含过氧化氢的气田水回注工艺过程安全风险评价
Safety Risk Assessment of Hydrogen Peroxide-Containing Gas Field Water Reinjection Process
DOI: 10.12677/JOGT.2023.453034, PDF,   
作者: 张益臣, 蒋一欣, 倪海龙, 牛凯杰, 徐欢欢:中国石油浙江油田分公司,四川 宜宾;吴晓霞:重庆科技学院安全工程学院(应急管理学院),重庆
关键词: 气田水双氧水回注风险评价Gas Field Water Hydrogen Peroxide Reinjection Risk Assessment
摘要: 双氧水处理后的回注气田水中含有超饱和度和亚稳定状态下的过氧化氢会对气田水回注工艺产生安全风险。本文用图形化描述本质安全方法(GRAND)对含过氧化氢的气田水回注工艺过程进行了安全评价,识别了含过氧化氢的气田水回注工艺过程中的危险源,并结合2维图形评价方法(2DGR)评估了工艺过程的危险水平。结果表明,含过氧化氢的气田水回注工艺过程的GRAND总分为326.33,落在2DGR图形的白色区域,含过氧化氢的气田水回注工艺过程安全风险低,安全风险可控。
Abstract: The reinjection gas field water after hydrogen peroxide treatment contains super saturation and hydrogen peroxide in the metastable state, which will pose a safety risk to the reinjection process of gas field water. In this paper, the graphical description of intrinsic safety method (GRAND) is used to evaluate the safety of hydrogen peroxide-containing gas field water reinjection process. The haz-ard sources in the process of hydrogen peroxide-containing gas field water reinjection are identified, and the risk level of the process is evaluated in combination with the two-dimensional graphical evaluation method (2DGR). The results show that the total GRAND score of the gas field water reinjection process containing hydrogen peroxide is 326.33, which falls in the white area of the 2DGR graph. The safety risk of the gas field water reinjection process containing hydrogen peroxide is low and controllable.
文章引用:张益臣, 吴晓霞, 蒋一欣, 倪海龙, 牛凯杰, 徐欢欢. 含过氧化氢的气田水回注工艺过程安全风险评价[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2023, 45(3): 280-286. https://doi.org/10.12677/JOGT.2023.453034

参考文献

[1] 马鸣, 张新妙, 陈子扬. 气田采出水处理技术研究进展[J]. 化工环保, 2023, 43(3): 285-291.
[2] Cole, G.M., Robbins, C.A., Grauberger, B.M., et al. (2022) Optimization of Mobile Oil and Gas Produced Water Treatment Unit De-ployment Logistics to Achieve Economic Feasibility. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 181, Article No. 106249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] 吴德建, 钱新明, 黄平. 过氧化氢热爆炸研究进展[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2011, 7(8): 14-20.
[4] 毛义田. 蒽醌法生产过氧化氢的安全事故分析及防范措施[J]. 中国氯碱, 2007(7): 34-37.
[5] Ahmad, S.I., Hashim, H. and Hassim, M.H. (2014) Numerical Descriptive Inherent Safety Technique (NuDIST) for Inherent Safety Assessment in Petrochemical Industry. Process Safety and Environmental Pro-tection, 92, 379-389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Ahmad, S.I., Hashim, H. and Hassim, M.H. (2016) A Graphical Method for Assessing Inherent Safety during Research and Development Phase of Process Design. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 42, 59-69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 李永磊, 张青瑞, 郭通, 等. 图形化法对过氧化氢生产工艺的风险评价[J]. 青岛科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 39(2): 44-49.
[8] 李永磊. 过氧化氢生产工艺的安全评估与动态控制[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 青岛: 青岛科技大学, 2018.
[9] 张国臣. 过氧化氢生产技术[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2012: 1-8.
[10] 吴德建, 钱新明, 黄平. 过氧化氢热爆炸研究进展[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2011, 7(8): 14-20.
[11] 姚冬龄. 蒽醌法生产过氧化氢安全技术[J]. 无机盐工业, 2007(5): 47-51.
[12] Srinivasan, R. and Nhan, N.T. (2007) A Statistical Approach for Evaluating Inherent Benign-ness of Chemical Process Routes in Early De-sign Stages. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 86, 163-174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef