电商平台“二选一”行为的法律规制
Legal Regulation of E-Commerce Platforms’ “Either-Or” Behavior
摘要: 电商平台“二选一”行为,严重侵犯了消费者的权益,主要表现为限制消费者的自主选择权、减损消费者可得利益、侵害消费者知情权。法律对平台“二选一”行为进行规制时,面临平台市场支配地位难以确认、消费者权益受影响程度难以评价,缺乏有效消费者维权机制等困难。因此应完善平台市场支配地位认定标准,将保护消费者权益和个人隐私纳入《反垄断法》,健全完善维权机制,更好维护消费者权益。
Abstract: In the face of the “either-or” practices by e-commerce platforms, it is crucial to recognize the significant infringement upon consumers’ rights. This manifests in restricting consumers’ freedom of choice, diminishing their potential benefits, and violating their right to be informed. Legal regulation of such behaviors encounters challenges such as difficulty in determining market dominance, assessing the extent of impact on consumer rights, and the absence of an effective consumer redress mechanism. Therefore, there is an imperative to refine the criteria for recognizing platform market dominance, incorporate the protection of consumer rights and personal privacy into the “Anti-Monopoly Law”, and enhance the redress mechanisms to better safeguard consumer interests.
文章引用:苏贵岩. 电商平台“二选一”行为的法律规制[J]. 争议解决, 2023, 9(5): 2397-2402. https://doi.org/10.12677/DS.2023.95326

参考文献

[1] 王晓哗. 论电商平台“二选一”行为的法律规制[J]. 现代法学, 2020, 42(3): 151-165.
[2] 杜思杏. 电商平台“二选一”行为法律规制浅议[J]. 合作经济与科技, 2023(3): 190-192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] 京东起诉天猫索赔10亿, 双11各方如何备战? [EB/OL].
https://m.thepaper.cn/baijiahao_4831204, 2019-10-31.
[4] 许丽. 电商平台“二选一”排他性交易的反垄断规制[J]. 中国流通经济, 2022, 36(4): 43-55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 耿丹, 孙江东. 电商平台“二选一”行为规则探究[J]. 中国市场, 2022(11): 184-186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 张新月. 我国反垄断民事诉讼中的举证责任分配[J]. 西部学刊, 2022(20): 63-66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 曾雄. 平台“二选一”反垄断规制的挑战与应对[J]. 经济学家, 2021(11): 91-99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] 许光耀. 互联网产业中排他性交易行为的反垄断法分析方法[J]. 中国应用法学, 2020(1): 37-48.
[9] 苏号朋. 优势电商平台“二选一”行为中的消费者权益保护[J]. 法律适用, 2021(3): 16-24.
[10] 黄武双, 谭宇航. 电子商务平台“二选一”行为的反不正当竞争法规制[J]. 电子知识产权, 2021(5): 53-64.
[11] 王晓晔. 浅论数字经济的反垄断监管[J]. 中国市场监管研究, 2021(2): 10-13.