘海龙. 逃逸动物被拾得后致人损害侵权责任认定问题[J]. 法学, 2023, 11(5): 4036-4040. https://doi.org/10.12677/OJLS.2023.115573

参考文献

[1] 全国人大常委会法制工作委员会民法室, 主编. 中华人民共和国物权法条文说明、立法理由及相关规定[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2007.
[2] 史尚宽. 物权法论[M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2000.
[3] 王泽鉴. 民法物权[M]. 第2版. 北京: 北京大学出版社.
[4] 王利明. 物权法研究(上卷) [M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2007.
[5] 史尚宽. 债法总论[M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2000.
[6] 邹海林, 朱广新, 主编. 民法典评注: 侵权责任编2 [M]. 北京: 中国法制出版社, 2020.
[7] (德)齐佩利乌斯, 著. 法学方法论[M]. 金振豹, 译. 北京: 法律出版社, 2009.